On 09/28/11 12:41 PM, Yves Parès wrote:
Yes, but compilation might be damn slow.
I forget about the SheevaPlugs (ARMv5 Kirkwood 1,2 GHz)! They are kind of
cheap for what they offer, it's a very nice embedded platform.
Yes, or you can even attempt to install some ARMv5 linux on ARMv7
platform.
Yes, but compilation might be damn slow.
I forget about the SheevaPlugs (ARMv5 Kirkwood 1,2 GHz)! They are kind of
cheap for what they offer, it's a very nice embedded platform.
2011/9/28 Karel Gardas
> On 09/28/11 11:06 AM, Yves Parès wrote:
>
>> This means not only kernel should be the same (w
On 09/28/11 11:06 AM, Yves Parès wrote:
This means not only kernel should be the same (w.r.t. its
API/functionality) but also standard libc and other runtime libraries.
Yes, this is what I understood. I wasn't talking about portable *binaries*,
just about the ARM platforms which were efficient
Karel Gardas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 09/28/11 10:35 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 28.09.2011, 09:30 +0200 schrieb Karel Gardas:
> >> Please note GHCi support is still missing...
> >
> > which implies that Template Haskell does not work. So if you are
> > considering using TH in
Hi,
On 09/28/11 10:35 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 28.09.2011, 09:30 +0200 schrieb Karel Gardas:
Please note GHCi support is still missing...
which implies that Template Haskell does not work. So if you are
considering using TH in your library when it is avoidable, remember t
> This means not only kernel should be the same (w.r.t. its
API/functionality) but also standard libc and other runtime libraries.
Yes, this is what I understood. I wasn't talking about portable *binaries*,
just about the ARM platforms which were efficient enough to run GHC.
I guessed one would ha
On 09/28/11 10:42 AM, Yves Parès wrote:
So currently, it's okay to make Haskell code that targets Android
smartphones, the Beagleboard, the Raspberry Pi or the OpenPandora as long as
you use the development version of GHC?
No, it's not that easy. As cross-compiling is not working (yet!) then
y
So currently, it's okay to make Haskell code that targets Android
smartphones, the Beagleboard, the Raspberry Pi or the OpenPandora as long as
you use the development version of GHC?
2011/9/28 Karel Gardas
> On 09/28/11 12:47 AM, Anthony Cowley wrote:
>
>> I am not aware of as good a story for A
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 28.09.2011, 09:30 +0200 schrieb Karel Gardas:
> Please note GHCi support is still missing...
which implies that Template Haskell does not work. So if you are
considering using TH in your library when it is avoidable, remember that
you are making your code unusable on most non
On 09/28/11 12:47 AM, Anthony Cowley wrote:
I am not aware of as good a story for Arduino-level development. Atom
may be an appropriate foundation for such an effort, but I also hope
that we can get GHC ARM support sorted out, and then use platforms
like the forthcoming Raspberry Pi as the comput
On Sep 27, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Jeremy Shaw wrote:
> When the robots take over, do you want them to be developed using a sane
> language like Haskell or Agda? Or some dangerous untyped OO language? I think
> the answer is obvious.
>
> The question is, "How?". The robots will not be developed by u
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Jeremy Shaw wrote:
>
> Let's here your ideas!
Here's a post outlining Arduino + Haskell via Atom:
http://leepike.wordpress.com/2010/05/31/twinkle-twinkle-little-haskell/
Atom might be a tool to use for any number of targets, but I haven't
used it so I really don
When the robots take over, do you want them to be developed using a
sane language like Haskell or Agda? Or some dangerous untyped OO
language? I think the answer is obvious.
The question is, "How?". The robots will not be developed by us, but
by the children of today. So, we must reach thei
13 matches
Mail list logo
