> From: Paul Lindner, on Tuesday, May 01, 2001 3:04 AM:
>
> On a related note, does anyone anywhere still use
> Experimental::Exception?
>
The COPE CORBA module uses Experimental::Exception for it's exception
handling. There is an effort underway to change to Error.pm (or something
else a bit
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> I've tried that, but last time I went with more general
> classes of exceptions containing unique error IDs
> (defined in a constants module) to indicate the exact
> type. Not as Java-like, but it did save me from
> creating dozens of classes with no
on 4/30/01 8:47 PM, brian moseley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
>
>> type of exception. Right now I cannot in fact think of
>> any program I have written that branches on the type of
>> exception. Java encourages this with multiple catch
>
> in CP
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 05:47:03PM -0700, brian moseley wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
>
> > type of exception. Right now I cannot in fact think of
> > any program I have written that branches on the type of
> > exception. Java encourages this with multiple catch
>
> in
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> type of exception. Right now I cannot in fact think of
> any program I have written that branches on the type of
> exception. Java encourages this with multiple catch
in CP Web Mail, the underlying libraries throw typed
exceptions so that the appl
At 03:24 PM 4/30/01 -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
>On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> >
> > > Yes precisely. It used to be that you could only die() with a
> string, but
> > > 5. gave us die() with a reference to an object and at tha
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> I have learned that errors from down in the call stack are very rarely
> conditionally recoverable. If I call obj->method(), and it throws an
> exception, there are few situations where the cause of the exception
> matters at all. In most cases I w
Title: RE: Exception modules
unsubscribe please- thanks
-Original Message-
From: Matt Sergeant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 4:29 PM
To: Jeffrey W. Baker
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Exception modules
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
>
> > Yes precisely. It used to be that you could only die() with a string, but
> > 5. gave us die() with a reference to an object and at that moment
> > the system was complete. The creation of a rationa
Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It doesn't seem any different from Error.pm to me, except in syntax.
> Maybe you could expand on why/where it is different?
OK, yes, it *is* very similar in principle - I would perhaps have been
better to have added to Graham's code, but I suffer from
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> Yes precisely. It used to be that you could only die() with a string, but
> 5. gave us die() with a reference to an object and at that moment
> the system was complete. The creation of a rational exception object type
> is left to the discretion of
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > [1] for my Perl exception package (yes, another one :) which, in its
> > > > development version, now mostly does the Right Thing fo
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> >
> > > [1] for my Perl exception package (yes, another one :) which, in its
> > > development version, now mostly does the Right Thing for mod_perl. See
> > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/perle
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> > [1] for my Perl exception package (yes, another one :) which, in its
> > development version, now mostly does the Right Thing for mod_perl. See
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/perlexception/ for the curious.
>
> Since I'm doing the mod_perl ex
> [1] for my Perl exception package (yes, another one :) which, in its
> development version, now mostly does the Right Thing for mod_perl. See
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/perlexception/ for the curious.
Since I'm doing the mod_perl exception handling talk at TPC, I feel
obligated to ask
15 matches
Mail list logo
