s
> 78d9625 HEAD@{14}: guilt-push:
> respect-nobarrier-mount-option-in-nojournal-mode
> d08854f HEAD@{15}: guilt-pop: updating HEAD
> d08854f HEAD@{16}: guilt-pop: updating HEAD
> d08854f HEAD@{17}: guilt-push:
> optimize-ext4_should_retry_alloc-to-improve-ENOSPC-performance
&
v0.36. Yes, it's
been *way* too long since the last release, but hopefully that will change
going forward. By far, the most changes come from Per Cederqvist who
cleaned up some rather dark corners in the code. Thanks!
As always, patches, and other feedback is welcome.
Josef "J
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 03:44:16PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> Hi Josef,
>
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 11:20:46AM -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 11:04:45PM +0800, gnehzuil.liu wrote:
> > > ?? 2013-8-9??10:46??Josef 'Jeff'
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 11:04:45PM +0800, gnehzuil.liu wrote:
> �� 2013-8-9��10:46��Josef 'Jeff' Sipek д
>
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 08:32:28PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> >> From: Zheng Liu
> >>
> >> Currently guilt doesn't support
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 08:32:28PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> From: Zheng Liu
>
> Currently guilt doesn't support FreeBSD platform. This commit tries to
> add this support. The file called 'os.FreeBSD' is copied from os.Darwin
> due to these two platforms have almost the same command tools.
Out
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:45:31AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> I just had another idea (although I haven't had a chance to code up
> anything yet). Perhaps instead of, or in addition to, a global
> setting (i.e., guilt.reusebranch), perhaps we should have a per-branch
> setting, such as branch..
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 03:01:36PM +0200, Per Cederqvist wrote:
> When the option is true (the default), Guilt does not create a new Git
> branch when patches are applied. This way, you can switch between
> Guilt 0.35 and the current version of Guilt with no issues.
>
> At a future time, maybe a
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:10:10AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:39:21PM -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > I applied this one and the "guilt: skip empty line after..." patch.
>
> Thanks! BTW, it looks like you are not using &q
I applied this one and the "guilt: skip empty line after..." patch.
Jeff.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:13:31PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> If the date field has a space in it, such as:
>
>Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 18:37:15 +0200
>
> previously guilt would go belly up:
>
>+ export GIT_AUTH
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:55:57PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> To make it harder to accidentally do "git push" with a guilt patch
> applied, "guilt push" changes branch from e.g. "master" to
> "guilt/master" starting with commit 67d3af63f422. This is a feature
> which I use for ext4 development;
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 06:26:06PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Jeff and other guilty parties,
>
> I collected all the guilt patches I could find on-list and added one
> of my own. Completely untested, except for running the regression
> tests. These are also available via git protocol fro
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:19:39PM +0100, Per Cederqvist wrote:
> On 01/16/13 03:26, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >Hi Jeff and other guilty parties,
> >
> >I collected all the guilt patches I could find on-list and added one
> >of my own. Completely untested, except for running the regression
> >tests
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:26:06PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 06:26:06PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Hi Jeff and other guilty parties,
> >
> > I collected all the guilt patches I could find on-list and added one
> > of my own. Completely untested, except for runni
13 matches
Mail list logo
