Stuart Frew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The user is using the system to process client A. The cookie contains
> stateful information including the client ID.
>
> They then open an new browser window, and lookup client B, recieving a
> new session ID with new state information, including the cl
Gunther Birznieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, I think it is reasonable to make the interface to support a
> data source for the widgets flexible and object based to make it easy
> for someone to write a DBI source, a DBM source, an LDAP source, an
> Apache::Session source or whatever a
Paul Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 09:59:36AM -0400, Chip Turner wrote:
> > darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > The nice thing about closures is they could hide any interface at all
> > behind them; all that is required is that the function that
Gunther Birznieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While I think that it is clever to allow an interface to change where
> the parameters come from, I think in practice there are different
> things to expect. eg how to deal with multi-values? How to deal with
> file upload field? I think there are q
Jay,
I think that pretty much describes what I have in mind ...
plus a few other features.
Hopefully within a week or two (based on demands of other *paying* jobs),
I will have a working distribution with most of the bare-bones plumbing in
place and a little configurable date widget implement
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Doug MacEachern) wrote:
>On Wed, 23 May 2001, Adam Prime wrote:
>> I was looking through the mod_perl archives and saw a post from doug about a
>> credit card processing system called 'creditor' i looked on the covalent
>> web site, but i couldn't find any info. Did this thing
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Adam Prime wrote:
>
> I was looking through the mod_perl archives and saw a post from doug about a
> credit card processing system called 'creditor' i looked on the covalent
> web site, but i couldn't find any info. Did this thing ever see the light
> of day?
yes, creda
* Tom Gioconda ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010524 23:03]:
> It was my impression that PerlEx handled the persistance and what not, but
> it wouldn't allow one to make a content handler using perl. I need some way
> of processing every html file through my TemplateHandler::handler method.
> The way I
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Chethan Pandarinath wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been trying to compile apache with mod_perl and mod_php support.
> I've been following the instructions from the "mod_perl Guide"
> [http://perl.apache.org/guide/install.html#mod_perl_and_mod_php] (and
> just assuming that it's si
Hi all,
I've been trying to compile apache with mod_perl and mod_php support.
I've been following the instructions from the "mod_perl Guide"
[http://perl.apache.org/guide/install.html#mod_perl_and_mod_php] (and
just assuming that it's similar for php3 and php4).
I haven't been able to get mod_pe
It was my impression that PerlEx handled the persistance and what not, but
it wouldn't allow one to make a content handler using perl. I need some way
of processing every html file through my TemplateHandler::handler method.
The way I was doing this was telling Apache to use my method as the
On 24 May 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm having a recurring problem that I can't find comment about in the docs, and
> I was wondering if anyone might have some insight on this.
>
> I have a web site where *everything* is mod_perl handlers. The problem that I'm
> seeing is that I will go to
At 10:22 AM 5/24/2001 -0700, Paul Lindner wrote:
>On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 09:59:36AM -0400, Chip Turner wrote:
> > darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > The nice thing about closures is they could hide any interface at all
> > behind them; all that is required is that the function
so who's doing the perl wrappers?
-- Forwarded message --
Date: 22 May 2001 23:48:06 -0400
From: Alex Graveley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ANNOUNCE: Soup (0.2)
Ximian is happy to announce the first release of Soup, a Simple Object Access
Opps forgot to CC the list
--
Cheers Stuart
---
New Zealand Revolution
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+64 9 918 7663
On 24 May 2001 14:57:09 -0700, ___cliff rayman___ wrote:
>
>
> Stuart Frew wrote:
>
> > On 24 May 2001 14:21:32 -0700, ___cliff
* Tom Gioconda ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010524 20:06]:
> My company, to my objections, recently decided to force all of our new
> servers to running only Win2k. I won't go into the details, but let's just
> say that in our standard hosting facilities, nothing runing Linux is allowed
> anymore. Th
My company, to my objections, recently decided to force all of our new
servers to running only Win2k. I won't go into the details, but let's just
say that in our standard hosting facilities, nothing runing Linux is allowed
anymore. This kinds of screws my department, as we have just finished
Morning,
this has come up a few times before, but I haven`t found the exact answer
yet.
I want to test if enabling keep-alive makes some pages load faster. I know
the disadvanteges (could use massive amounts memory), but hey, it might
just work.
I`m using the wellknown browser<->mod_rewrite/pro
i'd still use a cookie to indentify the user. why not include
the client id as part of the submission from the browser. it
is easy to keep detailed data in the cookie separate for each client
$sessionData{$clientKey}{$clientDataStuff}=$in{DATAKEY}
Stuart Frew wrote:
> > This is an even more pr
I'm having a recurring problem that I can't find comment about in the docs, and
I was wondering if anyone might have some insight on this.
I have a web site where *everything* is mod_perl handlers. The problem that I'm
seeing is that I will go to the url http://hostname/foo and I get the content
At 08:39 25.05.2001 +1200, you wrote:
>And there lies the rub.
>
>The user is using the system to process client A. The cookie contains
>stateful information including the client ID.
>
>They then open an new browser window, and lookup client B, recieving a
>new session ID with new state informati
> This is an even more pronounced problem with sessions IDs in
> URLs, though. With cookie based session tracking, the second
> browser window will send the same cookie that the first browser
> window received.
>
And there lies the rub.
The user is using the system to process client A. The co
[[ This is a resend.. did some cutting and pasting of code into telnet
windows that messed it up through shell expansion. My bad. ]]
I have a couple modules that might be the start of what you are calling a
Widget system. I'm not sure if my modules are in line with the thoughts
expressed on this
I have a couple modules that might be the start of what you are calling a
Widget system. I'm not sure if my modules are in line with the thoughts
expressed on this list. Pardon me if this is something different: I've been
loosely following this discussion..
Using my library, whenever I want a fo
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 09:59:36AM -0400, Chip Turner wrote:
> darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> The nice thing about closures is they could hide any interface at all
> behind them; all that is required is that the function that generates
> the closure follow the very simple conv
Related to the previous discussion of closures vs object interface (eg
param) for getting CGI form data into the widgets:
While I think that it is clever to allow an interface to change where the
parameters come from, I think in practice there are different things to
expect. eg how to deal wit
At 08:50 PM 5/23/01 -0400, Adi Fairbank wrote:
>Stephen,
>
>I read your proposal and I like it a lot. I will help filling out the
>HTML::Widget::HTML* space (in your package structure suggestion).
>
>However, I like Gunther's suggestion for a namespace of Widget:: better than
>HTML::Widget::, bec
Hey all,
Let me describe what I have been imagining as the ideal widget for what I am
writing:
1 - it can look to its environment to determine how to render itsself
- am I on an HTML page or something else?
2 - it has properties that can be set and remain static no matter who's
u
Yeah, create a safe link jumping point. Something that you'd link to
instead of the external link, and pass in the external link, without a
session_id so that the HTTP_REFERER won't have the session ID.
Don't rely on IP address for more reasons then you mentioned...
It might not hurt to impleme
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> A better way for session ids is to put them in front of the URI:
> http://www.nus.edu.sg/dfd3453/some/path/and/file.html
(...)
> These session ids are sticky as long as you only use relative paths in your
> html. Note: You may want to put your images in a directory tha
darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Chip Turner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect on 05/23/2001:
> > If I could make a suggestion -- don't depend upon a CGI.pm interface
> > for form variables. Abstract it away. One option would be to use
> > closures:
>
> I agree
Stuart Frew ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect on 05/23/2001:
> Greetings,
>
> One problem with using cookies for session management is that the user
> can have two browsers open doing the same process.
>
> Which means the first cookie Session ID will be over writen by the
> secon
Chip Turner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect on 05/23/2001:
> If I could make a suggestion -- don't depend upon a CGI.pm interface
> for form variables. Abstract it away. One option would be to use
> closures:
I agree with not relying upon CGI, but using closures still
requires
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 08:20:01AM +1200, Stuart Frew wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> One problem with using cookies for session management is that the user
> can have two browsers open doing the same process.
>
> Which means the first cookie Session ID will be over writen by the
> second one. Which can
> I will step up to write this code. (if it is what I think it is)
> I have responded to the message by beginning a requirements document.
>
>http://www.officevision.com/pub/HTML-Widget/
>
> Please read it and send me any comments.
> The following are the questions I need advice on in order to
35 matches
Mail list logo