Hi,
when trying to emerge -av1 --deep --with-bdeps=y dev-util/android-studio
(version 1.4.0.10.141.2288178-r1)
I get
!!! The following update(s) have been skipped due to unsatisfied dependencies
!!! triggered by backtracking:
dev-util/android-studio:0
What can I do to see the source of this p
On 09/05/2015 12:57 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> Hi all,
> A friend has a, I thin a few years old - Yosemite, Mac that I need to
> get some large files off. I though Mac's could read NTFS, the files are
> bigger than 4GB hence NTFS over FAT32, hence formatted a spare USB drive
> as NTFS and then
On 10/03/2015 06:41 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 02/10/2015 05:31, Andrew Lowe wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> I'm getting disillusioned with the direction KDE is taking, with
>>> respect to forcing users to use things they don't want to. The se
Whoops, big mistake on my part. I misread the threading of the original
email and credited the idea to Alan Mc Kinnon. The credit should go to
Rich Freeman.
Sorry Rich,
Andrew
On 10/10/2015 06:56 PM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> On 10/03/2015 06:41 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 12:28:27 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> when trying to emerge -av1 --deep --with-bdeps=y
> dev-util/android-studio (version 1.4.0.10.141.2288178-r1) I get
>
> !!! The following update(s) have been skipped due to unsatisfied
> dependencies !!! triggered by backtracking:
>
>
On 10/10/2015 22:07, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 12:28:27 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
>> when trying to emerge -av1 --deep --with-bdeps=y
>> dev-util/android-studio (version 1.4.0.10.141.2288178-r1) I get
>>
>> !!! The following update(s) have been skipped due to unsatisfied
>>
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:04:40 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > The only difference between those two ebuilds is a slight change in
> > the way the ncurses DEPEND is defined. It's hard to say more without
> > seeing the full output but you could try re-emerging ncurses.
> It's a bug in the ebuild an
On 11/10/2015 00:13, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:04:40 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>>> The only difference between those two ebuilds is a slight change in
>>> the way the ncurses DEPEND is defined. It's hard to say more without
>>> seeing the full output but you could try re-em
Mick gmail.com> writes:
> I thought you said you didn't want Big (Brother). Sure, GMX ain't Gmail, but
> we're still talking about a multinational megalith here, who's grown through
> acquisitions in different countries. In any case, if you're dialling in from
> the US, you'll be connecting
Hans interworld.net.au> writes:
> If you have or can get a fixed IP address and own domain name, check out
> ispconfig.org (mail, web, dns, ftp) and iredmail.org (mail). You can run
> either in VirtualBox with 500K ram or on a old laptop. Both run on top
> of Debian, Ubunto, OpenSuse.
ispcon
Howdy,
So I now have (5) statics and a fiber feed, with lots of room to grow.
I need to setup DNS primary/secondary systems on gentoo. So right now I'm
looking for a suggested list of packages to install with Bind, iptables and
DNSSEC-tools as these (2) gentoo dns servers will only run the minimu
11 matches
Mail list logo