Re: Git very slow ?

2015-03-08 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 12:39:10PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > The comments on git bisect were for linus'skernel tree, on a local > > disk. 2.3GB of repo, just under 57000 files. > > Ugh. I hope you ar

Re: Git very slow ?

2015-03-08 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 05:21:22PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Kevin D writes: > > > On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 01:30:07AM +, Ken Moffat wrote: > >> Hi, please CC me if that is not your usual fashion, because I am not > >> subscribed. > >> > >

Re: Git very slow ?

2015-03-08 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 04:51:36PM +0100, Kevin D wrote: > On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 01:30:07AM +0000, Ken Moffat wrote: > > Hi, please CC me if that is not your usual fashion, because I am not > > subscribed. > > > > I use git for my build scripts - those are acce

Git very slow ?

2015-03-06 Thread Ken Moffat
Hi, please CC me if that is not your usual fashion, because I am not subscribed. I use git for my build scripts - those are accessed over nfs. Since I started using 2.1 and later (I don't think I used 2.0) commands such as 'commit' take a long time before anything happens. I assumed that the new

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git v1.9-rc0

2014-01-22 Thread Ken Moffat
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:04:02PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Ken Moffat writes: > > > I note that all of these *are* still available at googlecode for > > the moment : https://code.google.com/p/git-core/downloads/list > > As I said, Cgc is not the ony do

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git v1.9-rc0

2014-01-22 Thread Ken Moffat
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:10:18AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Vicent Martí writes: > > >> Do these consume CPU every time somebody asks for a tarball? That > >> might be considered "wrong" depending on the view. > > > > No, our infrastructure caches frequently requested tarballs so they > >