Hi Kent,
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Regards,
Lisa
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
> Thank you, Mahesh and Sonal.
>
> I'm still waiting to hear from Lisa and Dana. Neither have been heard
> from since the pen moved a couple years ago. Is anyon
Hi,
The discussion about yang-data is stuck because the NETMOD WG does not
understand or does not agree on what it means to abuse a YANG extension
and use it improperly.
If a tool implementing a standard cannot do so without implementing
certain extensions, then those extensions are not optional,
Hi all,
I've seen some older threads about 'when' handling and they ended up creating a
lot of debate about behavior & intentions (and about how well the text is
written in the specs).
I'm hoping that the community out there is in agreement on yes vs no for the
questions below.
Given the foll
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:28:42AM +, Rohit R Ranade wrote:
> Hi Juergen,
>
> Some thoughts in-lined.
>
> With Regards,
> Rohit R Ranade
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de]
> Sent: 25 April 2018 16:12
> To: Rohit R Ranad
Hi Juergen,
Some thoughts in-lined.
With Regards,
Rohit R Ranade
-Original Message-
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de]
Sent: 25 April 2018 16:12
To: Rohit R Ranade
Cc: netc...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Netconf] [netconf] Comments on
On Wed, 2018-05-02 at 11:36 +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:25:06AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >
> > The primary use case is not "generic RPC messages", but standalone
> > instance documents, error-info structures, etc.
> >
> > > This doesn't seem to be a fu
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:25:06AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
> The primary use case is not "generic RPC messages", but standalone
> instance documents, error-info structures, etc.
>
> > This doesn't seem to be a fundamental change in YANG's scope, or
> > architecture.
The proper solution
Robert Wilton wrote:
>
>
> On 02/05/2018 08:25, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Andy Bierman wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 7:09 AM, Ladislav Lhotka
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Andy Bierman writes:
> >>>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 8:13 AM, Ladislav Lhotka
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri,
On 02/05/2018 08:25, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Andy Bierman wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 7:09 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
Andy Bierman writes:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 8:13 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
On Fri, 2018-04-27 at 16:47 +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-05-02 at 09:16 +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2018-04-27 at 12:19 +0100, Robert Wilton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 27/04/2018 12:03, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 2018-04-27 at 11:23 +0100, Robert Wilton wrot
On Wed, 2018-05-02 at 09:16 +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-04-27 at 12:19 +0100, Robert Wilton wrote:
> > >
> > > On 27/04/2018 12:03, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2018-04-27 at 11:23 +0100, Robert Wilton wrote:
> > > > > On 27/04/2018 11:03, Ma
Kent Watsen wrote:
>
> Juergen writes:
> > Kent writes:
> >> I don't understand talk about abandoning this draft. There is no question
> >> that it is needed (e.g., anima vouch, zerotouch, tail-f's "structure"),
> >> and RFC 8040 is unsatisfactory because 1) it doesn't allow a top-level
> >> 'ch
Kent Watsen wrote:
>
> Lada writes:
> > Andy writes:
> >>IMO, the yang-data defined in RFC 8040 has a clear purpose, and it
> >>is sufficient for that purpose, which is a YANG representation of
> >>an instance document (such as a protocol message or file).
> >
> > The same is basically true even
Andy Bierman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 7:09 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> > Andy Bierman writes:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 8:13 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Fri, 2018-04-27 at 16:47 +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > >> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 04:34:38PM +0
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-04-27 at 12:19 +0100, Robert Wilton wrote:
> >
> > On 27/04/2018 12:03, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2018-04-27 at 11:23 +0100, Robert Wilton wrote:
> > > > On 27/04/2018 11:03, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Ladislav Lhotk
15 matches
Mail list logo