[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781837#action_12781837
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2086:
{quote}
I did'nt want to have com
Hi,
> > > shouldn't active code like that live in the application layer?
> > Why?
> You can all but guarantee that polling will work at the app layer
The application layer may also run with low priority. In operating
systems, it's usually the lower layer that have more 'rights'
(priority), and no
As DM Smith said, since the bug is longstanding and we are only now
just hearing about it, it appears not to be that severe in practice.
I guess users don't often mix coord enabled & disabled BQs, that are
otherwise identical, in the same cache.
So I think we ship 3.0.0 anyways?
Mike
On Tue, Nov
> As DM Smith said, since the bug is longstanding and we are only now
> just hearing about it, it appears not to be that severe in practice.
> I guess users don't often mix coord enabled & disabled BQs, that are
> otherwise identical, in the same cache.
DM Smith also wanted this in 2.9.2, which I
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>> As DM Smith said, since the bug is longstanding and we are only now
>> just hearing about it, it appears not to be that severe in practice.
>> I guess users don't often mix coord enabled & disabled BQs, that are
>> otherwise identical, in t
+1 to release the current artifacts as 3.0.0!
Mike
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>>> As DM Smith said, since the bug is longstanding and we are only now
>>> just hearing about it, it appears not to be that severe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781855#action_12781855
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2075:
---
Just one question: The cache is initialized
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781859#action_12781859
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1458:
{quote}
in trunk, things sort in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781863#action_12781863
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2075:
Well, I just kept 1024 since that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2034:
Attachment: LUCENE-2034,patch
Updated the patch to the current trunk.
I have not removed a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2034:
Attachment: LUCENE-2034,patch
set svn EOF property to native - missed that in the last pat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781869#action_12781869
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2075:
---
{quote}
And honestly I'm still tempted to d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781870#action_12781870
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2034:
---
bq. set svn EOF property to native - missed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781874#action_12781874
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1458:
-
{quote}
Though it would be nice to let the code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir reassigned LUCENE-2034:
---
Assignee: Robert Muir
> Massive Code Duplication in Contrib Analyzers - unifly the analyzer
Do we need a new 3.0? (duck) - but it's fixed only at wrong position in
changes.
But we should also fix the 3.0 branch for 3.0.1
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: mikemcc...@apache.org [ma
I have seen, we have the same problem with the next changes entry, 2046 :(
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 12:26
OK looks like you fixed LUCENE-2046 as well, and ported both fixes to
3.0.x CHANGES.
I don't think this merits a 3.0.0 respin.
Though I wonder if there are other issues that got incorrectly moved into 2.9.1?
Mike
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Do we need a new 3.0? (du
I looked through the 2.9.1 changes and found none that was too new.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781876#action_12781876
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2075:
bq. With Query Scope you mean a w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781878#action_12781878
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2075:
OK I opened LUCENE-2093 to track
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781877#action_12781877
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2034:
-
Simon in my opinion it is ok, about making toke
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781880#action_12781880
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2075:
---
I would keep it as it is, because we alread
Use query-private scope instead of shared Term->TermInfo cache
--
Key: LUCENE-2093
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2093
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781882#action_12781882
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2075:
-
i am still triyng to figure out the use case.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781884#action_12781884
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2034:
-
bq. i think you should make those non-f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781885#action_12781885
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2075:
---
...not only AutomatonQueries can be combine
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781886#action_12781886
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2075:
-
Uwe i just wonder if the cache would in practic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781887#action_12781887
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2075:
---
For testing we could add two AtomicIntegers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1606:
Attachment: LUCENE-1606.patch
updated patch:
* don't seek to high surrogates, instead tack on \uDC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1606:
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-1606.patch)
> Automaton Query/Filter (scalable regex)
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1606:
Attachment: LUCENE-1606.patch
sorry, my ide added a @author tag. i need to look to see where to tu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781899#action_12781899
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1458:
bq. i hate binary order in genera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781904#action_12781904
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1458:
-
Mike, I guess I mean i'd prefer UCA order, whic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781908#action_12781908
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2075:
bq. I would keep it as it is, bec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781910#action_12781910
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2093:
If we don't do this in 3.1, we sh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781911#action_12781911
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1606:
---
what is UTF-38? :-) I think you mean UTF-32
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781913#action_12781913
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2075:
bq. Uwe i just wonder if the cach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781914#action_12781914
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1606:
-
i think there is one last problem with this for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781914#action_12781914
]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-1606 at 11/24/09 1:30 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781915#action_12781915
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1606:
-
Uwe, where do you see UTF-38 :)
> Automaton Qu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781916#action_12781916
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2075:
-
Thanks mike, thats what I was missing
hitting t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781917#action_12781917
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1458:
bq. Mike, I guess I mean i'd pref
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781922#action_12781922
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1606:
---
bq. Uwe, where do you see UTF-38
Patch li
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781925#action_12781925
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2086:
Backported to 3.0.x...
2.9.x nex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781924#action_12781924
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1606:
---
about the cleanupPrefix method: it is only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781923#action_12781923
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1458:
-
bq. Ahh, gotchya. Well if we make the sort orde
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781926#action_12781926
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1606:
-
bq. about the cleanupPrefix method: it is only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781927#action_12781927
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1458:
Yes, this (customizing comparator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781926#action_12781926
]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-1606 at 11/24/09 1:44 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2086.
Resolution: Fixed
OK backported to 2.9.x.
> When resolving deletes, IW should res
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781935#action_12781935
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1458:
-
bq. Yes, this (customizing comparator for termr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781938#action_12781938
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1458:
---
...not to talk about TermRangeQueries and N
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781935#action_12781935
]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-1458 at 11/24/09 2:01 PM:
-
Prepare CharArraySet for Unicode 4.0
Key: LUCENE-2094
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Analysis
Affects Versions: 2.9
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2094:
Attachment: LUCENE-2094.txt
This patch contains a testcase and a fixed CharArraySet. Yet t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781947#action_12781947
]
DM Smith commented on LUCENE-1458:
--
bq. Yes, this (customizing comparator for termrefs) w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781950#action_12781950
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2094:
-
Hi simon, at a glance your patch is ok.
I wond
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781953#action_12781953
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1458:
-
bq. I think that String.compareTo works correct
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781959#action_12781959
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2094:
-
Robert, I tried to make it consistent t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781958#action_12781958
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2094:
---
Maybe we put this into UnicodeUtils (handli
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781960#action_12781960
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2094:
-
bq. Maybe we put this into UnicodeUtils
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781962#action_12781962
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2094:
-
Simon definitely, it is not a problem with your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2094:
Attachment: LUCENE-2094.txt
Changed loop to use Charater.charCount()
> Prepare CharArrayS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781964#action_12781964
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2094:
-
bq. btw, I have no idea if there is any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781965#action_12781965
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2094:
-
simon yeah,
I guess what I don't know, is if i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781969#action_12781969
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2094:
-
bq. I guess what I don't know, is if in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781969#action_12781969
]
Simon Willnauer edited comment on LUCENE-2094 at 11/24/09 3:00 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781971#action_12781971
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2094:
-
Simon, yeah i just checked.
all the properties,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781971#action_12781971
]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-2094 at 11/24/09 3:09 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2094:
Attachment: LUCENE-2094.txt
Added some more tests including single highsurrogate chars.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781980#action_12781980
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2094:
-
question of the day - should we use Ver
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781983#action_12781983
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2094:
---
It would not hurt, the Set is only used for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2092.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in trunk, 3.0.x branch, 2.9.x branch. Thanks Hoss!
> Boo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781994#action_12781994
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2094:
-
bq. It would not hurt, the Set is only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781995#action_12781995
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2094:
-
Another option would be to list a back break in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781998#action_12781998
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2094:
-
I would also break compat in LowerCaseF
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782007#action_12782007
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2094:
---
+1 for breaking backwards for these chars.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782009#action_12782009
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2094:
-
Simon, yeah. its tricky you know, like many sup
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-2039:
---
Assignee: Simon Willnauer (was: Grant Ingersoll)
Took over from Grant
> Regex sup
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782015#action_12782015
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1458:
-
{quote}
So this is definitely a back compat pro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782015#action_12782015
]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-1458 at 11/24/09 4:37 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782024#action_12782024
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1606:
-
bq. Patch line 6025.
Thanks for reviewing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782026#action_12782026
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1606:
---
Did he changed the FilteredTermEnum.next()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782026#action_12782026
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1606 at 11/24/09 5:09 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782029#action_12782029
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1606:
-
No, the main thing he did here that i like bett
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782033#action_12782033
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1606:
---
OK, so doesn't affect NRQ, as it uses a dif
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782035#action_12782035
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2075:
{quote}
bq. I am quite sure that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782036#action_12782036
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1606:
-
Yeah, but in general I think I already agree th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782039#action_12782039
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2075:
-
bq. Woops - I was wrong here - Robert's test is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782042#action_12782042
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1606:
---
I think the approach with nextEnum() would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782043#action_12782043
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1606:
-
And I could still use this with "dumb mode"?, j
Hi others,
I was trying to get an account for hudson, but it was refused:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2326
As far as I know, other only-committers of Lucene-Java have already one, so
what should I do?
If somebody with Hudson account would at least beable to change the build
prope
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782046#action_12782046
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2075:
bq. This is my basis for the new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782056#action_12782056
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1606:
---
yes.
> Automaton Query/Filter (scalable re
Hi Uwe,
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, Uwe Schindler wrote:
I have built the artifacts for the final release of "Apache Lucene Java
3.0.0" a second time, because of a bug in the TokenStream API (found by Shai
Erera, who wanted to make "bad" things with addAttribute, breaking its
behaviour, LUCENE-2088)
Here is the rationale for that:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-builds/200911.mbox/%3c4B0C1563.
6050...@apache.org%3e
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:
Yeah, I've seen these rejections before - I don't think the rule makes
any sense, but they only given Hudson accounts to PMC members.
Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Here is the rationale for that:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-builds/200911.mbox/%3c4B0C1563.
> 6050...@apache.org%3e
>
>
Hi Andi
I will add the tag, when it is officially voted for release. If we respin,
the tag would be incorrect (and must be removed and recreated). The release
todo clearly says, that the tag should be added when all votes are there,
and all other did this like this before.
Just one more day and I
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Uwe Schindler wrote:
I will add the tag, when it is officially voted for release. If we respin,
the tag would be incorrect (and must be removed and recreated). The release
todo clearly says, that the tag should be added when all votes are there,
and all other did this like
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
