JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 21
Successful tests: 15
Errors:6
Failures: 0
[time of test: 22 September 2001 7:46 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3
User: tmcsys
Date: 01/09/21 21:24:17
Modified:src/xdocs/howto howtopetstore.xml
Log:
Credit Jim Utter
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +3 -2 manual/src/xdocs/howto/howtopetstore.xml
Index: howtopetstore.xml
User: tmcsys
Date: 01/09/21 21:18:43
Modified:src/docs/doco_files jps112-01.zip
Log:
Update directory structure
Add commit to PopulateServlet.java per Jim Utter
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +97 -84newsite/src/docs/doco_files/jps112-01.zip
<>
> Thank you for the insides.
>
> Somehow -Dcatalina.useNaming=false didn't work;"-nonaming" worked.
Just checked the code ...
My mistake, sorry for the trouble. The main class will only look at the
flag, and set the JNDI sys properties and "catalina.useNaming" accordingly.
Remy
___
I've done that a couple of times myself...;-)
Note the targets tests-unit and tests-stress... the first is reasonably
quick. Also you can put a local.properties file in with
testsuite/build.xml with counts for the stress tests so if you just want to
see if something works... you don't wait all n
It was me. It sure helped to start the server up before I ran the tests the
second time! Sorry to post first and troubleshoot second...
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Jay Walters
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: 9/21/01 10:17 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Tests and new build suite
Sorry to po
Sorry to post this on the list but I can't get to the site to read
instructions... First let me say the new build process is very nice (I've
avoided it during it's teething pains!) How does one run the test suite? I
tried "build test" in the test directory but they all keep failing with what
lo
Try and download objecteering from the softteam.fr site or else
www.objecteering.com. It is very much alive, they have had several releases
in the last 8 months that I have been aware of.
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Ignacio Coloma
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 9/21/01 9:23 PM
Subject:
I'm not sure, but ObjectTeering seem to be marked as Obsolete by the CERN.
At the same time, they have a download version for Win2K. I feel lost.
IMHO Argo and Poseidon are still buggy (but useful in any case, till they
fix them :)
http://sdt.cern.ch/Objecteering/
http://www.softeam.fr/us/pser_t
Thank you for the insides.
Somehow -Dcatalina.useNaming=false didn't work;"-nonaming" worked.
Ma Cheng
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] "java.naming.factory.initial
User: patriot1burke
Date: 01/09/21 14:59:12
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ha/jndi HANamingService.java HAJNDI.java
Log:
it works now
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +1 -77 jbossmx/src/main/org/jboss/ha/jndi/HANamingService.java
Index: HANamingService.java
===
User: patriot1burke
Date: 01/09/21 14:58:47
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ha HARMIServerImpl.java
Log:
added logging
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +5 -3 jbossmx/src/main/org/jboss/ha/HARMIServerImpl.java
Index: HARMIServerImpl.java
Guys,
it seems you all agree on the features to be put in..
here is the deal, please submit patches to "Dain" for the relevant ones we
will be putting out a few RW password, but please go through Dain and he
will give them.
Let's make the CMP stuff as solid as possible it is critical.
marcf
|
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 21
Successful tests: 15
Errors:6
Failures: 0
[time of test: 21 September 2001 21:55 GMT]
[java.version: 1.
Dave Smith wrote:
> 3. Dynamic where clause
> Prompting the user for a search criteria and returning a result set
> based on those criteria. Also would be handy to have cursors/limit.
>
> [snip]
> For 1,3,4 I would propose that we add a special jboss function into the
> QL, something like jboss_
Well after doing some paying work I'm back to looking at and testing the
new EJB 2.0 query methods. I have taken my current application (not
written in EJB) and tried to convert some of it into EJB. I have come
across the following problems/holes in the EJB/QL spec. Below is a
summary of the
Can I use tomcat 4.0 in JBoss Alfa 3.0.0 ?
Like embedded tomcat in JBoss 2.4
Can anybody give me some guidlines how to integrate another WebContainer in
JBoss
Greetz - Tbone
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourcefor
I didn't notice these two in the standardjboss.xml for 2.4.1
> |3. Also change EntityInstanceInterceptor to
> EntityMultiInstanceInterceptor.
> |4. Also change EntitySynchronizationInterceptor to
> |EntityMultiInstanceSynchronizationInterceptor.
d.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Burke [
A jboss hsql embedded patch is submited ...
- would like to move to hsqldb in RH ? and submit to hsqldb ? ... I have
tested hsqldb with RH & red hat -- bank_stress is happy ! ...
/peter_F
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://l
Patches item #463602, was opened at 2001-09-21 09:32
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=463602&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.5 Rabbit Hole (unstable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (n
You're right, the ServiceDeployer stops the mbeans in the same order they
were started, not revers order... will fix later today.
david jencks
On 2001.09.21 10:52:34 -0400 Peter Fagerlund wrote:
> Right now hsql starts and then the datasource -when- undeploying hsql
> close
> and then ds - hmmm
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 21
Successful tests: 15
Errors:6
Failures: 0
[time of test: 21 September 2001 17:3 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3
If you want to use B or C and want the "entity instance per
transaction stuff" follow steps 1-6 below. You can use it for *ALL* beans.
If you want to stay with the pessimistic locking, for your read-only special
case, you only have to change QueuedPessimisticEJBLock to MethodOnlyEJBLock.
I can'
Bugs item #463590, was opened at 2001-09-21 08:50
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=463590&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobo
If you want to get the latest and greatest of 2.4 get Branch_2_4. I have
one major bug fix in there for the new "entity instance per transaction"
interceptors.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
> M Stark
> Sent: Thursday,
RequiresNew should always work. Remember, standardjboss.xml has changed so
you can't re-use old configurations between 2.4.0 and 2.4.1.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Ferguson, Doug
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 7:27
Just start with a security domain name as an attribute of every component
and we can go from there.
- Original Message -
From: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Thoughts on deployers
> Thanks fo
Right now hsql starts and then the datasource -when- undeploying hsql close
and then ds - h ... shouldent ds close before hsql ? ...
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-d
on 1-09-20 22.33, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> your mails are obscure,
good
> what is the problem? do you have a repro case? if so
> go to sourceforge put it in and let us know on the list
My fears of GC was right -or- actually it was about a lingering serverSocket
thread (ServerS
Bugs item #463548, was opened at 2001-09-21 05:29
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=463548&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Christian Riege (lqd)
Assigned to: N
Yes this is the same issue with the application stuff, it is a known
problem. It is also the main reason why we copy.
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
|M Stark
|Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 12:05 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECT
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 21
Successful tests: 15
Errors:6
Failures: 0
[time of test: 21 September 2001 12:7 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3
32 matches
Mail list logo