LAB Public License proposal

inclusion. Thanks for your advice JCR aka DJ Anubis -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

Re: LAB Public License proposal

osing some legal mentions on all contractual papers or forms. We had to introduce a section for French Government End Users. In final, CUA Office Public License is great, only missing non USA specific legal information. This license only fills the gap. -- JCR aka DJ Anubis LAB Project Initia

Fwd: Re: LAB Public License proposal

-- Message transmis -- Subject: Re: LAB Public License proposal Date: mercredi 17 Mars 2004 17:14 From: Ernest Prabhakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: DJ Anubis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi DJ, Thanks for your reply - I suggest you repost this to the list, as I thi

Re: LAB Public License proposal

I approved licenses to find one which could be adapted. Most licenses come from USA entities, without this international legal intricacies. This is why we used CUA model as draft for our work. -- JCR aka DJ Anubis LAB Project Initiator & coordinator -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

Re: LAB Public License proposal

. If the facts of the case do not, in any way confer Sounds easier than in France. > Why do you need a choice of law clause in the first place?? (sorry if > you have already answered this - I have not followed this thread t > closely). Maybe this message will give you the answer. -- JCR aka DJ Anubis LAB Project Initiator & coordinator -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

Re: RFD: BSD/MIT-like licence with European clause

ought about it, but > explicitly saying "Yes, I'm responsible and I didn't put in a > trojan horse by will" into the licence text at least has a > psychological effect. French lawyers insist about a certain formulation in contracts. Copyright things and intellectual r

Re: Dual licensing

a particular field cannot be shared. Without closed source AND dual licensing, really free software would never (or at least not before the next glaciation) make its own bed in most companies. The 3 models are acceptable, dual-liecnsing does not really break Open Source paradigms. -- J

Re: Dual licensing

e customers also want to make internal development or internal use which does not fit the GPL or other Open Source license. -- JCR aka DJ Anubis LAB Project Initiator & coordinator -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3