Re: Pushing a wgo section

2006-09-30 Thread Quim Gil
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 02:53 +0200, Martin Jeppesen wrote: > Are there anyone that have reached the October 18th milestone, so I > can get a feeling how it is supposed to be done? I have created a template to be used as a reference in the GnomeWeb goals. Adapt it to your needs: http://live.gnome.or

GnomeWeb 2.18 goals

2006-09-30 Thread Quim Gil
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/Goals updated. All the 2.18 goals that we need to push for the wgo revamp are there. Add more goals if you want to join us in the GnomeWeb release cycle. See http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/DevelopmentTimeline to know what this implies. The end of new goals proposal

Re: [Fwd: XHTML 1.1 or 1.0?]

2006-09-30 Thread Joachim Noreiko
--- Quim Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is stated in that document that all pages should > conform to XHTML 1.1. I think this is a bad idea > unless you want to keep out Internet Explorer users > since XHTML 1.1 requires the web server to send the > MIME type application/xhtml+xml instead o

[Fwd: XHTML 1.1 or 1.0?]

2006-09-30 Thread Quim Gil
I sent this initially to gnome.web-list since the topic is quite technical. However, since most of the GnomeWeb newcomers are here perhaps someone has got a good an opinion/answer... --- Begin Message --- http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/WebPolicies sets XHTML 1.1 as a wgo policy. In the comments th