On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 22:08, Omer Zak wrote:
> There is a special blog article devoted to this subject:
> http://elephant.org.il/translate/davka.html
>
> --- Omer
>
I think that I've finally found the word in English: poetic. See here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poetic_justice
Also, in the m
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:08, Shai Berger wrote:
> Hi Dotan,
>
> Sorry about the delay in getting back to you -- I just returned from a
> vacation.
>
> There's a little too little context here for me to understand what the
> discussion is about, or how I can help; I sincerely hope I can. Please n
The result leaves a bit to be desired:
1) The promised two buttons for determining the justification
direction are nowhere to be seen (yes, I have checked that box for
displaying them).
Customize the toolbars (for the main 3-pane window and for the
composition window) and you ca
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 08:28, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> On the practical level, many implementations (Windows' edit control
> included) do line breaks and only then BiDi. As a result, all state is
> lost at the end of the line, and the RLE only covers the first line of
> the paragraph. Since most
On 08/19/2011 08:13 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> Really? Was is the effect of embedding paragraph direction in HTML?
> What is the effect of the character that I posted? How do they differ?
On the theoretical level, an RLE at the beginning of the paragraph means
to embed an RTL run inside the paragra
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 08:04, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> On 08/19/2011 12:52 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>
>> 2011/8/18 Shachar Shemesh :
>>> Since there is no way to embed
>>> paragraph direction (and other changes) in text only,
>>>
>> Yes there is, just put this non-printing character at the
>> begin
On 08/19/2011 12:52 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> 2011/8/18 Shachar Shemesh :
>> Since there is no way to embed
>> paragraph direction (and other changes) in text only,
>>
> Yes there is, just put this non-printing character at the
> beginning of your RTL emails: - -
>
Doesn't do the same thing, neith
2011/8/18 Shachar Shemesh :
> Since there is no way to embed
> paragraph direction (and other changes) in text only,
>
Yes there is, just put this non-printing character at the
beginning of your RTL emails: - -
--
Dotan Cohen
http://gibberish.co.il
http://what-is-what.com
On Thursday 18 August 2011 22:08:29 Omer Zak wrote:
> There is a special blog article devoted to this subject:
> http://elephant.org.il/translate/davka.html
It's not harder to translate than any other word. It's only necessary to
think what one wants to say, which not everyone does. As I said ear
On 08/18/2011 10:53 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> Shachar, your mailing in mungling quoted replies. The past three
> levels of quotes all came out as single gr's. I fixed them manually
> below to preserve context.
for some reason, latest thunderbirds (hurrah, we came back on topic!)
refuses to default
Shachar, your mailing in mungling quoted replies. The past three
levels of quotes all came out as single gr's. I fixed them manually
below to preserve context.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 21:57, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>> Your previous post explaining why RLM and LRM
>> were not included was very cle
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 22:08, Omer Zak wrote:
> There is a special blog article devoted to this subject:
> http://elephant.org.il/translate/davka.html
>
> --- Omer
>
Nice, thanks.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://gibberish.co.il
http://what-is-what.com
___
L
There is a special blog article devoted to this subject:
http://elephant.org.il/translate/davka.html
--- Omer
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 21:38 +0300, Stan Goodman wrote:
> On Thursday 18 August 2011 21:06:40 Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > [1] How to say דווקא in English?
>
> The word is obviously related to
On 08/18/2011 09:06 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 18:12, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I
didn't assume anything, all the facts that I mention are referred to
here (your site):
http://www.lingnu.com/en/howto/78-si1452.
On Thursday 18 August 2011 21:06:40 Dotan Cohen wrote:
> [1] How to say דווקא in English?
The word is obviously related to e,g, דייק, and that's the clue. How to
translate it depends on the sentence, but I usually find that it fits
with "precisely", or "specifically", or something similar. This
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 18:12, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> I
>> didn't assume anything, all the facts that I mention are referred to
>> here (your site):
>> http://www.lingnu.com/en/howto/78-si1452.html
>>
>
> As for the actual criticism, when you've shown that you understood WHY
> the decisions wer
On 08/15/2011 11:54 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 22:19, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>> I suggest that you tap the existing resources, that clearly document the
>> reasons behind both decisions, rather than assume (incorrectly, I might
>> add) stuff about it, and then fling it around
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 22:19, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> I suggest that you tap the existing resources, that clearly document the
> reasons behind both decisions, rather than assume (incorrectly, I might
> add) stuff about it, and then fling it around like it was a curse-word.
>
I meant to be hars
On 08/14/2011 08:05 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> At least the LRM and RLM are there. There are some issues with the new
> keyboard layout:
> 1) The lack of LRE/RLE/PDF. What is violent about the change of
> appearance? Like any other tool, if one understands how to use it then
> it works. If not then
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 07:53, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> I should point out that the document is somewhat out of date, as we are
> quickly approaching a keyboard layout that:
>
> 1. Will be standard
> and
> 2. Will have all of the keys that lyx has.
>
How does an upcoming standard make the page so
On 08/13/2011 08:42 PM, Alan Yaniger wrote:
> One tangential note to Dotan's article regarding inserting non-printing
> characters:
>
> In OpenOffice, you can use "Insert->Formatting Mark", which gives you a
> handy submenu of such characters. This is more convenient than using
> "Insert->Special
2011/8/13 Alan Yaniger :
> One tangential note to Dotan's article regarding inserting non-printing
> characters:
>
> In OpenOffice, you can use "Insert->Formatting Mark", which gives you a
> handy submenu of such characters. This is more convenient than using
> "Insert->Special Character", which re
Please forgive the top-posting. I think anything else would be cruel in
this case.
The quoted message is entirely in HTML formatting. I don't know why
anybody uses HTML in email, but it is altogether out of place in list
traffic. It is worse in this case, because the message contains no
plain-
One tangential note to Dotan's article regarding inserting
non-printing characters:
In OpenOffice, you can use "Insert->Formatting Mark", which gives
you a handy submenu of such characters. This is more convenient than
using "Insert->Special Character", which requir
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 23:01, Stan Goodman wrote:
> I tried Thunderbird for about a month and concluded that I don't like
> it. De gustibus non est disputandum. I'm back to Kmail now, with
> enhanced respect for it.
>
טעם וריח.
(I had to google it)
> As for problems of text orientation, includ
On Friday 12 August 2011 18:58:40 you wrote:
> With all the respect to Thuderbird, I moved to Gmail and Google Apps
> years ago. I recommend using Gmail or Google Apps for email. Then
> you can use any computer to read and write mail, not just at home or
> your laptop.
>
> Uri Even-Chen
> Mobile P
Hi Uri,
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:58:40 +0300
Uri Even-Chen wrote:
> With all the respect to Thuderbird, I moved to Gmail and Google Apps years
> ago. I recommend using Gmail or Google Apps for email. Then you can use any
> computer to read and write mail, not just at home or your laptop.
>
the p
With all the respect to Thuderbird, I moved to Gmail and Google Apps years
ago. I recommend using Gmail or Google Apps for email. Then you can use any
computer to read and write mail, not just at home or your laptop.
Uri Even-Chen
Mobile Phone: +972-50-9007559
E-mail: u...@speedy.net
Website: http
2011/8/4 Tomer Cohen :
> And if you want to see the RTL composition feature embedded to Thunderbird
> in the future, please comment on the following two bugs and mention how
> important is this feature to you:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464436
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show
Hi,
I'm CCing the addon maintainer, maybe he have some good answers for you all.
In case Eyal is not subscribed to the list, his comments might be held for
moderation. (Eyal - You can read the full discussion here:
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/pipermail/linux-il/2011-August/thread.html)
Anyway, n
On 08/04/2011 08:58 PM, Moish wrote:
On 04/08/2011 18:52, Stan Goodman wrote:
On 08/04/2011 07:01 PM, Moish wrote:
Open the xpi file and change the max version in the rdf file.
I've opened the xpi and rdf files. The relevant part of the latter is:
*
{3550f703-e582-4d05-9a08-453d09bdfd
On 04/08/2011 18:52, Stan Goodman wrote:
On 08/04/2011 07:01 PM, Moish wrote:
Open the xpi file and change the max version in the rdf file.
I've opened the xpi and rdf files. The relevant part of the latter is:
*
{3550f703-e582-4d05-9a08-453d09bdfdc6}
2.0
5.*
*
TB is v5.0. BiDi
On 08/04/2011 07:01 PM, Moish wrote:
Open the xpi file and change the max version in the rdf file.
I've opened the xpi and rdf files. The relevant part of the latter is:
*
{3550f703-e582-4d05-9a08-453d09bdfdc6}
2.0
5.*
*
TB is v5.0. BiDi seems t
On 04/08/2011 16:27, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 08/04/2011 04:36 PM, Stan Goodman wrote:
On 08/04/2011 03:58 PM, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 08/04/2011 03:23 PM, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 03:17:36PM +0300, Stan Goodman wrote:
So far, I have not found a way to write a He
On 08/04/2011 04:36 PM, Stan Goodman wrote:
On
08/04/2011 03:58 PM, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 08/04/2011 03:23 PM, Yedidyah
Bar-David wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 03:17:36PM
+0300, Stan Goodman wrote:
On 08/04/2011 03:23 PM, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 03:17:36PM +0300, Stan Goodman wrote:
>> So far, I have not found a way to write a Hebrew message with lines
>> beginning at the right side of the window. With Kmail it was obvious
>> --- there were buttons for right, left
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 03:23:22PM +0300, shimi wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Stan Goodman
> wrote:
>
> > So far, I have not found a way to write a Hebrew message with lines
> > beginning at the right side of the window. With Kmail it was obvious ---
> > there were buttons for right, l
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Stan Goodman wrote:
> So far, I have not found a way to write a Hebrew message with lines
> beginning at the right side of the window. With Kmail it was obvious ---
> there were buttons for right, left, and center positioning. Where is
> something equivalent in Thun
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 03:17:36PM +0300, Stan Goodman wrote:
> So far, I have not found a way to write a Hebrew message with lines
> beginning at the right side of the window. With Kmail it was obvious
> --- there were buttons for right, left, and center positioning.
> Where is something equivalen
So far, I have not found a way to write a Hebrew message with lines
beginning at the right side of the window. With Kmail it was obvious ---
there were buttons for right, left, and center positioning. Where is
something equivalent in Thunderbird?
--
Stan Goodman
Qiryat Tiv'on
Israel
__
40 matches
Mail list logo