Oops, this one was a duplicate as it was send out a couple of weeks
back.
Benjamin
On Fr, 2016-03-25 at 18:31 +0100, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Edited minutes are also on.
> * https://wiki.gnome.org/GUADEC/2016/Meetings/20160224
>
> Originals:
> * Minutes:
Hi,
Edited minutes are also on.
* https://wiki.gnome.org/GUADEC/2016/Meetings/20160224
Originals:
* Minutes:
http://meetbot.gnome.org/guadec/2016/guadec.2016-02-24-20.20.html
* Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.gnome.org/guadec/2016/guadec.2016-02-24-20.20.txt
* Log:
On 25 February 2016 at 13:34, Ekaterina Gerasimova
wrote:
> On 25 February 2016 at 13:07, Benjamin Berg wrote:
>> On Do, 2016-02-25 at 12:47 +0100, Tobias Mueller wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Benjamin Berg
On 25 February 2016 at 13:07, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> On Do, 2016-02-25 at 12:47 +0100, Tobias Mueller wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Benjamin Berg wrote:
>> >
>> > * AGREED: regcfp will be our software for registration and CfP unless
>>
On 2016-02-25 14:12, Alexandre Franke wrote:
And the year before. There, proved you wrong. ;-)
True.
I stand corrected.
- Andreas
___
guadec-list mailing list
guadec-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/guadec-list
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> There is this GUADEC curse that magically makes us switch registration
> systems every year.
> Would be kind of cool if we were able to keep the same two years in a row
> for once.
Hmm.
> The regcfp system worked
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Benjamin Berg
wrote:
> I don't want to block a move to something else. However, I don't really
> see schedule archives as a big enough reason to move considering we
> would need someone to:
> * figure everything out (badges, cfp,
On 2016-02-25 14:07, Benjamin Berg wrote:
The advantages of regcfp:
* Seems to work well for us (i.e. paper team, registration/badges)
* People already know the system
* We have the author supporting it for us
There is this GUADEC curse that magically makes us switch registration
On Do, 2016-02-25 at 12:47 +0100, Tobias Mueller wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> >
> > * AGREED: regcfp will be our software for registration and CfP unless
> > this should be revisited for good reasons next week
> As for the CfP system:
> Do
Hi.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> * AGREED: regcfp will be our software for registration and CfP unless
> this should be revisited for good reasons next week
As for the CfP system:
Do we know from the VoCCC how much a frab would make their and our lives
Hi,
unfortunately we had a couple of core people missing. For anyone
interested about the status there is plenty of information in the
minutes :)
Thanks to Kat for cleaning up the minutes and putting them on the wiki:
https://wiki.gnome.org/GUADEC/2016/Meetings/20160224
Benjamin
== People
11 matches
Mail list logo