On Oct 4, 2014 4:01 AM, "Andrea Faulds" wrote:
>
>
> On 3 Oct 2014, at 17:21, Thomas Gossmann wrote:
>
> > I was wondering if it is possible to deprecate/remove the function
keyword from class methods in php7 or at least make it optional when one of
the visibility keywords is present?
> >
> > I f
PLANTEAMIENTO.
El seminario es organizado por la OTEC Humánitas, un organismo moderno que
propone una modalidad integrada y dinámica de seminario.
El presente seminario está orientado a toda la organización de una empresa,
pues el Proyecto de Ley de la Reforma Tributaria propuesto, contiene líne
On 10/3/14 4:57 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Easy to implement, too. What are the list’s thoughts? I don’t think it really
> hampers readability much.
>
I disagree. This is a case where verbosity is a good thing. Removing
the word 'function' is akin (pardon the analogy) to arguing the $x is
just
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Thomas Gossmann wrote:
> I was wondering if it is possible to deprecate/remove the function keyword
> from class methods in php7 or at least make it optional when one of the
> visibility keywords is present?
>
No.
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Ingwie Phoenix
wr
2014-10-04 0:06 GMT+02:00 Arvids Godjuks :
> I really have to ask, did you work with really big projects? Like really
> sizeable.
Yes I have and I deal with it, instead of going into grindy small
details about how the code looks like, I work with it and can quickly
adapt to the project I work on n
04 окт. 2014 г. 1:03 пользователь "Kalle Sommer Nielsen"
написал:
>
> Hi
>
> 2014-10-03 22:00 GMT+02:00 Arvids Godjuks :
> > Hello internals.
> >
> > I'm firmly against removing the "function" keyword. PHP is a dynamic
> > language, that means that even using the latest most functional IDE's
out
>
Hi
2014-10-03 22:00 GMT+02:00 Arvids Godjuks :
> Hello internals.
>
> I'm firmly against removing the "function" keyword. PHP is a dynamic
> language, that means that even using the latest most functional IDE's out
> there, finding the implementation is not always few clicks away (PhpStorm's
> "Fi
Hi!
> Easy to implement, too. What are the list’s thoughts? I don’t think it really
> hampers readability much.
It's pretty faint praise - "doesn't hamper much". I think language
feature should do better than not hurting too much. We don't need to
change things and fragment the language just bec
On 3 October 2014 20:04, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> Huh, why is the keyword choice not part of the vote? So, if people vote for
> it with ‘or’, you could change it to something completely different?
>
> I don’t think that’s normal procedure.
Because there currently isn't a choice.
--
PHP Internal
On 3 Oct 2014, at 17:21, Thomas Gossmann wrote:
> I was wondering if it is possible to deprecate/remove the function keyword
> from class methods in php7 or at least make it optional when one of the
> visibility keywords is present?
>
> I feel like writing a completely unnecessary keyword eac
On 3 Oct 2014, at 08:39, Leigh wrote:
> If there are no outstanding issues raised by tonight (UTC), I will
> open this RFC up to a vote.
>
> I'd like to remind everyone that we're discussing and voting on the
> concept here rather than the implementation. I'm personally not happy
> with "or", b
Hi all,
Opening the vote on loop + or control structures.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/loop_or
Voting will close in 1 week and requires a 2/3 in favour to pass.
Remember at this stage the implementation is flexible.
Cheers,
Leigh.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsub
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Arvids Godjuks
wrote:
> Hello internals.
>
> I'm firmly against removing the "function" keyword. PHP is a dynamic
> language, that means that even using the latest most functional IDE's out
> there, finding the implementation is not always few clicks away (PhpStorm
Hello internals.
I'm firmly against removing the "function" keyword. PHP is a dynamic
language, that means that even using the latest most functional IDE's out
there, finding the implementation is not always few clicks away (PhpStorm's
"Find Usages") and you need to do a search in the project. And
Hello :-),
Does anyone know something about this bug:
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=68128 ?
Thanks!
--
Ivan Enderlin
Developer of Hoa
http://hoa-project.net/
PhD. at DISC/Femto-ST (Vesontio) and INRIA (Cassis)
http://disc.univ-fcomte.fr/ and http://www.inria.fr/
Member of HTML and WebApps
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Ingwie Phoenix
wrote:
>
> Am 03.10.2014 um 19:38 schrieb Levi Morrison :
>
> > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Thomas Gossmann
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hey there,
> >>
> >> I'm just a php developer, thus not even having a php.net account.
> >>
> >> I was wondering if
Am 03.10.2014 um 19:38 schrieb Levi Morrison :
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Thomas Gossmann
> wrote:
>
>> Hey there,
>>
>> I'm just a php developer, thus not even having a php.net account.
>>
>> I was wondering if it is possible to deprecate/remove the function keyword
>> from class met
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Thomas Gossmann
wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> I'm just a php developer, thus not even having a php.net account.
>
> I was wondering if it is possible to deprecate/remove the function keyword
> from class methods in php7 or at least make it optional when one of the
> vis
Hey there,
I'm just a php developer, thus not even having a php.net account.
I was wondering if it is possible to deprecate/remove the function
keyword from class methods in php7 or at least make it optional when one
of the visibility keywords is present?
I feel like writing a completely unn
If there are no outstanding issues raised by tonight (UTC), I will
open this RFC up to a vote.
I'd like to remind everyone that we're discussing and voting on the
concept here rather than the implementation. I'm personally not happy
with "or", but if there is enough support during voting then I am
On 26 September 2014 08:58, Leigh wrote:
> Voting is now open for this RFC. Voting closes around this time on the
> 3rd of October 2014.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pack_unpack_64bit_formats
>
> Thanks,
>
> Leigh.
Voting is now closed. RFC accepted with 100% in favour.
Pull request for the impl
21 matches
Mail list logo
