[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16478976#comment-16478976
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-20520:
Results for branch master
[build #334 on
builds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16478203#comment-16478203
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-20520:
Results for branch branch-2.0
[build #309 on
bu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16478197#comment-16478197
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-20520:
Results for branch branch-2
[build #744 on
buil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16477593#comment-16477593
]
Mike Drob commented on HBASE-20520:
---
[~stack] - any activity here?
> Failed effort upp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16471187#comment-16471187
]
Mike Drob commented on HBASE-20520:
---
Left a minor nit on RB, otherwise patch looks good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16462036#comment-16462036
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-20520:
bq.Example please ramkri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16461893#comment-16461893
]
stack commented on HBASE-20520:
---
Thanks [~mdrob] I got a little lost in the hierarchy here.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16461842#comment-16461842
]
Mike Drob commented on HBASE-20520:
---
change makes sense, v5 LGTM.
+1 assuming QA is ha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16461821#comment-16461821
]
stack commented on HBASE-20520:
---
.005 Edit. Fix test.
> Failed effort upping default HDFS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16461702#comment-16461702
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-20520:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16461604#comment-16461604
]
stack commented on HBASE-20520:
---
Add test to verify default takes in both WAL providers. Le
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16461560#comment-16461560
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-20520:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16461468#comment-16461468
]
stack commented on HBASE-20520:
---
bq. You think the too-early log roll maybe had perf impact
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16461427#comment-16461427
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-20520:
In the logs I noticed th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16461416#comment-16461416
]
Mike Drob commented on HBASE-20520:
---
You think the too-early log roll maybe had perf im
15 matches
Mail list logo