After the review I got for a couple of lines from Mr Broyer I'm a bit
worried what he will say about code even I think is "rough and ready" ;)
Field declarations are definitely not in lexical order!
On Wednesday, July 24, 2013 11:58:39 AM UTC+1, GWTter wrote:
>
> I knew you guys wouldn't be imp
I knew you guys wouldn't be implementing it that way, but the demo sort of
gives that impression so the clarification is helpful.
And as far as what most people are using, I'm not sure. However I have seen
other discussions about implementing such authentication and retry queues
via the default
Thanks,
We use CAS (single sign on) so what we do is hide the "retry/please wait"
message on auth failure and use an iframe to show the CAS login. If they
login with that form (or somewhere else) then on a retry the app carries on.
I've very little idea what auth most GWT/RequestFactory people
Hi,
The mechanism looks pretty good from the demo, nice. I would only say that
I'm not sure I would use the same retry message for both network and
authentication failures. Do you really want to keep retrying
authentications for any other reason than a network failure?
On Tuesday, July 23, 201
I've added a Gmail like UI component and added it to the demo...
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 6:42:15 PM UTC+1, salk31 wrote:
>
> Doh. Looked to see how long it would take to put it up on GAE and only
> took ten minutes to actually do it.
>
> http://gwt-rf-queue.appspot.com/
>
> So good old DynaTab
Doh. Looked to see how long it would take to put it up on GAE and only took
ten minutes to actually do it.
http://gwt-rf-queue.appspot.com/
So good old DynaTableRf but with gwt-rf-queue but with the Transport
replaced and a bit of extra UI.
--
You received this message because you are subscr
I'm also quite interested but haven't had time to look.
On 18 July 2013 10:00, salk31 wrote:
> Ho k... I'll be very interested to hear your thoughts... If you think it
> is fixable maybe GAE demo with some UI may be next step for me?
>
>
> On Thursday, July 18, 2013 9:49:47 AM UTC+1, Thomas Bro
Ho k... I'll be very interested to hear your thoughts... If you think it is
fixable maybe GAE demo with some UI may be next step for me?
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 9:49:47 AM UTC+1, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
> FYI, I still haven't found the time to look at it…
>
> On Thursday, July 18, 2013 9:26:35
FYI, I still haven't found the time to look at it…
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 9:26:35 AM UTC+2, salk31 wrote:
>
> H. Guess not a lot of demand then. Will hold off doing any more work
> on this.
>
> Cheers
>
> Sam
>
> On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 9:04:53 AM UTC+1, salk31 wrote:
>>
>> https://gi
H. Guess not a lot of demand then. Will hold off doing any more work on
this.
Cheers
Sam
On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 9:04:53 AM UTC+1, salk31 wrote:
>
> https://github.com/salk31/gwt-rf-queue
>
> I've been allowed to open source this and given two hours a week to work
> on it...
>
> I thou
https://github.com/salk31/gwt-rf-queue
I've been allowed to open source this and given two hours a week to work on
it...
I thought it was worth sharing now that it compiles and there is a working
demo. I've grafted it onto the dynatablerf sample and added some controls
to fake auth and network
11 matches
Mail list logo