Re: [PATCH] tile: support GENERIC_KERNEL_THREAD and GENERIC_KERNEL_EXECVE

2012-10-23 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Jeff King wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:47:28PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > I agree that this is a common issue. Acked-by/Reviewed-by mails come > > in after the fact that the patch has been committed to an immutable > > (i.e no-rebas

Re: [PATCH] tile: support GENERIC_KERNEL_THREAD and GENERIC_KERNEL_EXECVE

2012-10-23 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:30:26PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > > > I fetched the series from your arch-tile branch and built it, and it works > > fine. It looks good from my inspection: > > > > Acked-by: Chris Metcalf > > Thanks; Acked-by applied, branch

Re: Where'd my GIT tree go?

2005-07-07 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 21:48 -0700, Tony Luck wrote: > Groan ... as well you should. > > My tree has re-appeared now. Thanks to whoever fixed it. I noticed similar effects recently. Its related to the mirroring of master.kernel.org to the public server. At some point you have only the half of upd

Full history

2005-04-16 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Hi, I can publish the stuff on monday from a university nearby. --- total blob objects = 228384 total tree objects = 172507 total commit objects = 55877 The "empty" changesets which are noting merges are omitted at the moment. Is it of interest to include them ?? It might also be interes

Re: full kernel history, in patchset format

2005-04-16 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 12:15 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > For the export stuff its terrible slow. :( > > What kind of _strange_ scripting architecture is so fast that there's a > difference between "c

Re: full kernel history, in patchset format

2005-04-16 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 11:44 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > That level of abstraction ("we never look directly at the objects") is > what allows us to change the object structure later. For example, we > already changed the "commit" date thing once, and the tree object has > obviously evolved a

Re: Re: full kernel history, in patchset format

2005-04-16 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 20:32 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 09:23:40PM CEST, I got a letter > where Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > One remark on the tree blob storage format. > > The binary storage of the sha1sum of

Re: full kernel history, in patchset format

2005-04-16 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 10:04 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So I'd _almost_ suggest just starting from a clean slate after all. > Keeping the old history around, of course, but not necessarily putting it > into git now. It would just force everybody who is getting used to git in > the first plac

BK -> git export done

2005-04-16 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Hi folks, I managed finally to export the complete kernel history into git format The resulting number of objects is ~ 50 The required disk space is ~ 3.2 GiB We also tracked the blob/tree/commit references in a SQL database. We will post a SQL dump when the database is in a bit better shape.