Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> Will do. Thanks
Make sure you do it after the ENOKEY fix has been merged.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/
All,
I am taking a shot at providing developer documentation[1] for the 'mystic'
syncop framework. People who care for this, please provide feedback to help
improve the content.
[1] - http://review.gluster.com/10365
cheers,
~KP
___
Gluster-devel mailin
Resending if anyone has ideas..
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Raghuram BK wrote:
>
> I've been trying to figure out the performance overhead of gluster over
> the underlying filesystem and find the difference to be quite stark. Is
> this normal? Can something be done about it? I've tried to e
On 04/30/2015 10:18 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
Do you mind giving +1 from NetBSD regression side for
http://review.gluster.com/10391 in that case?
Sure, but you can also rebase: glupy.t result is now ignored by
run-tests.sh (regardless of the OS).
Will do. T
Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> Do you mind giving +1 from NetBSD regression side for
> http://review.gluster.com/10391 in that case?
Sure, but you can also rebase: glupy.t result is now ignored by
run-tests.sh (regardless of the OS).
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbs
On 30/04/15 09:18, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 04/30/2015 08:44 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Hi
Here is NetBSD regression status update for broken tests:
- tests/basic/afr/split-brain-resolution.t
Anuradha Talur is working on it, the change being still under review
http://review.gluste
On 04/30/2015 10:02 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On a related note, I see glupy is failing spuriously as well:
Know anything about it?
glupy.t used to work and was broken quite recenly. My investigation led
to a free on an invalid pointer, but I am not able to r
On 04/30/2015 01:04 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 09:14:37PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:30:20PM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>>>
>>> Any reason you don't want to run it as: `glusterd --xlator-option
>>> *.upgrade=on -N > /dev/null 2>&1` ?
>>
>>
Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> On a related note, I see glupy is failing spuriously as well:
> Know anything about it?
glupy.t used to work and was broken quite recenly. My investigation led
to a free on an invalid pointer, but I am not able to reproduce it
reliabily.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
ht
On 04/30/2015 08:44 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Hi
Here is NetBSD regression status update for broken tests:
- tests/basic/afr/split-brain-resolution.t
Anuradha Talur is working on it, the change being still under review
http://review.gluster.org/10134
- tests/basic/ec/
This works but with ra
Hi
Here is NetBSD regression status update for broken tests:
- tests/basic/afr/split-brain-resolution.t
Anuradha Talur is working on it, the change being still under review
http://review.gluster.org/10134
- tests/basic/ec/
This works but with rare spurious faiures. Nobody works on it.
- tests/
Hello
NetBSD (and any non Linux system) was broken by this change that
introduce linux specific ENOKEY:
http://review.gluster.org/9918
Proposed fix is to turn it into EINVAL:
http://review.gluster.org/10456
This should be addressed quickly, as no change will pass NetBSD
regression until it is fi
Sweet! Here is the baseline:
[root@gqas001 ~]# gluster v rebalance testvol status
Node Rebalanced-files size
scanned failures skipped status run time in
secs
- --- -
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 09:14:37PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:30:20PM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> >
> > Any reason you don't want to run it as: `glusterd --xlator-option
> > *.upgrade=on -N > /dev/null 2>&1` ?
>
> I think it would be nicer to use --log-level=/de
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:30:20PM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>
> Any reason you don't want to run it as: `glusterd --xlator-option
> *.upgrade=on -N > /dev/null 2>&1` ?
I think it would be nicer to use --log-level=/dev/null instead, or would
that not override the -N option?
Niels
>
>
>
On Apr 29, 2015 22:00, "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" wrote:
>
>
> Any reason you don't want to run it as: `glusterd --xlator-option
> *.upgrade=on -N > /dev/null 2>&1` ?
No reason. Just felt it is not really intuitive or explanatory on why someone
should compulsorily use no-daemon option when starting
Doh my mistake, I thought it was merged. I was just running with the
upstream 3.7 daily. Can I use this run as my baseline and then I can run
next time on the patch to show the % improvement? I'll wipe everything and
try on the patch, any idea when it will be merged?
Yes, it would be very usef
On Wednesday 29 April 2015 09:26 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
If we were to run without `-N`, in daemon mode, yum wouldn't know when
glusterd actually finished the upgrade process. Yum would consider the
parent process returning to be the end.
I did an experiment and here is what I found,
[root@192 ~]
Any reason you don't want to run it as: `glusterd --xlator-option
*.upgrade=on -N > /dev/null 2>&1` ?
On 04/29/2015 11:56 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
If we were to run without `-N`, in daemon mode, yum wouldn't know when
glusterd actually finished the upgrade process. Yum would consider the
parent
If we were to run without `-N`, in daemon mode, yum wouldn't know when
glusterd actually finished the upgrade process. Yum would consider the
parent process returning to be the end.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As part of the yum upgrade procedure, when gl
Hi,
As part of the yum upgrade procedure, when glusterfs-server is updated
we run glusterd in no daemon mode along with upgrade option with this
command.
glusterd --xlator-option *.upgrade=on -N
This helps us update our vol files with new defaults along with
few other things.(say we added a new
Hi,
Looks like the URL wasn't complete , sorry about that.
Please find the correct link here,
https://plus.google.com/events/c9omal6366f2cfkcd0iuee5ta1o
Thanks
Meghana
- Original Message -
From: "Meghana Madhusudhan"
To: gluster-devel@gluster.org
Cc: nfs-gane...@redhat.com, "Soumya Kod
Hi everyone,
We've scheduled an Hangout session tomorrow about NFS-Ganesha features in
GlusterFS 3.7.
This session would include a preview of the features and a quick demo of
active/active HA implementation.
Please plan to join the Hangout session
https://plus.google.com/events/c9omal636
Tha
Hi everyone,
We've scheduled a Hangout session tomorrow about NFS-Ganesha features in
GlusterFS 3.7.
This session would include a preview of the features and a quick demo of
active/active HA implementation.
Please plan to join the Hangout session
https://plus.google.com/events/c9omal636
Thanks
On 04/29/2015 08:57 AM, Benjamin Turner wrote:
Doh my mistake, I thought it was merged. I was just running with the
upstream 3.7 daily. Can I use this run as my baseline and then I can
run next time on the patch to show the % improvement? I'll wipe
everything and try on the patch, any idea whe
On 29 Apr 2015, at 12:30, Justin Clift wrote:
> Reminder!!!
>
> The weekly Gluster Community meeting is in 30 mins, in
> #gluster-meeting on IRC.
>
> This is a completely public meeting, everyone is encouraged
> to attend and be a part of it. :)
Thanks for everyone for attending!
* 3.6.3 has b
- Original Message -
> From: "M S Vishwanath Bhat"
> To: "Benjamin Turner"
> Cc: "Kiran Patil" , gluster-us...@gluster.org, "Gluster
> Devel" ,
> btur...@redhat.com
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 3:20:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Benchmark Kit
>
> On 28 April 2015 at
Doh my mistake, I thought it was merged. I was just running with the
upstream 3.7 daily. Can I use this run as my baseline and then I can run
next time on the patch to show the % improvement? I'll wipe everything and
try on the patch, any idea when it will be merged?
-b
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at
Reminder!!!
The weekly Gluster Community meeting is in 30 mins, in
#gluster-meeting on IRC.
This is a completely public meeting, everyone is encouraged
to attend and be a part of it. :)
To add Agenda items
***
Just add them to the main text of the Etherpad, and be at
the meeting
On 29 Apr 2015, at 08:05, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 02:40:54AM -0400, Jeff Darcy wrote:
label.Label-Name.copyAllScoresOnTrivialRebase
If true, all scores for the label are copied forward when a new patch
set is uploaded that is a trivial rebase. A new patch
>> I add some private function in dht_create() as bellow.
>>
>> When current pwd is not "/",everything is ok,otherwise,syncop_getxattr
will
>> be blocked(In target subvol,"server3_3_getxatt" did not run ).
>>
>>
>> dict_t *xattr = NULL;
>> loc_t loc = {0, };
>> memset (loc.gfid, 0, 16);
>> loc.
Hi All,
Just pushed tag v3.7.0beta1 to glusterfs.git. A tarball of 3.7.0beta1 is
now available at [1]. RPM and other packages will appear in
download.gluster.org when the respective packages are ready.
Important features available in beta1 include:
- bitrot
- tiering
- inode quotas
- shardin
Hi Ben
I checked out the glusterfs process attaching gdb and I could not find the
newer code. Can you confirm whether you took the new patch ? patch i:
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9657/
Thanks,
Susant
- Original Message -
> From: "Susant Palai"
> To: "Benjamin Turner" , "Nithya B
> We want to place file on any subvol other than local ,in the contrary of
> NUFA。
> From GDB ,syncop_getxattr is on the same backtrace of
> "event_dispatch_epoll_handler" which runing in main thread.So any response
> can not come in ?
That is the short answer.
syncop_* calls need to be executed
On 04/29/2015 11:55 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
I've seen few cases where we are using mainline bugs in submitting
patches in 3.7 release. Process wise this looks incorrect to me. IIRC,
earlier the smoke used to complaint about it, but I am not seeing that
either these days. Any recent changes on t
Ben, will you be able to give rebal stat for the same configuration and data
set with older rebalance infra ?
Thanks,
Susant
- Original Message -
> From: "Susant Palai"
> To: "Benjamin Turner"
> Cc: "Gluster Devel"
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:08:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-
On 28 April 2015 at 01:03, Benjamin Turner wrote:
> Hi Kiran, thanks for the feedback! I already put up a repo on githib:
>
> https://github.com/bennyturns/gluster-bench
>
> On my TODO list is:
>
> -The benchmark is currently RHEL / RHGS(Red Hat Gluster Storage) specific,
> I want to make things
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 02:40:54AM -0400, Jeff Darcy wrote:
> > > label.Label-Name.copyAllScoresOnTrivialRebase
> > >
> > > If true, all scores for the label are copied forward when a new patch
> > > set is uploaded that is a trivial rebase. A new patch set is considered
> > > as trivial rebase if
38 matches
Mail list logo
