On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 01:50:34PM -0600, Douglas R. Reno via lfs-dev wrote:
>
> On 12/13/19 11:36 AM, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote:
> > The vim versions change daily, sometimes multiple times per day. There
> > is a new minor version 8.2.0 as of yesterday, but there is already a
> > (trivial) 8.
On 12/13/19 11:36 AM, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote:
The vim versions change daily, sometimes multiple times per day. There
is a new minor version 8.2.0 as of yesterday, but there is already a
(trivial) 8.2.0001.
There were over 2400 "releases" to version 8.1 before 8.2 was
released. We can
On December 12, 2019 10:17:24 AM CST, Joel Bion via lfs-dev
wrote:
>I agree with what Uwe is saying 100%.
>
>IPv6 use is increasing - right now Google is seeing 24.9% of its
>incoming daily traffic is IPv6, of course a lot of that has to do with
>mobile devices.
>
>But nobody can really ignore
Stick with the x.y.0 is my vote, but my vote is tempered by this uncertainty:
usually, when a team declares a “release” there’s a feature freeze, then
testing with only bug fixes, etc. in other words, a release is different than a
patch. But, is that the case with vim? Or is the “release” just a
The vim versions change daily, sometimes multiple times per day. There
is a new minor version 8.2.0 as of yesterday, but there is already a
(trivial) 8.2.0001.
There were over 2400 "releases" to version 8.1 before 8.2 was released.
We can continue to update to the latest patch version before r