On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 4:05 PM, vitalije wrote:
> As I promised in other thread few days ago, that I will write in more
> detail about what I believe to be a better way to make prototype, I am glad
> to report that text is on the web.
>
Not the best time for me to read or respond directly. I n
Hi,
Thanks for your post.
On 17/12/17 08:44, vitalije wrote:
>
> I read all three parts and found it interesting, although it wasn't
>
> Thank you very much for your effort and feedback.
>
>
> So I guess after reading both pieces I get your point more - avoid
> constructing complex
On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 05:44:34 -0800 (PST)
vitalije wrote:
> I agree, contrasting code examples would show more. I was feeling
> uneasy about criticizing Leo's code base too explicitly.
I'm not sure if Leo is the best example to make the comparison, a more
self contained example might make the co
>
> I read all three parts and found it interesting, although it wasn't
>
Thank you very much for your effort and feedback.
>
> So I guess after reading both pieces I get your point more - avoid
> constructing complex state to manage something that is essentially a
> process. At least I thin