are acceleration across the entire runtime?
David
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Connors
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 1:44 AM
To: listserver@ozsilverlight.com<mailto:listserver@ozsilverlight.com>
Subject: Re: [OzSilverl
m:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *David Connors
*Sent:* Thursday, October 30, 2008 1:44 AM
*To:* listserver@ozsilverlight.com
*Subject:* Re: [OzSilverlight] RE: Hardware accelerated video?
Scott,
You probably think I'm yanking your chain and I know this is an SL
, 2008 1:44 AM
To: listserver@ozsilverlight.com
Subject: Re: [OzSilverlight] RE: Hardware accelerated video?
Scott,
You probably think I'm yanking your chain and I know this is an SL list but
seriously "I wouldn't be discouraged by Flash 10's new toys as in the
end..Flash is s
PROTECTED] | C:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | W: www.readify.net
>
>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Scott Barnes
> Sent: Thursday, 30 October 2008 15:14
> To: listserver@ozSilverlight.com
> Subject: [OzSilverlight] RE: Hardware accelerated vi
www.readify.net
>
>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Scott Barnes
> Sent: Thursday, 30 October 2008 15:14
> To: listserver@ozSilverlight.com
> Subject: [OzSilverlight] RE: Hardware accelerated video?
>
>
>
> Nope J
>
>
>
Subject: [OzSilverlight] RE: Hardware accelerated video?
That wasn’t so smooth for me the other day, audio was stuttering, etc. I’m
onsite mind you so connection may not be great, but I’m downloading PDC videos
at 150 KB/sec so seems fairly decent (1.2 Mbps).
Regards,
Damian Edwards
Microsoft
hursday, 30 October 2008 15:14
To: listserver@ozSilverlight.com
Subject: [OzSilverlight] RE: Hardware accelerated video?
Nope :)
In terms of what Flash has, they 10 added hardware bitmap compositing. Verdict
is still out on how good it is in reality. Given our latest success with Smooth
://delicategeniusblog.com<http://delicategeniusblog.com/>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorke Odolphi
Sent: Thursday, 30 October 2008 2:56 AM
To: listserver@ozSilverlight.com
Subject: [OzSilverlight] RE: Hardware accelerated video?
I mean - MediaStreamSource
I mean - MediaStreamSource .. gah..
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorke Odolphi
Sent: Thursday, 30 October 2008 7:51 PM
To: listserver@ozSilverlight.com
Subject: [OzSilverlight] RE: Hardware accelerated video?
Smooth streaming at this stage is done by reencoding
: Thursday, 30 October 2008 4:12 PM
To: listserver@ozSilverlight.com
Subject: [OzSilverlight] RE: Hardware accelerated video?
Magic of software my friend.. Magic..of..software :)
I'm poking our video experts for breakdown of the how now as I'm sure it's got
a nice story to be
Scott,
You probably think I'm yanking your chain and I know this is an SL list but
seriously "I wouldn't be discouraged by Flash 10's new toys as in the
end..Flash is still Flash :D" isn't really a good way to advocate a
platform. Props where props are due - Flash 10 does look pretty good.
Other
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philip Beadle
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 11:09 PM
To: listserver@ozSilverlight.com
Subject: [OzSilverlight] RE: Hardware accelerated video?
Wow that smooth HD is really smooth. How was that done?
Regards,
Philip Beadle
Readify | Principal Consultant
Mi
t; | C: [EMAIL
PROTECTED] | W: www.readify.net<http://www.readify.net/>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Barnes
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:14 PM
To: listserver@ozSilverlight.com
Subject: [OzSilverlight] RE: Hardware accelerated video?
Nope :)
In t
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Connors
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 10:13 PM
To: listserver@ozSilverlight.com
Subject: Re: [OzSilverlight] RE: Hardware accelerated video?
Scott Barnes wrote:
The implementation more so. It’s also not just about the runtime
Scott Barnes wrote:
The
implementation more so. It’s also not just about the
runtime, at the end of the day TCO is quite strong driving factor in
this
ethos, so having the technical prowess is one thing, holding it hostage
to
price..now that’s where technology decisions make or
David Connors
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 9:33 PM
To: listserver@ozsilverlight.com
Subject: Re: [OzSilverlight] RE: Hardware accelerated video?
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Scott Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>> wrote:
In terms of what Flash has, they 10 ad
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Scott Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> In terms of what Flash has, they 10 added hardware bitmap compositing.
> Verdict is still out on how good it is in reality.
>
Do you mean the verdict is still out on how good their implementation is or
whether or not it is
Nope :)
In terms of what Flash has, they 10 added hardware bitmap compositing. Verdict
is still out on how good it is in reality. Given our latest success with Smooth
Streaming in IIS7, I wouldn't be discouraged by Flash 10's new toys as in the
end..Flash is still Flash :D
http://www.smoothHD.
18 matches
Mail list logo
