Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

2001-03-21 Thread Piers Cawley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz) writes: > > "Geoffrey" == Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> > still need more suggestions for a theme that aren't > >> > tongue-in-cheek, > >> > >> lol! Why, I thought that was the idea!!! > > Geoffrey> well, of course - but much folly

Re: Passing data among handlers

2001-01-30 Thread Piers Cawley
Robert Landrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've never tried this, but you could store things into main using > one handler and retrieve them with another, provided that you > cleaned up afterward. If, for any reason you failed to cleanup, the > server would leak memory... not that it doesn't al

Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path...

2001-01-30 Thread Piers Cawley
Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Robin Berjon wrote: > > > At 13:54 30/01/2001 +, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > >On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> Seriously - it should be possible to create a XSLT stylesheet that > > will > > >>out

Re: why is it so gay?

2000-12-18 Thread Piers Cawley
What does the happiness or otherwise of mod_perl have to do with anything? And if you're referring to its sexuality then I'm even more confused. It's a *thing*, it isn't sexually attracted to anything. -- Piers

Re: RFC: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection (and a proposal!)

2000-12-07 Thread Piers Cawley
Robin Berjon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 14:07 06/12/2000 -0500, kyle dawkins wrote: > >Ok, you're missing my point but that's partially my fault for not explaining. > > First, let me agree: Java's "everything is an object" mentality sucks > >balls. And yes, Perl's duality of functional/

Re: Putting together the TPC mod_perl track

2000-11-12 Thread Piers Cawley
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BTW, if you have something to talk about that isn't really useful, but > very funny, you should propose it as well. Dave Cross' talk about > Sub::Approx at YAPC::Europe was the killer talk. Remember that learning > new things is nice, but having a few minu

Re: Lifetime session with Apache::Session module version 1.51

2000-08-10 Thread Piers Cawley
"Jeffrey W. Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Eddy Vernay wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have a problem with the Apache::Session module. > > > > Before, I was using the version 0.15 of this module. In this version, we can > > use the SESSION_LIFETIME variable to define how

Re: Apache::Config module

2000-06-28 Thread Piers Cawley
> > Perhaps > > > > 3. multi-level hash, i.e. > >$conf->{directory}->{'/'}->{sethandler} > > > > This is, afaik, more in-line with what the ... sections do. I > > would suggest making it so the output of this module could easily be fed into > > the mod_perl configuration engine