Re: GHC 8.2.1 status

George Colpitts writes: > Thanks Ben. When you have a chance it would be good to update the status > page wrt what we > will be getting, specifically will Backpack be in 8.2.1 > Hi George, I just reviewed the status page and cleaned a few

Re: GHC 8.2.1 status

Thanks Ben. When you have a chance it would be good to update the status page wrt what we will be getting, specifically will Backpack be in 8.2.1 Cheers George On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:42 PM Ben Gamari wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Here

GHC 8.2.1 status

Hello everyone, Here is your periodic release update. After a number of false-starts, the tree is finally approaching a releasable state. Last week I cut the ghc-8.2 branch and things have been stabilizing ever since. At this point we are waiting on only a couple more fixes before the rc1 source r

Re: [commit: ghc] master: rts linker: Introduce MachOTypes (8ed29b5)

Moritz Angermann writes: > Hi Gabor, > > thanks! And sorry for causing trouble. I’ll look into the MachO > case. > Thanks for handling this Gabor and Moritz! Cheers, - Ben signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs

Re: [commit: ghc] master: rts linker: Introduce MachOTypes (8ed29b5)

Hi Gabor, thanks! And sorry for causing trouble. I’ll look into the MachO case. Cheers, Moritz > On Mar 27, 2017, at 8:50 PM, Gabor Greif wrote: > > Hi Moritz, > > I have just committed a6675a93efe7cae2f206508047a39e73ce4e92a5 > > There are two more spots to clean up, which I have left to y

Re: [commit: ghc] master: rts linker: Introduce MachOTypes (8ed29b5)

Hi Moritz, I have just committed a6675a93efe7cae2f206508047a39e73ce4e92a5 There are two more spots to clean up, which I have left to you, since I have no MachO machine to test on: ``` git grep "_.*FormatInfo" | grep -v LinkerInternals.h linker/MachOTypes.h:typedef struct _ObjectCodeFormatInfo {

Re: [commit: ghc] master: rts linker: Introduce MachOTypes (8ed29b5)

This commit 8ed29b50376856018dfbbcbd6d728c69af0c9f29 introduced a compilation failure with gcc4.4 (my gcc). The typedef-name `SectionFormatInfo` is redefined. Here is the reason: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6526322/why-redefinition-of-typedef-error-with-gcc-4-3-but-not-gcc-4-6 I have a fix

RE: SPECIALISE INLINE pragma

| A warning would be very welcome. Given that the debugging compiler | emits one, perhaps it's not too difficult to add. That's a good idea; but it's a bit tricky: see Trac #9418. It _must_ be possible to do better here. Simon | -Original Message- | From: Mikolaj Konarski [mailto:mi