Re: problems building apache + mod_perl + mod_ssl on FreeBSD 4.3

2001-08-12 Thread Stas Bekman
On 12 Aug 2001, Wayne Pascoe wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I am trying to build mod_perl-1.26 for Apache 1.3.20 with mod_ssl > > > 2.8.4 on FreeBSD. The version of perl that I have installed on this > > > machine is 5.6.1 > > > > > > If I build just mod_perl and Apache, the build goes fine. Th

Re: perl 5.6.1 compiling problem.

2001-08-12 Thread Stas Bekman
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, erb wrote: > While trying to compile 5.6.1 w/ dynamic support for mod_perl, I ran into > this problem.. looks like you've sent this email to the wrong address. This is mod_perl list, not perl one. See http://lists.perl.org/ to find Perl related lists. when you post to the r

Re: modperl 2.0

2001-08-12 Thread Stas Bekman
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Barrie Slaymaker wrote: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 08:39:09AM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > > > I will try, but this indicates to me that perl 5.6 is geared towards > > Linux without consideration for BSD/OS and related OSes. > > Huh? I don't follow. Neither would Tom Baker ;-)

Re: knowledge base

2001-08-12 Thread Jim Smith
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 02:44:27PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > On Sat, 11 Aug 2001, Jim Smith wrote: > > I am thinking about splitting this into two projects: backend repository > > modules and frontend web interface. My strength is on the backend stuff. > > > > This allows for multiple fronten

Re: modperl 2.0

2001-08-12 Thread The Doctor
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 07:18:11PM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:55:26PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > When I ran perl 5.6.1 it was identifying itself as perl 5.6.0 . > > > > Identity crisis?? > > Dunno, but you can bet it's not right. Care to post the command and >

[ANNOUNCE] HTTP::WebTest 1.06

2001-08-12 Thread Ilya Martynov
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to comp.lang.perl.announce,comp.lang.perl.modules as well. The URL http://martynov.org/tgz/HTTP-WebTest-1.06.tar.gz has entered CPAN as file: $CPAN/authors/id/I/IL/ILYAM/HTTP-WebTest-1.06.tar.gz size: 60811 by

problems building apache + mod_perl + mod_ssl on FreeBSD 4.3

2001-08-12 Thread Wayne Pascoe
Sorry if this appears twice. My mailserver says that it was accepted, but it has not shown up on the list yet... Hi all, I am trying to build mod_perl-1.26 for Apache 1.3.20 with mod_ssl 2.8.4 on FreeBSD. The version of perl that I have installed on this machine is 5.6.1 If I build just mod_per

problems building apache + mod_perl + mod_ssl on FreeBSD 4.3

2001-08-12 Thread Wayne Pascoe
Hi all, I am trying to build mod_perl-1.26 for Apache 1.3.20 with mod_ssl 2.8.4 on FreeBSD. The version of perl that I have installed on this machine is 5.6.1 If I build just mod_perl and Apache, the build goes fine. The problem only exists if I add mod_ssl to the mix. To configure Apache, I ha

[ANNOUNCE] HTTP::WebTest 1.05

2001-08-12 Thread Ilya Martynov
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to comp.lang.perl.announce as well. The uploaded file HTTP-WebTest-1.05.tar.gz has entered CPAN as file: $CPAN/authors/id/I/IL/ILYAM/HTTP-WebTest-1.05.tar.gz size: 60698 bytes md5: 8c9b0742f34310f41e35cca8f

Re: modperl 2.0

2001-08-12 Thread Barrie Slaymaker
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:55:26PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > When I ran perl 5.6.1 it was identifying itself as perl 5.6.0 . > > Identity crisis?? Dunno, but you can bet it's not right. Care to post the command and results? Sounds like a symlink problem, you might want to use some combination

Re: modperl 2.0

2001-08-12 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, The Doctor wrote: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 05:51:22PM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:47:09PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > > > > > perl 5.6.1 calling itself perl 5.6.0 > > > > > > Come off of it! > > > > I don't know where you got that

Re: modperl 2.0

2001-08-12 Thread The Doctor
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 05:50:01PM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:46:24PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > > > This is not going well with me as this forces to stay at perl 5.00503 until > > BSD/OS comes up with the new perl distrubution. > > Again, I don't follow. What

Re: modperl 2.0

2001-08-12 Thread The Doctor
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 05:51:22PM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:47:09PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > > > perl 5.6.1 calling itself perl 5.6.0 > > > > Come off of it! > > I don't know where you got that idea. When I ran perl 5.6.1 it was identifying its

Re: modperl 2.0

2001-08-12 Thread Barrie Slaymaker
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:47:09PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > perl 5.6.1 calling itself perl 5.6.0 > > Come off of it! I don't know where you got that idea.

Re: modperl 2.0

2001-08-12 Thread Barrie Slaymaker
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:46:24PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > This is not going well with me as this forces to stay at perl 5.00503 until > BSD/OS comes up with the new perl distrubution. Again, I don't follow. What leads you to that conclusion? - Barrie

Re: modperl 2.0

2001-08-12 Thread The Doctor
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:49:30PM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 08:39:09AM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > > > I will try, but this indicates to me that perl 5.6 is geared towards > > Linux without consideration for BSD/OS and related OSes. > > Huh? I don't follow. Neit

Re: modperl 2.0

2001-08-12 Thread The Doctor
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:49:30PM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 08:39:09AM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > > > I will try, but this indicates to me that perl 5.6 is geared towards > > Linux without consideration for BSD/OS and related OSes. > > Huh? I don't follow. Neit