On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Brendan Lloyd wrote:
> And last but not least: can anyone clarify what the state of Apache
> 2.0 is with regards to OpenSSL/mod_ssl? I've read in some places that
> Apache 2.0 supports/includes these, but then when I went to download
> the Windows binary distribution it had t
well, the LD_LIBRARY_PATH should point to all the shared libs that
you'll need. Probably
/usr/lib:/lib:/usr/local/lib:/usr/local/ssl/lib
is a good start
-g
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 12:07:15PM -0700, David Loesche wrote:
> I did read the referred document concerning the build phase. I am intri
Guillaume wrote:
> Yes you can, but you'll need to buy MS Visual C++ to compile Apache.
> Instructions are available at:
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/windows.html
> http://www.modssl.org/source/exp/mod_ssl/pkg.mod_ssl/INSTALL.Win32
I note that the modssl install instructions are out of date (as
I did read the referred document concerning the build phase. I am intrigued
by the LD_LIBRARY_PATH suggestion. What would you recommend I set it to?
-Original Message-
From: Boyle Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: I a
At 14:23 -0400 14/07/02, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
>I wrote:
>> Now, I am learning how to build the server and extra modules from
>>source, so that I: 1) learn how to do it, 2) have the latest
>>releases to draw upon, instead of Red Hat's lagged-behind software,
>>with back-ported patches, 3) k
At 16:42 +1000 15/07/02, Brendan Lloyd wrote:
>I am a new member to this group. I have a question which was asked on
>2002-06-07 by Ike Ikonne (for which I could not locate any answer in
>the list archives) so please forgive me for the repetition...
>
>My situation is like Ike's: I too need to ins
Hi all,
I wrote:
> I am a new member to this group. I have a question which was asked on
> 2002-06-07 by Ike Ikonne (for which I could not locate any answer in
> the list archives) so please forgive me for the repetition...
>
> My situation is like Ike's: I too need to install mod_ssl and Open_
Strange behavior: The error I recently reported on compiling under WIN2000
with MSVC++ diappeared on re-trying the same compile. First time through an
error was reported and compilation stopped. But the same batch file ran and
completed when tried a second time. This time with no errors.
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
> > I change a function call and it works fine now. I do not know if this is
> > the real way to solve my problem but this provide a solution.
> >
> > In file pkg.modssl/ssl_engine_int.c:
> > move "ssl_init_Engine(s, p);" function call before
> > "ssl_init
Hi Fred,
I was just starting to wonder what might be behind all this when you hit
the nail on the head.
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Frederic DONNAT wrote:
> I change a function call and it works fine now. I do not know if this is
> the real way to solve my problem but this provide a solution.
>
> In f
Title: RAND function using OpenSSL 0.9.7 (A Solution)
Hi All,
I change a function call and it works fine now. I do not know if this is the real way to solve my problem but this provide a solution.
In file pkg.modssl/ssl_engine_int.c:
move "ssl_init_Engine(s, p);" function call before "ssl_
Cliff,
I compile using --enable-rule=SSL_EXPERIMENTAL like i ve seen it inorder to enable
Openssl "ENGINE" use. (also set SSLCryptoDevice ".." in /conf/httpd.conf)
As i said it works fine for symetric (cipher, digest) and asymetric (RSA, DSA, DH)
stuff! only rand one seems invalid.
In fact in
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Frederic DONNAT wrote:
> I try using OpenSSL0.9.7 with a crypto accelerator and it works fine
> for asymetric and symetric stuff, but it fails when trying to use
> ENGINE random (rand engine is not used, everything is done with
> classic software random).
Don't you have to c
Title: RAND function using OpenSSL 0.9.7
Hi all,
I try using OpenSSL0.9.7 with a crypto accelerator and it works fine for asymetric and symetric stuff, but it fails when trying to use ENGINE random (rand engine is not used, everything is done with classic software random).
Has someone solv
Since I solved this problem for my site last night, I can give you a hint:
My SSL virtual server definition contained the name of the domain in it,
just like my other virtual servers.
Because of some reasons I don't understand right now this seems to confuse
apache.
After I changed the SSL virtu
Hi all,
I am a new member to this group. I have a question which was asked on
2002-06-07 by Ike Ikonne (for which I could not locate any answer in
the list archives) so please forgive me for the repetition...
My situation is like Ike's: I too need to install mod_ssl and Open_SSL
(ie. require sec
>From: liangbin li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>I install apache httpd server with mod_ssl. I broswer a access
>controled
>html file and it calls a programm under cgi-bin directory.
Is this what you want to happen?
>I want to know how I can set up access control with in the cgi-bin's
>progra
It seems that the signing authority in the cert is not recognised by the browser...
Look at the CA list in the browser to check (Tasks -> privacy and security -> security
manager - certificates -> authorities). CA companies have to pay to be included by
default in the browser's list and some do
Could be to do with your version of openssl lib (check it is reasonably up to date) or
with your LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable..
Check out http://www.delouw.ch/linux/Apache-Compile-HOWTO/html/apache.html
for a good user's summary.
Rgds,
Owen Boyle
>-Original Message-
>From: Da
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 10:05:33AM +0930, Glen Vallance wrote:
> This problem doesn't sound like it should be that uncommon, but I can't find
> any information on it.
Once you saw the solution you will find, that the mailing list is full
of problems like these.
> read from 0808D4C0 [080A4000] (7
20 matches
Mail list logo
