Re: [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Improve wording in a comment

2015-02-05 Thread Stefan Beller
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Sebastian Schuberth wrote: > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Sebastian Schuberth > wrote: > >>> Is that an improvement? Is the plural of "dup" (used as an >>> abbreviation of "duplicate") "dupes" not "dups"? >> >> My view is that the abbreviation of "duplicate" i

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Improve wording in a comment

2015-02-05 Thread Sebastian Schuberth
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Sebastian Schuberth wrote: >> Is that an improvement? Is the plural of "dup" (used as an >> abbreviation of "duplicate") "dupes" not "dups"? > > My view is that the abbreviation of "duplicate" is not "dup" but > "dupe", hence the plural "dupes". For "duplicate" t

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Improve wording in a comment

2015-02-05 Thread Sebastian Schuberth
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Sebastian Schuberth writes: > >> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth >> --- > > Is that an improvement? Is the plural of "dup" (used as an > abbreviation of "duplicate") "dupes" not "dups"? My view is that the abbreviation of "duplicate"

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Improve wording in a comment

2015-02-05 Thread Junio C Hamano
Sebastian Schuberth writes: > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth > --- Is that an improvement? Is the plural of "dup" (used as an abbreviation of "duplicate") "dupes" not "dups"? > Makefile | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > index c

[PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Improve wording in a comment

2015-02-05 Thread Sebastian Schuberth
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth --- Makefile | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index c44eb3a..6f8ae23 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -2447,7 +2447,7 @@ check-docs:: esac; \ done ) | sort -### Make sure built-ins do n