Re: [LegacyUG] To pdf or not to pdf

2009-09-22 Thread Ward Walker
nts, etc. Bill -Original Message- From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com]on Behalf Of Ward Walker Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 2:35 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] To pdf or not to pdf Bill, Adobe Reader is able to add a

RE: [LegacyUG] To pdf or not to pdf

2009-09-22 Thread William H. Boswell
lytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com]on Behalf Of Ward Walker Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 2:35 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] To pdf or not to pdf Bill, Adobe Reader is able to add annotations to a PDF if the appropriate user rights have been applied to the PDF

Re: [LegacyUG] To pdf or not to pdf

2009-09-22 Thread Ward Walker
@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 10:49 AM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] To pdf or not to pdf ... I guess it's up to the user as to what their preference will be later on down the road when you have thousands of images/PDFs. One big advantage of using the PDF files is that you can add not

RE: [LegacyUG] To pdf or not to pdf

2009-09-22 Thread William H. Boswell
Suzanne: I'm a huge creator of PDF files and have been for a number of years. I used to save and scan all of my sources to PDF files because I dislike having tons of paper files. Digital is better. However, over the years when incorporating them into genealogy software they can become quite hea

Re: [LegacyUG] To pdf or not to pdf

2009-09-21 Thread Johnny V
Personally, I use images for photos only and pdf's for all documents. Having images of documented records come up in reports would only bloat reports, whereas citing sources streamlines reports. Just my 2ยข worth If the document is important to your report, then print it out as an attachment. I