Hi,
I need two clarifications as this change basically broke everything ;)
1. API:
The GNS_lookup API call takes a zone to look up in. Previously tools looked up
the "gns-master" for a sane default value.
This is no longer needed I guess??
If yes, we should remove it.
2. Proxy:
The proxy still
> On 4. Mar 2018, at 13:56, Schanzenbach, Martin <mschanzenb...@posteo.de>
> wrote:
>
> I don't understand how you can delegate TLDs.
> In GNUnet currently we have identities (=local namespaces).
> As I understand it, those are now the TLDs handled locally via GNS.
&g
en _I_ must populate that namespace. I
cannot delegate it anymore.
With a default root namespace (formerly known as "gns-master"), what namespace
would I use for delegation of the "de" TLD?
> On 4. Mar 2018, at 11:32, Christian Grothoff <groth...@gnunet.org> wrote:
>
Hi,
I have a few "concerns":
> On 3. Mar 2018, at 23:06, Christian Grothoff wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I've just pushed a significant change to GNS to master, which may affect
> some of you and I wanted to make sure you're not caught unaware.
>
> Basically, I've removed
Registered. How/Where do we collect the ideas? And how to they end up in the
GSoC portal again?
Further, as a reminder: I am willing to co-mentor. If you want to share the
load etc please tell me now before I think of more projects.
BR
Martin
> On 12. Feb 2018, at 22:39, Christian Grothoff
Thanks!
Looks great.
Initially, I was pretty skeptical. But I really like the last few batches from
everyone.
The one I dig the most at the moment is the wireframe GNU.
Although the design is clearly borrowed from the Guix icon, it is a nice
makeover of the current logo because it keeps the
> On 27. Jan 2018, at 10:09, amirouche wrote:
>
> Thanks everyone for the feedback!
>
> I will not reply to every single mail and try to summarize the the whole
> thread here.
>
> Le ven. 26 janv. 2018 à 23:44, Marcel Klehr a écrit :
>> Hey
design standards (see links in the links) the
current icon is maybe not ideal, but good.
> On 26. Jan 2018, at 20:45, Schanzenbach, Martin <mschanzenb...@posteo.de>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 26. Jan 2018, at 19:31, carlo von lynX <l...@time.to.get.psyced.org
> On 26. Jan 2018, at 19:31, carlo von lynX wrote:
>
> Martin, we are the minority of people who accepted
> the gnu on the web...
You have anything to back that claim?
> maybe we want to extend our
> audience to the people that think that such a home-
> grown logo
Hi,
> On 26. Jan 2018, at 01:07, amirouche wrote:
>
> Héllo,
>
>
> I got into creating a new logo for gnunet and work on the new gnunet website.
Any reason for that? I quite like the current logo. It represents the name very
well (A GNU on a net).
Maybe it could be
Hi,
I would mentor the REST project (again).
Further, I am thinking about a zero-knowledge GNS record based on zkSNARKS or
Bulletproof.
This could be used in combination with GNS to serve privacy-preserving
attribute-based credentials.
WDYT?
I am also open to co-mentoring any of the other
ist for the last release and
> gnunet.org/hostlist for git.
> (At least that's the way I read it.)
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 06:56:44 +, ng0 wrote:
>> Schanzenbach, Martin transcribed 4.5K bytes:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I kind of ag
Hi,
I kind of agree.
> On 26. Oct 2017, at 19:51, carlo von lynX wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 05:42:45PM +0200, Christian Grothoff wrote:
>> 2) Yes, running in the 'global' network with outdated peers is likely to
>> cause all kinds of fun problems, as the
Hi Peter,
I am not going to respond to the individual steps inline as I do not have
anything particular to add there.
But I have experienced exactly the same issue. Unfortunately, I am not sure
what the underlying problem is.
Maybe Christian knows of some open blocking bugs in cadet.
301 - 314 of 314 matches
Mail list logo