On 10/10/09 14:51, quoth David Hardy:
> This discussion reminds me of a number of IT job interviews I had where
> the tech questions asked of me were delivered in a smug, condescending
> tone, and if I didn't know every single facet of their infrastructure
> when I walked through their door, then I
Drew Van Zandt wrote:
> Have you considered using a fast compression/decompression algorithm
> before you transmit, one that isn't too computationally intensive for
> either compression or decompression? You won't get high compression
> (factor of 10) as you might with slower ones, but if you g
Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
> Bruce Labitt writes:
>
>> What I'm trying to do: Optimizer for a radar power spectral density problem
>>
>> Problem: FFTs required in optimization loop take too long on current
>> workstation for the optimizer to even be viable.
>>
>> Attempted solution: FFT en
Jim Kuzdrall wrote:
> Greetings Bruce,
>
> Interesting and challenging project!
>
> On Saturday 10 October 2009 15:20, Bruce Labitt wrote:
>
>> For anyone that is remotely interested, here is the big picture for
>> the problem I'm trying to solve. If you are not interested, hey
>> delete th
Lloyd Kvam wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-10-10 at 15:20 -0400, Bruce Labitt wrote:
>
>> Nit in solution: TCP transport time >> FFT execution time, rendering
>> attempted solution non-viable
>>
>> Researches TCP optimization: Reads countless papers on tcp
>> optimization techniques... Fails to find a r
Have you considered using a fast compression/decompression algorithm before
you transmit, one that isn't too computationally intensive for either
compression or decompression? You won't get high compression (factor of 10)
as you might with slower ones, but if you get even a factor of 2, you've
jus
Bruce Labitt writes:
>
> What I'm trying to do: Optimizer for a radar power spectral density problem
>
> Problem: FFTs required in optimization loop take too long on current
> workstation for the optimizer to even be viable.
>
> Attempted solution: FFT engine on remote server to reduce over
Greetings Bruce,
Interesting and challenging project!
On Saturday 10 October 2009 15:20, Bruce Labitt wrote:
> For anyone that is remotely interested, here is the big picture for
> the problem I'm trying to solve. If you are not interested, hey
> delete the post. Won't irritate me in the le
