This version seems to break t7811 when applied on top of 37023ba3
(Seventh batch for 2.7, 2015-10-26).
I'll eject it from 'pu' for today's integration.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at h
I forgot..
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Victor Leschuk wrote:
> + else if (num_threads < 0)
> + die("Invalid number of threads specified (%d)", num_threads);
Please wrap this string with _() so it can be translated
--
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Victor Leschuk wrote:
> "git grep" can now be configured (or told from the command line)
> how many threads to use when searching in the working tree files.
>
> Changes to default behavior: number of threads now doesn't depend
> on online_cpus(), e.g. if specif
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Victor Leschuk
wrote:
> "git grep" can now be configured (or told from the command line)
> how many threads to use when searching in the working tree files.
>
> Changes to default behavior: number of threads now doesn't depend
> on online_cpus(), e.g. if specifi
Hello all,
does anybody have time to review this patch?
PS Sorry for bothering =)
--
Best Regards,
Victor
From: Victor Leschuk [vlesc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 03:52
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Victor Leschuk
Subject: [PATCH v6] Ad
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:11:16AM -0800, Victor Leschuk wrote:
>
>> The earlier version of this patch is already included in /pu branch,
>> however as we all agreed ($gmane/280299) we have changed the default
>> behavior and the meaning of "0".
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:11:16AM -0800, Victor Leschuk wrote:
> The earlier version of this patch is already included in /pu branch,
> however as we all agreed ($gmane/280299) we have changed the default
> behavior and the meaning of "0". The question is: what is the right
> way to include chang
Hello all,
The earlier version of this patch is already included in /pu branch, however as
we all agreed ($gmane/280299) we have changed the default behavior and the
meaning of "0". The question is: what is the right way to include changes from
patch v6 (this one) into already merged patch to p
8 matches
Mail list logo