On Sat, 13 Jul 2013, Craig R. Skinner wrote:
Lady Di,
Ahh, that is so cute.
glad you clarified your original short reply.
g.day
diana
Past hissy-fits are not a predictor of future hissy-fits.
Nick Holland(06 Dec 2005)
Appreciate the clarification. Now someone searching
past posts will have a better idea of what happened.
g.day
diana
Past hissy-fits are not a predictor of future hissy-fits.
Nick Holland(06 Dec 2005)
On 2013-07-12 Fri 17:39 PM |, Diana Eichert wrote:
>
> What you are asking only makes sense, unfortunately
> Craig appears to be like a lot of malling list
> subscribers. They are "takers" not "givers".
>
Lady Di,
It's gracious to be respectful of other's timezone's & life schedules.
Cheers,
On 2013-07-12 Fri 23:12 PM |, Thomas Reiter wrote:
>
> would you mind to share how you have solved the problem?
> otherwise someone has to ask the same question some day.
>
Of course Thomas, but as each piece of hardware is different, I doubt
what worked in this case will be transferable.
I
Sure, Nick did explain his solution, which was the
same one I would have done since I've been doing this
since 300 baud was the norm.
But is this what Craig did? Who knows?
diana
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, patrick keshishian wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Diana Eichert wrote:
Thomas
W
On 07/12/13 20:05, patrick keshishian wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Diana Eichert wrote:
>> Thomas
>>
>> What you are asking only makes sense, unfortunately
>> Craig appears to be like a lot of malling list
>> subscribers. They are "takers" not "givers".
>
> Nick already explained an
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Diana Eichert wrote:
> Thomas
>
> What you are asking only makes sense, unfortunately
> Craig appears to be like a lot of malling list
> subscribers. They are "takers" not "givers".
Nick already explained and outlined all the necessary steps. Did he not?
--patri
Thomas
What you are asking only makes sense, unfortunately
Craig appears to be like a lot of malling list
subscribers. They are "takers" not "givers".
g.day
diana
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Thomas Reiter wrote:
On 07/12/2013 10:38 PM, Craig R. Skinner wrote:
On 2013-07-12 Fri 10:42 AM |, Nick Ho
On 07/12/2013 10:38 PM, Craig R. Skinner wrote:
> On 2013-07-12 Fri 10:42 AM |, Nick Holland wrote:
>>
>> but I'll tell you how to figure it out.
>>
>> [ wise words of practical relevance ]
>>
>
> Solved!
>
> Thanks,
>
would you mind to share how you have solved the problem?
otherwise someone h
On 2013-07-12 Fri 10:42 AM |, Nick Holland wrote:
>
> but I'll tell you how to figure it out.
>
> [ wise words of practical relevance ]
>
Solved!
Thanks,
--
Craig Skinner | http://twitter.com/Craig_Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7
On 07/12/2013 09:45 AM, Craig R. Skinner wrote:
I've a box that won't self start after a power failure.
The BIOS docs shows:
Remote Ring On
This allows you to wake up the system from a serial port modem.
How could this be done from another OpenBSD box connected via a serial
cross over cable + c
I've a box that won't self start after a power failure.
The BIOS docs shows:
Remote Ring On
This allows you to wake up the system from a serial port modem.
How could this be done from another OpenBSD box connected via a serial
cross over cable + cu/tip/etc?
The serial link is operational & I get
12 matches
Mail list logo