Hi Willy,
Le 12/11/2014 06:42, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
Hi Cyril,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:48:26PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Lasse Birnbaum Jensen reported an issue when agent checks are used at the same
time as standard healthchecks when SSL is enabled on the server side.
The symptom is tha
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:55:53PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> disable starts a server in the disabled state, however setting the health
> of an agent implies that the agent is disabled as well as the server.
>
> This is a problem because the state of the agent is not restored if
> the
Hi Mark, Hi All,
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 02:59:32PM +0100, Mark Brooks wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Im testing starting the backend servers as disabled in the config
> according to the manual -
> "disabled
> The "disabled" keyword starts the server in the "disabled" state. That means
> that it is
disable starts a server in the disabled state, however setting the health
of an agent implies that the agent is disabled as well as the server.
This is a problem because the state of the agent is not restored if
the state of the server is subsequently updated leading to an
unexpected state.
For e
Make check check used to report explicitly report "DOWN (agent)" slightly
more restrictive such that it only triggers if the agent health is zero.
This avoids the following problem.
1. Backend is started disabled, agent check is is enabled
2. Backend is stabled using set server vip/rip state read
Hi,
this short series is intended to address to cases where the
status of a backend is incorrectly reported as "DOWN (agent)".
Simon Horman (2):
BUG/MEDIUM: Do not set agent health to zero if server is disabled in
config
MEDIUM/BUG: Only explicitly report "DOWN (agent)" if the agent healt
Hi Cyril,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:48:26PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
> Lasse Birnbaum Jensen reported an issue when agent checks are used at the same
> time as standard healthchecks when SSL is enabled on the server side.
>
> The symptom is that agent checks try to communicate in SSL while it s
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 01:45:45PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 10/11/2014 12:54, Lasse Birnbaum Jensen a écrit :
> >Hi all
> >
> >I have a problem with agent checks on a ssl backend (i cannot change the
> >backend to http). This configuration forces the agent-check port expect ssl,
>
I'm answering myself :
Le 11/11/2014 15:04, Hoggins! a écrit :
> Wow !
>
> That's fast ! It's a very positive aspect of HAProxy : its community.
>
> Anyway, thanks for these answers, Baptiste and Lukas. It's almost
> working as expected, except that I guess I need to use some sort of
> Apache's P
Title: 第二十届中国国际家具展览会
2014年12月6-9日中山市灯都古镇会议展览中心
联系我们 / 官方微信 / 网页版
本期亮点:展商预览 现场活动
展会官网
展位预定
免费预登记
官方微信
平面图
Wow !
That's fast ! It's a very positive aspect of HAProxy : its community.
Anyway, thanks for these answers, Baptiste and Lukas. It's almost
working as expected, except that I guess I need to use some sort of
Apache's ProxyPass equivalent, because my new backend does not
understand that query wi
> Hello folks,
>
> I'm not sure what to use, and if it's possible.
>
> I have a website : http://www.radiom.fr. The whole site is served by a
> couple of backend servers. Everything works fine.
> I would like to know if it's possible to have http://www.radiom.fr/foo/
> served by another backend.
>
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Hoggins! wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I'm not sure what to use, and if it's possible.
>
> I have a website : http://www.radiom.fr. The whole site is served by a
> couple of backend servers. Everything works fine.
> I would like to know if it's possible to have http://
Hello folks,
I'm not sure what to use, and if it's possible.
I have a website : http://www.radiom.fr. The whole site is served by a
couple of backend servers. Everything works fine.
I would like to know if it's possible to have http://www.radiom.fr/foo/
served by another backend.
Thank you for y
Thanks !
It is looks like working now.
Thanks
Amir Yosef
-Original Message-
From: jonat...@jpluscplusm.com [mailto:jonat...@jpluscplusm.com] On Behalf Of
JCM
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 12:57 PM
To: haproxy@formilux.org
Cc: Cohen Galit; Yosef Amir; Meltser Tiran
Subject: Re: tcp-ch
On 11 November 2014 10:52, Yosef Amir wrote:
[snip]
> What did I configure wrong ?
>
> server cas1 10.106.26.44:50143
> server cas2 10.106.138.132:50143
As per the docs
(http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.5.html#check),
individual servers are only health-checked
Hi ,
I installed in my lab HA-Proxy version 1.5-dev22-1a34d57 2014/02/03.
I would like HAProxy to check IMAP response (banner) in order to increase HA.
IMAP Server banner is "* OK ProxyIMAP ready to serve you, master" . In order
to run "negative test" I inserted "wrong" string (blabla) but when
17 matches
Mail list logo