Perhaps the trouble is that you're putting HAProxy inside a chroot? Does
/var/lib/haproxy/var/log exist?
Attached!
Dear HA-Proxy support,
I am installing HA-Proxy 1.5 to make load balancing for my 3 Ubuntu servers
(version 14.04) using with Postgresql database
Primary 10.236.49.12:5432
HotStandby 172.24.22.68:5432
AsyncStandby 10.236.134.187:5432
The HA-Proxy is installed on the
Hi Peter,
Le 20/03/2015 00:32, Peter Butler a écrit :
I logged this on stackoverflow
(http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29133477/haproxy-with-multiple-certificates-one-of-which-being-wild-card-and-the-other),
but HAProxy usage there is pretty low.
THis is my first mailing list email in years
I logged this on stackoverflow
(http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29133477/haproxy-with-multiple-certificates-one-of-which-being-wild-card-and-the-other),
but HAProxy usage there is pretty low.
THis is my first mailing list email in years, please let me know if I have
broken any rules.
I
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 02:44:05AM +0530, Saurab t wrote:
> Hello Willy ,
>
> @Baptiste:
> iptables are nor running , irqbalance is running.
clearly irqbalance is the first thing to stop when you're working in
web environments or anything related to low latency. You need to pin
your interrupts b
Hello Willy ,
@Baptiste:
iptables are nor running , irqbalance is running. Will send the 100% CPU
load haproxy stats snapshot, today when load is about to reach peak.
@Willy:
Certainly will go ahead with upgrade.
>http://t55696.web-haproxy.webtalks.info/100-cpu-load-t55696.html
as mentioned on
Dear Friend,
Good news for you.
Xiaomi Note, Dual
Curved Glass,the same user experience with Iphone 6
Plus.Half price of Iphone 6 Plus.
XIAOMI NOTE 5.7" JDI Retina Snapdragon
801 Quad Core HiFi 4G Phone 13MP CAM 3GB RAM 16GB ROM P05-XMNO
1.
Process a
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 02:00:14PM +0100, Baptiste wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Saurab t
> wrote:
> > Hello Willy,
> >
> > Thanks you for your kind response.
> >
> > Here are the information required
> >
> > Haproxy version :
> > HA-Proxy version 1.5.8 2014/10/31
> > Copyright 2
Hi Alan,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:56:35AM +, Alan Fitton wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> Thank you for your reply and your work on HAProxy. I will add some
> instrumentation and hopefully be able to demonstrate your theory. I agree,
> it's the one I had arrived at too :) It seemed unlikely at first
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Saurab t wrote:
> Apologies, here is the information;
>
>
> METAL SERVER
> Kernel : 2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64
> OS: Centos 6.5
> Ram : 32073
> CPU :
> Architecture: x86_64
> CPU op-mode(s):32-bit, 64-bit
> Byte Order:Little Endian
> CPU(s)
Apologies, here is the information;
METAL SERVER
Kernel : 2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64
OS: Centos 6.5
Ram : 32073
CPU :
Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s):32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order:Little Endian
CPU(s):24
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-23
Thread(s) per core:2
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Saurab t wrote:
> Hello Willy,
>
> Thanks you for your kind response.
>
> Here are the information required
>
> Haproxy version :
> HA-Proxy version 1.5.8 2014/10/31
> Copyright 2000-2014 Willy Tarreau
>
>
>
> If this can help As you have already responded to
Hello Willy,
Thanks you for your kind response.
Here are the information required
Haproxy version :
HA-Proxy version 1.5.8 2014/10/31
Copyright 2000-2014 Willy Tarreau
If this can help As you have already responded to two other scenarios :
http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?10,10758
Hi Willy,
Thank you for your reply and your work on HAProxy. I will add some
instrumentation and hopefully be able to demonstrate your theory. I agree, it's
the one I had arrived at too :) It seemed unlikely at first since the signals
are masked inside __signal_process_queue, but it's still pos
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:04:54AM +0530, Saurabh Tiwari wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> we are facing issue of haproxy consuming 100% CPU , we tried different
>> tunings on haproxy cfg . But only solution remains is of making the
>> nbproc
Hi Alan,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 01:11:32PM +, Alan Fitton wrote:
> Basically the signal_queue isn't being updated with a reference to SIGTTOU,
> because signal_state[SIGTTOU].count is > 0. I guess there's an assumption in
> the code that if any given signal already has events counted up in
>
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:04:54AM +0530, Saurabh Tiwari wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we are facing issue of haproxy consuming 100% CPU , we tried different
> tunings on haproxy cfg . But only solution remains is of making the
> nbproc > 1, which is not a permanent solution.
>
> _Pasting the com
17 matches
Mail list logo