On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:52:17AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> ...
> tags
> 4 days agov2.6.24-rc3 Linux 2.6.24-rc3
> 2 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc2 Linux 2.6.24-rc2
> 4 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc1 Linux 2.6.24-rc1
> 6 weeks ago v2.6.23 Linux 2.6.23
>
> which drives me crazy, b
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 03:20:42PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> I see gitweb is much more usable (faster) than a few months ago, but
> there is one thing a bit problematic: in the history of patches I'm
> very often interested in which kernel version of Linus' tree the patch
> appeared fo
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 04:15:45PM CET, Len Brown wrote:
> > > This header files are part of the linux kernel, and thus of course
> > > available in /usr/include/{asm,linux}.
>
> So you pick up all of the kernel include/linux and include/asm*?
> (but exclude include/acpi/, which is as much a kerne
Hello,
I've released cogito-0.18.2, bringing a couple of bugfixes and a trivial new
feature to cogito-0.18.1. Still nothing too groundshattering.
* cg-log does not follow history across renames anymore; it never really
actually worked and was instead causing problems and random error
mess
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 03:48:35AM CEST, I got a letter
where Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> >>>>> Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I've just added to git-pasky a possibility to refer to branc
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 01:01:13AM CEST, I got a letter
where [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
> But now I need a way to indicate to consumers of the public shared object
> data base which HEAD to use.
>
> Perhaps I should just say "merge 821376bf15e692941f9235f13a14987009fd0b10
> fro
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 01:22:01AM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Hi!
Hi,
> > > > You should put this into .git/remotes
> > > >
> > > > linus
> > > > rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
> >
> > (git
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 01:19:47AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> So in the long run this issue goes away - we'll just have synchronization
> tools that won't get any unnecessary pollution. But in the short run I
> actually check my git
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 12:29:07AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I can't quite see how to manage multiple "heads" in git. I notice that in
> > your tree on kernel.org that .git/HEAD
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:55:43PM CEST, I got a letter
where [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
> I can't quite see how to manage multiple "heads" in git. I notice that in
> your tree on kernel.org that .git/HEAD is a symlink to heads/master ...
> perhaps that is a clue.
>
> I'd like
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:38:11PM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Hi!
>
> It seems that someone should write "Kernel hacker's guide to
> git"... Documentation/git.txt seems like good place. I guess I'll do
> it.
I've also started writing
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 09:00:09PM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Hi!
Hi,
> > > Well, not sure.
> > >
> > > I did
> > >
> > > git track linus
> > > git cancel
> > >
> > > but Makefile still contains -rc2. (Is "git cancel" right way to
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 02:03:27PM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > You should put this into .git/remotes
> >
> > linus
> > rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
(git addremote is preferred for that
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:04:48AM CEST, I got a letter
where Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Then, the flurry of patching file blah messages, followed by a rather
> pregnant pause after the last patching message.
>
> I wasn't complaining about the 4 minutes, just th
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:38:17AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Just say no to patches.
FYI, I've - per Junio's suggestion - made git merge's fast-forward to
apply show-diff output as a patch instead. This is roughly equal to
doing th
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:45:02AM CEST, I got a letter
where Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> >>>>> "PB" == Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> PB> I'm wondering if doing
>
> PB> if [ &quo
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 10:20:47PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Pasky? Can you check my latest git stuff, notably read-tree.c and the
> changes to git-pull-script?
I've made git merge to use read-tree -m, HTH.
I will probably not buy
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:19:01AM CEST, I got a letter
where Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> >On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> >>Nice, it looks like the merge of this tree, and my usb tree worked just
> >>fine.
> >
> >
> >Yup, it a
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:04:37PM CEST, I got a letter
where Igor Shmukler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> We HAVE to intercept system calls.
Why? What do you need to do?
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
C++: an octopus made by
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 09:15:00PM CEST, I got a letter
where [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
> From: Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Linus stopped merging stuff to his kernel for few days in order to
> > develop his (at least temporary) alternative to BK,
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:33:45PM CEST, I got a letter
where Maciej Soltysiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Hi,
Hello,
> Is there currently a kernel tree that Linus is working ?
> I mean, now that we have 2.6.12-rc2 not being
> developed with BK, is that code getting fixes an
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:15:37PM CEST, I got a letter
where Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> hi,
Hello,
> I got the terminology mixed up. I guess what I really want to know is,
> what are the different types of exploits by which rootkits
> (specifically the ones that mo
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:03:07PM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > I tried this today, applied my patch for BE<->LE conversions and
> > glibc-2.2 compatibility (attached, stil
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 07:01:34PM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> For future reference, git is unhappy if you actually do this, because your
> HEAD won't match the (empty) contents of the new directory. The easiest
> thing is to cp -r yo
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:40:31PM CEST, I got a letter
where Oliver Korpilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Hello!
Hello,
> I wondered if there is a project or setup that does allow me to build a
> GNU/Linux userland including kernel, build environment, basic tools with
> a
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:38:52AM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > > here goes
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:35:21AM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon
> > Linus' git, ai
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:25:04AM CEST, I got a letter
where David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if you work
> > in fully git env
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:47:05AM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:07:36PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > I'd suggest making it [index] big-endian to make sure the LE weenies don't
> > forget to byteswap properl
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 11:50:48AM CEST, I got a letter
where Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:39:40AM CEST, I got a letter
> where Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > On Tue, 12 Apr
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:13:15PM CEST, I got a letter
where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 15:02 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:47:25PM CEST, I got a letter
> > where Mar
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:47:25PM CEST, I got a letter
where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 15:57 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon
>
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:39:40AM CEST, I got a letter
where Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
..snip..
> > Basically, when you look at merge(1) :
> >
> > SYNOPSIS
> >me
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 06:05:19AM CEST, I got a letter
where David Eger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> So with git, *every* changeset is an entire (compressed) copy of the
> kernel. Really? Every patch you accept adds 37 MB to your hard disk?
>
> Am I missing something here?
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:20:18AM CEST, I got a letter
where "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> >Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:46:38PM CEST, I got a letter
> >where "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> >..snip..
> >> Graydon Hoare. (By
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:40:21AM CEST, I got a letter
where Pedro Larroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Hi
Hello,
> I had a quick look at the source of GIT tonight, I'd like to warn you
> about the use of hash functions as content indexers.
>
> As probably you are aware, has
Hello,
please do not trim the cc list so agressively.
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:46:38PM CEST, I got a letter
where "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
..snip..
> Graydon Hoare. (By the way, I would prefer that git just punt to
> user level programs for diff and
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 08:13:19PM CEST, I got a letter
where Chris Wedgwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 09:01:51AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > I disagree. Yes, the thing is designed to be replicated, so most of
> > the time the easiest thing to
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:49:31PM CEST, I got a letter
where "Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:38:00 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote:
..snip..
> | Yes. Crappy old tree, but it can still read my git.git directory, so you
> | can use it to upda
Hello,
here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon
Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.
If you already have a previous git-pasky version, just git pull pasky
to get it (but see below!!!). Otherwise, you can get it from:
http://pask
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:40:00AM CEST, I got a letter
where Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> * Ingo Molnar:
>
> > is there any fundamental problem with going with v2 right now, and then
> > once v3 is out and assuming it looks ok, all newly copyrightable bits
>
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:50:51AM CEST, I got a letter
where Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
>
> * Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon Li
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 04:46:42AM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon
> >
Hello,
here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon
Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.
If you already have a previous git-pasky version, just git pull pasky
to get it. Otherwise, you can get it from:
http://pasky.or.cz/~pasky/dev/
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:38:11PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
..snip..
> Can you pull my current repo, which has "diff-tree -R" that does what the
> name suggests, and which should be faster than the 0.48 sec you see..
Am I just missi
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 02:20:52AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Btw, does anybody have strong opinions on the license? I didn't put in a
> COPYING file exactly because I was torn between GPLv2 and OSL2.1.
>
> I'm inclined to go with G
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:14:57AM CEST, I got a letter
where Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Useful explanation - thanks, Linus.
>
> Is this picture and description accurate:
>
> ==
>
>
> <
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:46:50AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> >
> > (BTW, it would be useful to have a tool which just blindly takes what
> > you giv
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:39:02PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Can you pull my current repo, which has "diff-tree -R" that does what the
> > name suggests, and which should be faster
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:10:58AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> >
> > I currently already do a merge when you track someone's source - it will
> >
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 08:42:53PM CEST, I got a letter
where Christopher Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> I totally agree that odds is really really small.
> That is why it is not worthy to handle the case. People hit that
> can just add a new line or some thing to avoid it, if
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:38:11PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> >
> > It turns out to be the forks for doing all the cuts and such what is
> > bogging it down so awf
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 12:07:37AM CEST, I got a letter
where "Luck, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
..snip..
> >Hey, I may end up being wrong, and yes, maybe I should have done a
> >two-level one. The good news is that we can trivially fix it later (even
> >dynamically - we
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 09:13:19PM CEST, I got a letter
where Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 08:45:22PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
> > It turns out to be the forks for doing all the cuts and such what is
> > bo
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 07:45:12PM CEST, I got a letter
where Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
>
> * Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > I will also need to do more testing on the linux kernel tree.
> > > > Committing patch-2.6.7 on 2.6.6 kernel and the
Hello,
so I "released" git-pasky-0.1, my set of patches and scripts upon
Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.
You can get it at
http://pasky.or.cz/~pasky/dev/git/git-pasky-base.tar.bz2
and after unpacking and building (make) do
git pull
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:28:54AM CEST, I got a letter
where Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > "CL" == Christopher Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> CL> On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 12:51:59AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >>
> >> But I am wondering what your pl
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 07:53:40AM CEST, I got a letter
where Christopher Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 12:51:59AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> > But I am wondering what your plans are to handle renames---or
> > does git already represent them?
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 01:31:10AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Actually, I guess I wouldn't have to change the format. I could just
> > extend the existing "tree" object to be able to
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 03:01:12AM CEST, I got a letter
where Phillip Lougher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Apr 9, 2005 3:53 AM, Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > FWIW, I made few small fixes (to prevent some trivial usage errors to
&g
Hello,
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 09:45:52PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> The good news is, the data structures/indexes haven't changed, but many of
> the tools to interface with them have new (and improved!) semantics:
>
> In particula
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 09:08:59AM CEST, I got a letter
where "Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sat, 9 Apr 2005 04:53:57 +0200 Petr Baudis wrote:
..snip..
> | FWIW, I made few small fixes (to prevent some trivial usage errors to
> | ca
hen I
will probably do some dwimmy gitdiff.sh wrapper for tree-diff and
show-diff. At that point I might get my hand on some pull more kind to
local changes.
Kind regards,
Petr Baudis
diff -ruN git-0.03/gitadd.sh git-devel-clean/gitadd.sh
--- git-0.03/gitadd.sh
> Why not have the /proc/config option but instead of being plain text,
> make it binary with a userspace app that can interpret it?
[snip]
> You'd have
> 2.4.3-pre3:110101 . . . . .
>
I think this is against UNIX/Linux philosophy... Why we wouldn't just
providing all the interfa
> > [1.] Upon boot, the 2.4.1 kernel misconfigures one of two 3c509b NICs
> > installed in my computer as "BNC" rather than "10baseT".
>
> > Boot messages for eth0 in kernel 2.2:
> > eth0: 3c509 at 0x300 tag 1, 10baseT port, address 00 a0 24 e9 8d a1, IRQ 10.
> > and in 2.4:
> > eth0: 3c509
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 09:00:26AM -0500, you [James Lewis Nance] claimed:
> >
> > ( mrproper == Mr. Proper )
> >
> > I saw a post from Linus once about this. It is Finnish for "Mr. Clean".
>
> Just to be sure: 'proper' does not mean anything in Finnish (nor Swedish
> for that matter AFAIK) i
66 matches
Mail list logo
