On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:39:28AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/15/13 07:11, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> > This adds a driver for hardware random number generator present
> > on Qualcomm MSM SoC's.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov
> > ---
>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd
Both patches
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 06:00:59PM +, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/29/13 01:21, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > On Oct 28, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> >> The Krait L1/L2 error reporting device is made up of two
> >> interrupts, one per-CPU interrupt for the L1 caches and one
> >> interrupt
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 05:06:45AM +, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/28, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:31:28AM +, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > +
> > > +Optional properties:
> > > +- interrupt-names: Should contain the interrupt names "l1_irq" and
> > > + "l2_irq"
> >
> > As
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 01:12:35PM -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> From: Kenneth Heitke
>
> System Power Management Interface (SPMI) is a specification
> developed by the MIPI (Mobile Industry Process Interface) Alliance
> optimized for the real time control of Power Management ICs (PMIC).
>
> S
On 10/29, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/29/13 01:21, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > On Oct 28, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> >> The Krait L1/L2 error reporting device is made up of two
> >> interrupts, one per-CPU interrupt for the L1 caches and one
> >> interrupt for the L2 cache.
> >>
> >> Cc:
Isn't this the Nexus one platform ? Same as the last one , why don't you
just update it to use the device tree? This doesn't seem like it would
be all that difficult.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 01:43:26PM -0700, David Brown wrote:
> The MSM8x50 SoC support was added in 2010 based on code from Go
Why wouldn't you just update it to use the device tree ? There are lots
of phones our there using 7x30 ..
This is one that Qualcomm specifically upstreamed, so what was the point
of upstreaming it ?
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 01:43:25PM -0700, David Brown wrote:
> The MSM7x30 SoC support was adde
On 10/29/13 13:48, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:31:25PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> We only setup a workqueue for edac devices that use the polling
>> method. We still try to cancel the workqueue if an edac_device
>> uses the irq method though. This causes a warning from de
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:31:25PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> We only setup a workqueue for edac devices that use the polling
> method. We still try to cancel the workqueue if an edac_device
> uses the irq method though. This causes a warning from debug
> objects when we remove an edac device:
>
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 01:20:13PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/29/13 13:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 01:09:27PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> On 10/28, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pm8xxx.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pm8xxx.c
> >>> index 03f
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/29/13 01:21, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Oct 28, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>
>>> The Krait L1/L2 error reporting device is made up of two
>>> interrupts, one per-CPU interrupt for the L1 caches and one
>>> interrupt for the L2
On 10/29/13 13:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 01:09:27PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 10/28, Josh Cartwright wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pm8xxx.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pm8xxx.c
>>> index 03f8f75..a9044d4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pm8xxx.c
>>> +++ b/driver
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 01:09:27PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/28, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pm8xxx.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pm8xxx.c
> > index 03f8f75..a9044d4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pm8xxx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pm8xxx.c
> > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> > /* C
On 10/28, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pm8xxx.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pm8xxx.c
> index 03f8f75..a9044d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pm8xxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pm8xxx.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> /* Copyright (c) 2010-2011, Code Aurora Forum. All rights reserved.
> + * Copyri
On 10/29/2013 04:56 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
>>> +{
>>> + int dummy;
>>> +
>>> + if (!ctrl)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + dummy = device_for_each_child(&ctrl->dev, NULL,
>>> + spmi_ctrl_remove_device);
>>> + device_unregister(&ctrl->dev);
>>
>
On 10/29/2013 05:30 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/29/13 08:56, Josh Cartwright wrote:
>>
+#define to_spmi_controller(d) container_of(d, struct spmi_controller, dev)
>>> Should be a inline function for better type safety.
>> Sounds good. Will change the to_spmi_*() macros.
>
> I was under t
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:39:45AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Daniel Walker wrote:
>
> > Personally I think splitting mach- stuff isn't very useful or
> > interesting.. There's just no technical reason for it, for example x86
> > and x86_64 was a win from my
* Olof Johansson [131029 10:40]:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Daniel Walker wrote:
>
> > Personally I think splitting mach- stuff isn't very useful or
> > interesting.. There's just no technical reason for it, for example x86
> > and x86_64 was a win from my perspective , there's a lot mo
On 10/29/13 01:21, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
>> The Krait L1/L2 error reporting device is made up of two
>> interrupts, one per-CPU interrupt for the L1 caches and one
>> interrupt for the L2 cache.
>>
>> Cc:
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
>> ---
>> ..
Hi,
On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 11:26 -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 05:02:03PM +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 13:12 -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > > From: Kenneth Heitke
> > >
> > > System Power Management Interface (SPMI) is a specification
> > >
On 10/25, Andy Gross wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/Kconfig b/drivers/dma/Kconfig
> index f238cfd..a71b415 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/dma/Kconfig
> @@ -364,4 +364,13 @@ config DMATEST
> Simple DMA test client. Say N unless you're debugging a
> DMA Device d
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Daniel Walker wrote:
> Personally I think splitting mach- stuff isn't very useful or
> interesting.. There's just no technical reason for it, for example x86
> and x86_64 was a win from my perspective , there's a lot more reason to
> keep similar things together
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 08:37:28AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> I would be very happy to take more code for the older Qualcomm chipset
> to enable full functionality for them, but it's been my impression
> that far from all that is needed to make it a useful platform is in
> the upst
On 10/28/13 11:12, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..a03835f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +#
> +# SPMI driver configuration
> +#
> +menuconfig SPMI
> + bool "SPMI support"
On 10/29/13 08:56, Josh Cartwright wrote:
>
>>> +#define to_spmi_controller(d) container_of(d, struct spmi_controller, dev)
>> Should be a inline function for better type safety.
> Sounds good. Will change the to_spmi_*() macros.
I was under the impression that container_of() already does type
ch
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 05:02:03PM +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 13:12 -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > From: Kenneth Heitke
> >
> > System Power Management Interface (SPMI) is a specification
> > developed by the MIPI (Mobile Industry Process Interface) Alliance
> > opti
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 08:56:05AM -0700, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, Josh Cartwright wrote:
>
> > The Qualcomm 8941 and 8841 PMICs are components used with the Snapdragon
> > 800 series SoC family. This driver exists largely as a glue mfd component,
> > it exists to be an owner of an
Hey Lars-
Thanks for the feedback. CC'ing Ivan, since he had the same feedback
regarding the PM callbacks.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 04:21:28PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> Couple of high-level comments on the in-kernel API.
>
> On 10/28/2013 07:12 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > +#ifdef CON
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> The Qualcomm 8941 and 8841 PMICs are components used with the Snapdragon
> 800 series SoC family. This driver exists largely as a glue mfd component,
> it exists to be an owner of an SPMI regmap for children devices
> described in device tree.
>
> Si
Daniel,
I would be very happy to take more code for the older Qualcomm chipset
to enable full functionality for them, but it's been my impression
that far from all that is needed to make it a useful platform is in
the upstream kernel, and there's been no signs of more of it showing
up at least in
Hi,
On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 10:05 -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 04:18:35PM +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 13:12 -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > > Document the bindings used to describe the Qualcomm 8x41 PMICs.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Josh Ca
Couple of high-level comments on the in-kernel API.
On 10/28/2013 07:12 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static int spmi_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + const struct dev_pm_ops *pm = dev->driver ? dev->driver->pm : NULL;
> +
> + if (pm)
> + return
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 04:08:29PM +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 13:12 -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright
> > ---
> > .../bindings/spmi/qcom,spmi-pmic-arb.txt | 42
> > ++
> > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
> >
Hi Josh,
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 13:12 -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> From: Kenneth Heitke
>
> System Power Management Interface (SPMI) is a specification
> developed by the MIPI (Mobile Industry Process Interface) Alliance
> optimized for the real time control of Power Management ICs (PMIC).
>
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 04:18:35PM +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 13:12 -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > Document the bindings used to describe the Qualcomm 8x41 PMICs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/pm8x41.txt | 3
Hi Josh,
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 13:12 -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> Document the bindings used to describe the Qualcomm 8x41 PMICs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/pm8x41.txt | 33
>
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
Hi Josh,
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 13:12 -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright
> ---
> .../bindings/spmi/qcom,spmi-pmic-arb.txt | 42
> ++
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/qcom
That's not very nice .. You know there is a device connect with this
that several of us have..
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 01:43:24PM -0700, David Brown wrote:
> Support for the MSM7x00 SoCs was added starting in 2008 based on code
> from Google's Android kernels. Platform support is fairly minimal
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> In the near future we're going to use these percpu irq functions
> in the Krait CPU EDAC driver. Export them so that the EDAC driver
> can be compiled as a module.
>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner
Pleas
On Oct 28, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> The Krait L1/L2 error reporting device is made up of two
> interrupts, one per-CPU interrupt for the L1 caches and one
> interrupt for the L2 cache.
>
> Cc:
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,krait-cache-erp
40 matches
Mail list logo
