Re: [Mjpeg-users] Mplex and lpcm problems

2005-08-05 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Skip Intro wrote: > What's the story on AC-3? Have you ever ran AC-3 audio-only DVD disk > through a compatibility lab to see what the "coverage" is? The last time (a while back I admit) I tried to use ffmpeg's AC3 audio and it didn't play the fellow (not a co

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Mplex and lpcm problems

2005-08-05 Thread Skip Intro
> AC3 would be the way to go for maximum compatibility (and take up > a LOT less space than PCM). I use DVDSP's AC3 encoder because I > was never able to get DVDSP (or my settop box) to accept ffmpeg's AC3 > output. When testing disks we're producing at a commercial compatiblilty company, the onl

Re: [Mjpeg-users] RE: Mjpegtools 1.6.3 on an i386 (fwd)

2005-08-05 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Sat, 6 Aug 2005, Gernot Ziegler wrote: > since C routines always are the common denominator for porting to new > platforms, I doubt that any of the developers will abandon these fallback > routines altogether. That leads me to the statement that any > compilation problems with the C only code

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Mplex and lpcm problems

2005-08-05 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Skip Intro wrote: > I've never been able to get mplex to work with pcm audio! Hmmm, it's been working OK for a while for other folks. > trying this with 1.6.3, but previous versions are doing the same > thing. Ahhh, is that the "release candidate 1" kit that

[Mjpeg-users] Mplex and lpcm problems

2005-08-05 Thread Skip Intro
Folks: I've never been able to get mplex to work with pcm audio! My source PCM sounds fine and my video looks fine pre-multiplex. When I multiplex them together. If I load the audio into Adobe audition, telling it it's 48000, 16 bits, Motorola byte order, it sounds fine. Then if I multiplex it

[Mjpeg-users] RE: Mjpegtools 1.6.3 on an i386 (fwd)

2005-08-05 Thread Gernot Ziegler
Hej, since C routines always are the common denominator for porting to new platforms, I doubt that any of the developers will abandon these fallback routines altogether. That leads me to the statement that any compilation problems with the C only code must be a bug and was not intended :-) > > N

Re: Re: Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdenoise

2005-08-05 Thread Odile Planquelle
Hello, I get the main.c ( 1.42 ) and the makefile.am ( 1.24 ) of /yuvdenoise and compile another time. Now everything is fine. Thanks for help > De: "Odile Planquelle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > A: "Bernhard Praschinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Objet: Re: Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdenoise > Date:

[Mjpeg-users] newbie trying to use a dc10 plus card

2005-08-05 Thread David Stan
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 03:39, David Stan wrote: my 1st question is how do i know what modules or drivers are loaded? which do i need? /sbin/lsmod tells you what drivers are loaded, /sbin/lsmod | grep zr36067 is what you're looking for. If it gives no output, don't worry, just load the driver: /s