Re: pango_scan_string() deprecation

On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 17:02 +0100, infirit wrote: > Op 01/05/2017 om 03:39 PM schreef Richard Shann: > > I see that pango_scan_string() is deprecated since version 1.38 > > but the documentation doesn't indicate what it should be replaced with - > > anyone got any ideas? > > See [1] for the

Re: pango_scan_string() deprecation

Op 01/05/2017 om 03:39 PM schreef Richard Shann: > I see that pango_scan_string() is deprecated since version 1.38 > but the documentation doesn't indicate what it should be replaced with - > anyone got any ideas? See [1] for the reasoning. Its now deprecated but from the looks of it there is no

pango_scan_string() deprecation

I see that pango_scan_string() is deprecated since version 1.38 but the documentation doesn't indicate what it should be replaced with - anyone got any ideas? Richard Shann ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org

Re: Accessors vs Properties

Hi, so you mean that the getter/setter usually internally calls the dynamic „property“ version where the property is passed as a string? Thus it would make sense that language bindings are fine using the get/set_property methods since there is no overhead. Best regards, Tobias > Am

Re: Accessors vs Properties

Thanks, do you know what the Python gtk bindings (3.x) are using? Tobias > Am 05.01.2017 um 11:05 schrieb Debarshi Ray : > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:46:13PM +0100, Tobias Knopp wrote: >> - Is any accessor backuped with a property and vice versa? > > Nicola already

Re: Accessors vs Properties

On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:46:13PM +0100, Tobias Knopp wrote: > - Is any accessor backuped with a property and vice versa? Nicola already answered this. > - Which one is to prefer? It depends. For simple setting and getting of values from C, I prefer the accessors because (a) it lets the

Re: Accessors vs Properties

Hi, Il Tue, 3 Jan 2017 22:46:13 +0100 Tobias Knopp scrisse: > ... > - Is any accessor backuped with a property and vice versa? Only the second part stands, i.e. any property should have its own accessors. There is some exception though, e.g. GtkContainer:child, but that is

Re: Accessors vs Properties

Il Thu, 05 Jan 2017 07:27:10 + Gergely Polonkai scrisse: > Hello, > > I don't know about others, but in my own code, my_obj_set_property() does > nothing else just calls the setter functions (and the same for getters). It > makes much more sense, and I saw it in a lot