Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
> Here is a reproducible GC bug with kaffe HEAD. It's a regression, as it does
> not happen with 1.1.5.
>
> This happens when compiling two small programs with the Nice compiler's
> testsuite. Therefore, you'll need the Nice compiler, precis
Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> I've just finished a functional patch for the locking system. I don't
> know yet how much slower it is. But I've already had some interesting
> results with some private app which was not working previously. If noone
> is against I will commit i
Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey,
> It seems that when we don't use iconv there are some problems in
> initializing the EncodingManager. CharToByteConverter.getEncoder needs
> ClassLoader.getSystemResource which needs ClassLoader.staticData.
> However staticData is not yet initia
Hi,
after merging java.lang.Classloader, I tried merging
java.lang.Class and got so far that kaffe passes most
of the regression tests. The attached patch is not yet
ready to go in (I still have to fix the reflection
stuff and do some cleanup), but it is far enough to
decide whether we want somet
Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> looks like we need a lock for locking access to utfLockRoot :(
>
I'd think that the whole utfLockRoot thing is broken (you'd
need one utfLockRoot per thread since it's perfectly legal
for two threads to work on utf8 constants at the same time).
Howev
Kaffe CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> * kaffe/kaffevm/systems/unix-pthreads/syscalls.c
> (jthreadedAccept): Use the old implementation using select all the
> time. It looks like being the only really working way of handling
> timeouts.
have you checked whethe
Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> Here is a patch which changes the way the classes are destroyed and
> implements
> weak references for boehm-gc and kaffe-gc. This fixes class concurrent
> destruction issues which was bugging boehm-gc (and maybe also kaffe-gc) and
> should insure
Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> It looks fine to me. I've made some modifications to makefiles/classlist
> so kjc is still able to bootstrap. So when you have committed your patch
> I'll commit mine.
I've just committed mine, hoping I didn't break too much stuff ;)
Regards,
He
Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that we may skip the marking of thread and its internals but we
> should continue to mark the stack of the thread. So I suggest we move
> the call to TwalkThreads at the beginning of liveThreadWalker and do as
> you have suggested.
Ok, I've c
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 00:11:20 -0800
Kaffe CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
>
> #if defined(HANDLE_MANIFEST_CLASSPATH)
> static int isEntryInClasspath(const char*);
> -static uint8* getManifestMainAttribute(jarFile*, char*);
> +static uint8* getManifestMainAttribute(jarFil
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 21:50:54 +0100
Alexander Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Alexander,
> i have a race condition in thread.c found which (may) causes Kaffe to
> hang - for our L4 system it happens.
[skipping lame excuses for not responding earlier]
thanks for the detailed analysis :)
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:47:46 +0100
Haakon Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> !MESSAGE Save Failed
> !STACK 0
> java.lang.IllegalAccessError: .fElement
>at
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.javaeditor.CompilationUnitDocumentProvider$2.getSchedulingRule
> (CompilationUnitDocumentProvider.java:
Hi,
after passing my last two exams in electrical engineering last
week I finally had the time to look at merging the class loader
implementation from classpath again (sorry for vanishing again).
The attached patch is an updated version (using classpath's cvs
from this morning) and also addresse
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 12:26:06 -0800
Kaffe CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PatchSet 5496
> Date: 2004/11/27 20:21:42
> Author: robilad
> Branch: HEAD
> Tag: (none)
> Log:
> Resynced with GNU Classpath: ResourceBundle updated and remerged with
> Classpath
>
> 2004-11-27 Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL P
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 22:01:55 +0100
Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> With this Eclipse 2.1 starts again, but is not completely usable, while
> printing lots of warning messages... (an alternative would be to
> actually implement setSigners() by adopting the GNU Classpath
> ClassLoade
On Fri, 05 Nov 1999 12:37:07 +
Michael Grunditz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Helmer
>
> On 11/03/04, you wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:45:50 +
> > Michael Grunditz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I have compiled latest kaffe on MorphOS. When I run "java" on
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 01:44:37 +0800
"Bytecode" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 00:16:20 +0800
> "Bytecode" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm optimizing the register allocation mechod in kaffe.
> > I find that the current register allocator spills "dirty" slots in the
> >
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 12:03:13 +0200 (EET)
Jari Korva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> I observed some floating point problems on double data type on my armv5b
> box (float works just fine though). The problem seems to be a
> double/floating point endianness issue.
>
> For example this code: System
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 00:16:20 +0800
"Bytecode" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm optimizing the register allocation mechod in kaffe.
> I find that the current register allocator spills "dirty" slots in the exit
> of each basic block by calling function endBlock(). Why?
Kaffe's register allocator
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:45:50 +
Michael Grunditz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have compiled latest kaffe on MorphOS. When I run "java" on a class I get
> the folowing:
>
> Couldn't find or load essential class `java/lang/Class'
> java.lang.ClassFormatError unknown class file truncate
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 14:49:43 +0100
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here is the build log that fails when trying to build kaffe on ppc with
> gcc-3.4
Could you try without the --with-libffi option
(kaffe should work on ppc without libffi).
Meanwhile, I'll have a look at w
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 08:47:50 -0700 (MST)
Timothy Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > moved handling of thread interruption to jthread layer,
>
> So, I haven't been paying close attention... But, didn't interruption
> used to be in the jthread layer, and then someone moved it up to the java
>
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:29:53 + (UTC)
Riccardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> now the result is
> gmake[6]: Entering directory `/home/multix/kaffe-cvs/netbsd-intrp-
> jthread/test/regression'
> PASS: HelloWorldApp.class.save
> error compiling:
> assertion "size != 0" failed: file "../../../.
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:46:32 -0700
Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 18:53, Michael Franz wrote:
> > What is the status of the x86_64 version of Kaffe? I am running SuSE
> > 9.1 on an Athlon 64 and finding that it fails 134 of 144 tests.
> >
> > How does the x86_64 c
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:00:10 +0300 (EEST)
Jari Korva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there was an additional f0 lurking (see below). Because my Assembly is
> pretty bad, I just removed it blindly - but it made Kaffe to compile!
>
> The resulting Kaffe does not quite work though (throws an N
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 12:55:19 +0200
Thomas Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> I'm currently trying to compile kaffe for the the intel XScale (ARM, Big
> Endian).
> I tried kaffe 1.1.4 as well as kaffe CVS HEAD (20041006). But I've run into
> problems I could not manage to resolve on my own
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 22:15:38 +0900 (JST)
Kiyo Inaba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Kiyo,
> In the current implementation, it looks to adjust SP in eprologue.
> In eprologue, it first calculate frame size by 'op_addal_ia', with
> a label associated with this instruction, based on current FP (the
>
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 18:18:54 +0200
Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jari Korva wrote:
>
> > Third, I'm no longer able to compile cvs head for armv5b.
> > kaffe/kaffevm/intrp/methodcalls.c forces sysdepCallMethod, which causes an
> > ICE.
>
> Thanks for spotting that one. Helmer, any id
On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 11:01:49 +0200
Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Helmer Krämer wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >
>
> Hi Helmer,
>
> >the attached patch moves the handling of trampolines and method
> >calls into engine-specifi
Hi,
the attached patch moves the handling of trampolines and method
calls into engine-specific files, thereby further cleaning up
the core vm:
Each engine provides a header file called methodcalls, which
contains the functions to create trampolines and to call a
java method. The former is used s
Hi,
while having a closer look at the jit3 engine to find out what
broke the m68k backend, I also noticed a few other things that
might help e.g. mipsel.
First of all, move_register() seems to pass wrong values to the
backend's HAVE_move_register_foo:
#if defined(HAVE_move_register_int)
Benja Fallenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi again,
> Helmer Krämer wrote:
> >>The following bug is triggered by the combination of Jikes 1.21 with the
> >>current version of Kaffe from CVS. It is not triggered by Jikes +
> >>sunjava or by sunjavac + K
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:49:06 +0900 (JST)
Kiyo Inaba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi again,
> And again, the two move instructions at 0x293478 and 0x29347c destroy
> the attempt made at 0x293476...
>
> I think similar modification what Helmer showed may solve this problem,
> but I can not figure ou
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 11:59:40 +0200
Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Helmer Krämer wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 09:38:08 +0200
> >Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> >>It seems tha
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 10:00:49 +0900 (JST)
Kiyo Inaba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
sorry for not replying earlier, I had an exam on Friday.
> I made a patch file to solve some problem on m68k jit3. In this patch
> you can find two modifications. The first one is suggested by Helmer
> not to emit
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 19:18:34 -0700
Kaffe CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PatchSet 5005
> Date: 2004/07/24 01:43:27
> Author: dalibor
> Branch: HEAD
> Tag: (none)
> Log:
> Fixed turning off native AWT backends
>
> 2004-07-24 Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Fixed disabling of na
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 09:38:08 +0200
Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> It seems that the Boehm-GC needs to catch a number of pthread calls.
> This is not evident to implement in kaffe but I think I can do the
> following:
> [...]
> Any comments ?
why does the gc_pthread_redirects.h
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:59:23 +0200
Benja Fallenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> The following bug is triggered by the combination of Jikes 1.21 with the
> current version of Kaffe from CVS. It is not triggered by Jikes +
> sunjava or by sunjavac + Kaffe...
what jdk version do you use?
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 02:31:35 +0900 (JST)
Kiyo Inaba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote:
> >I checkouted your version. And it works (which I mean, the compiled
> >version stops at the same place as mine) on m68k/netbsd.
>
> I continuing to debug jit3 for m68k. And if there are someone
> who has
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 19:27:48 +0200
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this simple build.xml file:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (debian unstable 1.1.5 branch)
>
> $ JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/kaffe ant
> Buildfile: build.xml
>
> time:
>
> BUILD FAILED
> /tmp/build.xml:1: java.util.Missin
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:02:06 +0800
Alan Tam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Excuse me, is this a wrong place to file bugs like this?
Yes, I've just checked in a fix, so CVS Head should
work fine.
Regards,
Helmer
___
kaffe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
h
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:33:20 +0200
Fabien Renaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Helmer Krämer wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 14:02:58 +0200
> >Fabien Renaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> >>When I cross
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 21:04:41 +0200
Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> I've been trying to fix the build on mipsel-linux. It uses jit3. I've
> got the LOUT build problem sorted out, the syntax of LOUT and friends
> has changed between jit3 and jit1. The next stumbling stone is
> pro
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 14:40:52 + (UTC)
Riccardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> I was checking the status of the kaffe make system on non-gnu makes.
> Although some makes are known to be very limited, it would be nice if at
> least BSD make and some other know unices makes would work.
>
> I
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 14:02:58 +0200
Fabien Renaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> When I cross compiled I had some problems because there is my native
> dirs in scripts (kaffe, jdb, jar, ...)
What do you mean with "native dirs"?
Regards,
Helmer
___
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 00:06:40 +0200
Benja Fallenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> Weird. Anybody have an idea? Anybody who's checked code in recently know
> something that may have caused this?
Yeah, me. There's a double free in System.initProperties.
Will commit a fix.
Regards,
Helmer
___
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 10:53:51 +0200
Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fabien Renaud wrote:
>
> > Hi !
> >
> > The _make clean_ doesn_t work for me. I only have this :
> > > make clean
> > Making clean in .
> > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/commgw/renaud/commbox/kaffe-cvs/kaffe'
> >
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:16:17 -0400 (EDT)
Rob Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Rob,
sorry for the delay.
> Are you sure that the problem we see there isn't that UnknownElement is in
> the midst of linking when that checkMethodCall() call is made?
More or less. The real problem seems to be
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:17:35 -0400 (EDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rob,
> > What puzzles me is that we already have the CSTATE_DOING_LINK phase
> > during class loading, which seems to be what you want
> [ rest of paragraph deleted ]
>
> I agree, but it doesn't seem to be working. Kaffe is de
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:45:56 +0200
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There also was a discussion with Jim Pick about moving the jni patch to
> C doe so rt.jar would be build only on demand and I'll not have to patch
> the java code. Any idea about how to achieve this? (add /usr/lib/jni t
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:10:22 -0400 (EDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
first a question about the verifier ;)
mergeTypes() contains the following snippet:
mergeSupersets(v, t1, t2);
if (v->supertypes->count == 1) {
*t2 = *TOBJ;
}
else {
Hi all,
the attached patch modifies kaffe's build process a little bit,
so that it executes in roughly four steps:
* build kaffeh, libkaffevm, standard libtool -modules and kaffe
executable
* build rt.jar
* build optional libtool -modules (like awt, sound, libxmlj)
[including generation of
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 21:08:32 +0200
Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dalibor Topic wrote:
> > Guilhem Lavaux wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Hello,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Fabien,
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Me too I cannot compile HEAD, I have the same errors.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Dalibor was on the track f
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 13:26:38 +0200
Fabien Renaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #include "sigcontextinfo.h"
> +
> +#define SIGNAL_ARGS(sig, ctx) \
> + int sig, SIGCONTEXT ctx
That's not quite correct. On ARM, the first four parameters are
passed in registers, and the others are passed on
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:48:07 -0700
Kaffe CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> * kaffe/kaffevm/jni.c
> (tryClassForName): New function to be able to catch exceptions.
> (Kaffe_FindClass): Initialize a user class loader and use it to load
> a class if it has not been
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 14:08:00 +0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> After looking up Helmut Eller's Threaded code interpreter patch
> [1], I attempt to migrate his patch to Kaffe 1.1.x version, and it
> is almost finished, which is attached against kaffe cvs in this mail.
Just some ra
On Sat, 29 May 2004 10:24:22 -0400
Michael Franz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Saturday, May 29, 2004, at 03:36 AM, Alan Eliasen wrote:
>
> >
> > Michael Franz wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> For the past week HEAD has not been building on SuSE 9.1 x86. I think
> >> it started when I had to upgr
On Sat, 22 May 2004 11:44:27 +0900
Ito Kazumitsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> The following program, when compiled with kjc, prints the
> strange message, but runs normally when compiled with Sun's javac.
Compilers are fun, aren't they ?
> [ start of example skipped ]
> private static in
On Sat, 15 May 2004 18:32:39 +0200
Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There will be a slight performance loss for JIT
> though: currently the JIT is putting the pointers to translated methods
> directly in the vtable. To be compatible with intrp and other way of
> handling methods we m
Hi,
I tried compiling CVS Head with kjc and it stopped with this
error:
java/awt/font/TextAttribute.java:44: error:Cannot find type
"AttributedCharacterIterator/Attribute"
I've checked the profile I'm using (allatonce) and it contains
the required entry for java.text.AttributedCharacterIterato
Hi all,
I've played a little bit with gcc 3.x on arm-linux,
trying to get the jit engine working and the results
are somewhat promising.
However, when I run the patched jitter on a strong
arm, it gets a SIGILL and terminates.
So I'm wondering if someone else with access to an
xscale could give
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 20:19:11 +0900 (JST)
Ito Kazumitsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In message "[kaffe] Sockets remain unclosed"
> on 04/03/17, Ito Kazumitsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Summary:
> >
> > When you use Jetty with Kaffe, the number of idle sockets
> > gradually inc
On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 22:18:05 +0100
Holger Schurig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Kaffe on PXA255 runs now, I had to apply the attached patch.
> >
> > The jit engine ?
>
> Yes, if I didn't intermingle all of what I did today at work. I recompiled
> kaffe several times with different ./configure
On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 14:42:29 +0100
Holger Schurig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kaffe on PXA255 runs now, I had to apply the attached patch.
The jit engine ?
Regards,
Helmer
___
kaffe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list
On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 13:34:13 -0800
Casey Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I've gone ahead and implemented translations for fcmpg, fcmpl, dcmpg,
> and dcmpl using C.cond.fmt. This gets me further in loading Kaffe (now
> System.checkPropertyA
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:03:51 +0100
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> hppa:
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=kaffe&ver=2%3A1.1.4-1&arch=hppa&stamp=1077799703&file=log&as=raw
don't really know what's going wrong here. The file
"libraries/clib/math/.deps/BigInteger.Plo" shoul
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:03:51 +0100
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> alpha:
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=kaffe&ver=2%3A1.1.4-1&arch=alpha&stamp=1077763250&file=log&as=raw
this one fails because the alpha backend for the jit
engine doesn't properly unwind the stack. I m
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:03:51 +0100
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> s390:
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=kaffe&ver=2%3A1.1.4-1&arch=s390&stamp=1077762964&file=log&as=raw
this one looks like a simple typo introduced when
sysdepCallMethod was converted into an inline
func
On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 16:05:22 -0800
Mark Maxham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a very simple little program:
>
> I'm running kaffe 1.1.3 on Debian, and I have built the GNU Crypto from
> the latest CVS, as well as Jessie, also from the latest CVS. Here's my
> little test app:
>
> [ ... ]
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 19:46:08 +0100
Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to make ant-1.6.0 work with kaffe and I've stopped on a
> strange problem: it appears that the interface AntMain is loaded twice
> by kaffe. The first time is using the primary class loader, the se
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 18:37:19 +
Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I recall (Dalibor will need to correct me here) forking a process with
> pthreads just plain doesn't work. The details escape me at this point other
> than the complexities of managing the relationship between the
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:34:04 +0100
Gérard Basler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm tring to run kaffe on PXA255. But without any luck so far. I've
> found a similar post concerning PXA250.
> http://www.kaffe.org/pipermail/kaffe/2003-November/044367.html
> Does someone know if kaffe wor
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 09:06:32 -0800
Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > > ":" == Syed Mudasir ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > :>i am try to set up jetty web server
> > :> when i run the following command i get the following
> > :> error
> > :> --- Error --
Hi all,
I tried to find out why it was necessary to modify java.util.zip in
order to get jboss to run, and the results were a bit surprising.
The exception that is thrown when the patch is not applied is this
one:
java.io.IOException: Bogus signature: 0x6d783f3c
at java.util.zip.ZipInputStre
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 17:07:52 +0200
Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Helmer Krämer wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 20:14:38 +0200
> >Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Hi Guilhem, hi Ito,
> >
> >
> >
&
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 20:14:38 +0200
Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Guilhem, hi Ito,
> >The attached programs cause java.lang.IllegalAccessError,
> >which partly seemes to have something to do with KJC,
> >but class files compiled with Sun's javac also cause the
> >error.
> >
> Appar
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:37:03 +1300
"M.Negovanovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 10:23:37PM +0200, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> > >IndexedPropertyDescriptor.java from classpath
> >
> > Unfortunately, this one breaks the Bean.java regression test for me.
> > Could you look into i
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:53:33 +0900 (JST)
Kiyo Inaba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> I said,
> >As the subject line says, configure.in version 1.200 introduced existence check
> >for 'mktemp' command, but it does not change anything for configure script.
> >This command is used in 'kaffe' shell s
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:01:32 +0200
Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Montag, 29. September 2003 07:09 schrieb Guilhem Lavaux:
> > Dalibor Topic wrote:
> > > Kaffe CVS wrote:
> > >> PatchSet 4072 Date: 2003/09/28 19:53:51
> > >> Author
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:12:34 -0600 (MDT)
Timothy Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The attached program causes java.lang.IllegalAccessError
> > when run with kaffe (ChangeLog head: 2003-09-13 Dalibor Topic
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>).
> >
> > When run with JDK
>
> Did you run it with '-ver
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 11:40:07 -0600 (MDT)
Timothy Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Tim,
> > Okie, I've duplicated the problem, the gc is getting stuck and that eats
> > up all the CPU. In particular it gets stuck in startGC() looping on the
> > finalizer list. I tried backing out helmer's
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 17:20:05 +0200
Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 16:23, Helmer Krämer wrote:
> > Whenever kaffe has to load some class
> > using a user defined loader, it invokes the two parameter
> > form of loadCl
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 09:12:44 -0600 (MDT)
Timothy Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > I gave JBoss another try recently and finally got to a
> > point where I really don't know what to do.
> >
> > As you will know, java.lang.ClassLoader contains two
> > different loadClass methods, one that
Hi,
I gave JBoss another try recently and finally got to a
point where I really don't know what to do.
As you will know, java.lang.ClassLoader contains two
different loadClass methods, one that takes a String
and a boolean as its parameters and one that takes
only a String. Whenever kaffe has to
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 18:05:40 +0100
"Thomas Keane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just tried to do the make check again and this time it died here:
>
> mkdir lib
> /bin/sh ./rebuildLib @essential.files
> Compiling classes from @essential.files using
> //root/kaffe/kaffe/kaffe/kaffe-bin -verbosegc a
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 22:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
who knows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> I am working on data memory reference patterns of java
> programs. Basically I want to see memory traces of
> different Java programs running on Kaffe.
>
> I modified the file $ROOT/Kaffe/Kaffevm/mem/gc-mem.c
>
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:12:10 + (UTC)
Riccardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Riccardo,
> I was able to build kaffe on Solaris/Sparc and regression testing
> yielded 7 failed tests,
>
> CLTestConc.failSoInterrupt.fail
> GCTest.failTestUnlock.fail
> NetworkInterface
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:50:16 +0100 (BST)
James Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi James,
> > I'm not aware of anybody working on porting the Classpath AWT, although
> > I think Dalibor is quite active in moving the other parts of Classpath
> > into Kaffe. We've already got several AWTs (X11,
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 10:22:58 -0600 (MDT)
Timothy Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > An idea how to fix this? My guess would be to defer verification
> > of the superclass until after the subclass is in state CSTATE_LOADED_SUPER
> > (and NMS_LOADED). This could probably be done by creating a
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 09:46:31 -0600 (MDT)
Timothy Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Tim,
> > I just committed the bytecode verifier. It's a huge chunk of code and
> > it's very likely that there are little bugs lurking around in it...I can't
> > even count how many off-by-one errors I had during
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 10:24:35 -0600 (MDT)
Timothy Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > > I've checked in some JVMPI stuff. Its not completely done yet, but its
> > > a pretty good start. I'll try and get it finish RSN. Hopefully, i
> > > didn't break anything...
> >
> > thanks! I've tried
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 13:19:12 +0900 (JST)
Kiyo Inaba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> Congratulations for periodical development release for Kaffe. But this
> version may not work for cross environment. The reason is it introduces
> new check for 'in_port_t' and if it fails it tries to determine
>
Hi,
this morning, I wanted to check whether eclipse is still
running with kaffe (rt.jar compiled with kjc). However,
I got this exception (eclipse specific stuff skipped):
java.lang.NullPointerException
at gnu.xml.dom.DomNode.dispatchEvent (DomNode.java:1408)
at gnu.xml.dom.DomNode.inserti
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 10:10:19 +0200
Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >* libraries/javalib/java/lang/Throwable.java: Replaced with Classpath
> >version.
> >* libraries/javalib/java/lang/VMThrowable.java: New class.
> >* libraries/javalib/bootstrap.classlist: Add VMThrowable.
> >*
Hi,
sorry for being pretty silent for the last couple of days, I was
pretty packed with other stuff (being a student isn't all that
funny at times).
The patch I've just commited looks pretty big, but doesn't seem
to cause any serious damage. Basically it does just three things:
* only one versi
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 11:10:46 -0600
Timothy Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> I've checked in some JVMPI stuff. Its not completely done yet, but its
> a pretty good start. I'll try and get it finish RSN. Hopefully, i
> didn't break anything...
you seem to have missed intrp and jit ;)
Wi
On 14 Jul 2003 00:11:14 +0200
Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> - StackTraceElement stuff ("pure java Throwable"). Mark has some
> code hacked up. It compiles... but crashes in spectacular ways.
> -> Goal log4j (used by either JBOSS or Tomcat) uses XMLized stacktraces
> fr
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 23:47:55 -0700
Kaffe CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> Log message:
> 2003-07-09 Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * libraries/javalib/bootstrap.classlist:
> Added missing files. Removed kaffe.lang.Application.
I think we could also delete all the other Application
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 15:51:08 +0200
Helmer Krämer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi again,
> Next problem is a failure in System.arraycopy()
I've just commited a fix for this one.
If I start eclipse with this command line:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=plugins/org.eclipse.swt.gtk_2.1.
On 07 Jul 2003 12:39:04 +0200
Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > From what I know about eclipse, I would assume that the
> > PlatformClassLoader should not be able to find that class,
> > should it?
>
> Actually it should but it does so in a tricky way and then removes (!)
> those
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
