On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:37:35 -0600, Aaron Toponce
wrote:
> > caff $FPR1 $FPR2 ...
>
> Well, if I need to provide each key ID/fingerprint, then I might as well
> write a simple loop:
>
> for KEYID in...; do
> gpg --sign $KEYID
> gpg --armor --export $KEYID
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 25 August 2011 at 7:02:52 PM, in
, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> If I have a public keyring of all the attendees of the
> party, then I will want to sign every key in that
> keyring.
You could have a keyring that purported to be all the
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 07:35:09PM +0100, MFPA wrote in
<531058786.20110825193509@my_localhost>:
Hi
On Thursday 25 August 2011 at 7:02:52 PM, in
, Aaron Toponce wrote:
If I have a public keyring of all the attendees of the
party, then I will want to sign every key in that
keyring.
You coul
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:02:52 -0600, Aaron Toponce
wrote:
> If I have a public keyring of all the attendees of the party, then I
> will want to sign every key in that keyring.
This should be very easy to script. See the following options:
--keyring FILE
--list-public-keys
--with-colons
and the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/25/2011 11:02, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 11:56 AM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
>> Do you want to sign every key in your keyring? If so, it's not
>> hard to get gpg to enumerate all of your keys in a
>> machine-parsable format (see
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:02:52PM -0600, Aaron wrote in
<4e568e4c.8080...@gmail.com>:
On 08/25/2011 11:56 AM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
Do you want to sign every key in your keyring? If so, it's not hard to
get gpg to enumerate all of your keys in a machine-parsable format (see
--with-colon
Is there any way to mark a key as local-only, similar to an
lsign-created local signature?
I'm asking because I plan on generating a master key to be used by a
piece of software where ultimate trust can be rooted, and there is
really no need to have even the public half of this key ever leave the
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:22, la...@thehaverkamps.net said:
> I compiled both the stock 1.4.11 & the Ubuntu 1.4.10. Both ways I get
> gpg: invalid item `BZIP2' in preference string
You build gpg without bzip2 support. Install the libbz2-dev before
configuring.
> changing from 4096 to 8192 bit)
D
On 08/25/2011 12:50 PM, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> According to the gnupg(1) manpage, I see "--multifile" for encryption,
> decryption and verification. Is it possible to use this to sign multiple
> keys simultaneously? I don't have any keys to sign, or I would give this
> a try (I guess I could manual
I compiled both the stock 1.4.11 & the Ubuntu 1.4.10. Both ways I get
the following error:
$ gpg --gen-key
gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.10; Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law
On 8/25/2011 10:28 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Except that, quite clearly, most users have no idea it is their problem
> and the problem remains unsolved.
Now that you mention it, I'd like to reject the premise outright: that
this is a problem. How do we know it's a problem? I don't doubt t
On 08/25/2011 10:04 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Now, maybe you have thousands of keys on your keyring and it takes a
> ridiculous amount of time, but I suspect you're a bit of an outlier.
Yes, it's true, and yes, i'm an outlier. At the moment.
> The problem for any system of automated certifi
On 8/25/11 9:36 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Yes, i do this myself, but with a large keyring, a full --refresh-keys
> takes ages and thrashes my machine.
Define 'large keyring', please: I mean no offense, but that's a pretty
vague word.
proverbs:~ rjh$ gpg --list-keys|grep "^pub"|wc -l
2
On 08/25/2011 09:00 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 8/25/11 8:27 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> This sort of situation is one which a better toolset could automate.
>
> It would seem the proper place for this is to leverage existing system
> automation tools, not inventing something new.
>
>
On 8/25/11 8:27 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> This sort of situation is one which a better toolset could automate.
It would seem the proper place for this is to leverage existing system
automation tools, not inventing something new.
proverbs:~ rjh$ crontab -l
30 2 * * * gpg --refresh-keys
On 08/24/2011 09:40 PM, David Manouchehri wrote:
> I personally try to update my keyring every few weeks.
This sort of situation is one which a better toolset could automate.
If you have suggestions about how/when gpg could automatically refresh
keys, you might consider adding them to this
16 matches
Mail list logo