Something like the following? (it wasn't tested)
#define ACCELERATOR_VERSION_BASE 7.0.3
#define ACCELERATOR_VERSION_SUFFIX -dev
#iif PHP_EXTRA_VERSION
# define ACCELERATOR_VERSION ACCELERATOR_VERSION_BASE
ACCELERATOR_VERSION_SUFFIX
#else
# define ACCELERATOR_VERSION ACCELERATOR_VERSION_BASE (
Hi Sara,
On 07/31/2013 12:55 AM, Sara Golemon wrote:
At a glance, this looks awesome. There are a few changes where you
introduced #ifdef WIN32 checks that I want to spend a little more time
looking at...
In the WIN32 code there was an additional variable, declared always, but
switched from
Hi,
I'm working on the AOP_PHP extension (http://pecl.php.net/package/AOP dedicated
to bring the AOP paradigm to PHP (may it be evil or not)) and I'm
struggling to make it compatible with PHP 5.5
As you probably expect, as the AOP paradigm is something like a magical
hook, I have to overload the
I agree with both (A) and (B).
However (B) was done on purpose and has its advantages and disadvantages.
Anyway, I've opened https://github.com/zendtech/ZendOptimizerPlus/issues/118
C) file based opcode caching may be interesting as well
but all these requests are going to be a part of next
Hi Julien,
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Julien SALLEYRON
julien.salley...@gmail.com wrote:
If I EG(execute_data) = EG(execute_data)-prev_execute_data, there is no
loop anymore, but I have freeing error
Don't over write EG(execute_data), but use your own pointer when it is
needed.
I
Hi Julien,
Hi and thank you for taking the time to help.
Don't over write EG(execute_data), but use your own pointer when it is
needed. I think this will fix your problem.
The problem here is that I have came to the conclusion (wrong
conclusion ?) that I need to update the
Hi all.
From a recent discussion, we noticed that there is no easy user-level way
to know if a given closure is bindable or not.
Sure, the debatte about https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=64761 is still
open, I dont see why a static closure is not bindable, knowing that a
global scope defined
Ah, yeah, I can see that clearly now. Looks universally cool to me. Do
you just need someone with engine karma to push it?
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Andrey Hristov p...@hristov.com wrote:
Hi Sara,
On 07/31/2013 12:55 AM, Sara Golemon wrote:
At a glance, this looks awesome. There
On 07/31/2013 04:56 PM, Sara Golemon wrote:
Ah, yeah, I can see that clearly now. Looks universally cool to me. Do
you just need someone with engine karma to push it?
right. I have no Zend karma, or at least didn't have at CVS/SVN times.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Andrey Hristov
Hi all!
Tomorrow, August 1st 2013, is the day, it is *my* day.
Some of you might already know [1] that I've been hired as a full-time
PHP core developer by SmugMug. I'll officially start tomorrow.
I hope that I can do a great job for all of us who need and love to
use PHP. I hope that you will
Hi Julien,
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Julien SALLEYRON
julien.salley...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem here is that I have came to the conclusion (wrong conclusion
?) that I need to update the EG(current_execute_data) as if the former
called function had been processed, to actually
Congratulations! One of my life goals is to get paid to work on open source
software so I can definitely understand your excitement. I look forward to
all the good stuff you can help PHP do!
12 matches
Mail list logo