Re: btrfs: Error removing orphan entry, stopping orphan cleanup. could not do orphan cleanup -22

2013-02-06 Thread Marguerite Su
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 4:45 AM, Josef Bacik wrote: > Ok so I think we've fixed this already, can you build btrfs-next and try > mounting with that and see if it fixes the problem? Thanks, Hi, Josef, Is there any btrfs git compatible with kernel 3.7 and absorbs this fix? So I can dkms it, I'm us

Re: btrfs: Error removing orphan entry, stopping orphan cleanup. could not do orphan cleanup -22

2013-02-05 Thread Marguerite Su
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Josef Bacik wrote: > Eesh can you fpaste this, it got wrapped by your mailer and I can't read it. > Thanks, Hi, Josef, Of course, http://paste.opensuse.org/80508108 I at first thought pasting here may help archive. but Gmail sucks...sorry! Marguerite -- To unsub

Re: unrecognized mount option 'compression=lzo' and defragment -c errors

2012-10-20 Thread Marguerite Su
Hi, cwillu, I have my filesystems mounted with compress=lzo and inode_cache. now the only problem is, I can't "btrfs filesystem defragment -c /dev/sda5" which says: earth:/home/marguerite # btrfs filesystem defragment -clzo /dev/sda5 ERROR: defrag range ioctl not supported in this kernel, please

Re: unrecognized mount option 'compression=lzo' and defragment -c errors

2012-10-20 Thread Marguerite Su
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 8:44 AM, cwillu wrote: > Neither io_cache nor compression=lzo are options that exist. You > probably meant compress=lzo for the first, but I really don't know > what you wanted for io_cache (inode_cache? that's not really a > performance thing) > > You need to check what

unrecognized mount option 'compression=lzo' and defragment -c errors

2012-10-20 Thread Marguerite Su
Hi, I planned to boost my btrfs performance today. here some errors I met: my 'btrfs filesystem show' result: ~ # btrfs filesystem show failed to read /dev/sr0 Label: none uuid: 9b9aa9d9-760e-445c-a0ab-68e102d9f02e Total devices 1 FS bytes used 36.59GB devid1 size 49.52GB us

Re: initramfs take a long time to load[135s]

2012-10-19 Thread Marguerite Su
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 2:35 AM, cwillu wrote: > Without space_cache (once), btrfs has to repopulate that information > the slow way every mount; with it, it can just load the data from the > last unmount (modulo some consistency checks). > > The setting is sticky, so you don't actually need it in

Re: initramfs take a long time to load[135s]

2012-10-19 Thread Marguerite Su
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 2:26 AM, cwillu wrote: > That would work, but it's only necessary to mount with it once (and > it's probably been done already with /home), hence the -o > remount,space_cache Now my kernel loads in 10s, another 4s for userspace...then -.mount and all the systemd services.

Re: initramfs take a long time to load[135s]

2012-10-19 Thread Marguerite Su
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 12:55 AM, cwillu wrote: > It appears space_cache isn't enabled on your rootfs; can you do a > "mount / -o remount,space_cache", sync a couple times, make some > coffee, and then reboot, and see if it's better? > > You should see two instances of "btrfs: disk space caching i

Re: initramfs take a long time to load[135s]

2012-10-19 Thread Marguerite Su
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 12:55 AM, cwillu wrote: > It appears space_cache isn't enabled on your rootfs; can you do a > "mount / -o remount,space_cache", sync a couple times, make some > coffee, and then reboot, and see if it's better? > > You should see two instances of "btrfs: disk space caching i

Re: initramfs take a long time to load[135s]

2012-10-19 Thread Marguerite Su
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:41 PM, cwillu wrote: > Also, next time just put the output directly in the email, that way > it's permanently around to look at and search for. Hi, I did it. here's my dmesg: [ 25.623660] SysRq : Show Blocked State [ 25.623667] taskPC sta

Re: initramfs take a long time to load[135s]

2012-10-19 Thread Marguerite Su
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:41 PM, cwillu wrote: > You need to hit alt-sysrq-w during the slowness you're trying to > instrument; the pastebin is from an hour later. > > Also, next time just put the output directly in the email, that way > it's permanently around to look at and search for. Thanks

Re: initramfs take a long time to load[135s]

2012-10-19 Thread Marguerite Su
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > If it isn't the free space cache, it'll be a fragmentation problem. The > easiest way to tell the difference is to get a few sysrq-w snapshots > during the boot. Hi, Chris, with some help from openSUSE community, I learnt what's sysrq snapsh

Re: initramfs take a long time to load[135s]

2012-10-18 Thread Marguerite Su
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > > Usually when btrfs is slow to mount, or slow right after a mount it is > because we're regenerating the free space cache. This is slow enough > that you should be able to see the free space cache threads active even > after the initial boot

initramfs take a long time to load[135s]

2012-10-18 Thread Marguerite Su
Hi, all, I ran into a situation that no useful information can be found over the internet... I'm using 3.6.2 + btrfs git compiled using dkms, and I have a 300GB btrfs /home and 50GB btrfs /: Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders, total 195352