On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:58 PM Serge Semin wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:45:37PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:42:01PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:22:56PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:13:38PM -0
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:45:37PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:42:01PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:22:56PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:13:38PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 06:33:5
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:42:01PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:22:56PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:13:38PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 06:33:51PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
>
> > > you're sending
> > > new vers
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:22:56PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:13:38PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 06:33:51PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > you're sending
> > new versions too fast. Give people time to review.
>
> Yeah, you did. Sorry for send
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:13:38PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 06:33:51PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > Rob,
> > Could you pay attention to this patch? The patchset review procedure is
> > nearly over, while the DT part is only partly reviewed by you.
>
> Pretty sure I com
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 06:33:51PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> Rob,
> Could you pay attention to this patch? The patchset review procedure is
> nearly over, while the DT part is only partly reviewed by you.
Pretty sure I commented on this. Not sure what version, you're sending
new versions too fa
Rob,
Could you pay attention to this patch? The patchset review procedure is
nearly over, while the DT part is only partly reviewed by you.
Thanks
-Sergey
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 06:30:37PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> dtc currently doesn't support I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS flag set in the
> i2c "reg"
dtc currently doesn't support I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS flag set in the
i2c "reg" property. If it is the compiler will print a warning:
Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /example-2/i2c@112/eeprom@64: I2C bus unit address
format error, expected "4064"
Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /example-2/i2c@112/eeprom@
8 matches
Mail list logo