Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
Commit: fe2468b88cbc586232a86aedf8e00facf8919219
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/fe2468b88cbc586232a86aedf8e00facf8919219
Author: Rok Garbas
Date: 2016-07-07 (Thu, 07 Jul 2016)
Changed paths:
M pkg
I have to agree with Jookia on this.
I don't think this issue concerns nix.
To be honest I'm not even sure there's an issue here. I've never heard
of something called "free open-source that costs money". The first part
negates the second.
Ardour was mentioned but I can't find a single reference t
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016, at 06:48 PM, Profpatsch wrote:
> On 16-07-06 09:50am, Kevin Cox wrote:
> > IIUC you can't "really require" money for a GPL program. You can charge
> > for the distribution or for binaries or whatever you like, but nothing
> > is stopping others from building and distributing th
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:10:41AM +0200, Profpatsch wrote:
> No, but we should strife to enable developers however we can.
Could we perhaps find a way to do this without requiring the user to lie about
paying for something just to install something they don't need to pay for?
On 16-07-07 03:12am, Jookia wrote:
> Is this going to be the Nix software store?
No, but we should strife to enable developers however we can.
We are only gathering stuff others gratiously provide us access
to, after all.
I think this goes further.
Once we have e.g. donation info in nixpkgs, we c
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
Commit: 18312f2947943b5eec1c5d09c464afb0e40caf73
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/18312f2947943b5eec1c5d09c464afb0e40caf73
Author: Robert Helgesson
Date: 2016-07-06 (Wed, 06 Jul 2016)
Changed paths:
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
Commit: 7129ebbd5e107be149d4af09f3da90094ec50b14
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/7129ebbd5e107be149d4af09f3da90094ec50b14
Author: William Casarin
Date: 2016-07-06 (Wed, 06 Jul 2016)
Changed paths:
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
Commit: 921d3321f50cf59741f734a87d2dc79499f68759
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/921d3321f50cf59741f734a87d2dc79499f68759
Author: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Date: 2016-07-06 (Wed, 06 Jul 2016)
Changed paths
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
Commit: 87be90336fa26cf99400d97cbd6936ec71171089
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/87be90336fa26cf99400d97cbd6936ec71171089
Author: Miguel Madrid
Date: 2016-07-06 (Wed, 06 Jul 2016)
Changed paths:
M
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 06:46:11PM +0200, Profpatsch wrote:
> On 16-07-07 01:18am, Jookia wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 04:35:51PM +0200, Moritz Ulrich wrote:
> > Is it really Nix's job to enforcing the business models of software, rather
> > than
> > just packaging it? Surely the application
On 16-07-06 09:50am, Kevin Cox wrote:
> On 06/07/16 09:25, Bjørn Forsman wrote:
> > On 6 July 2016 at 14:19, Profpatsch wrote:
> IIUC you can't "really require" money for a GPL program. You can charge
> for the distribution or for binaries or whatever you like, but nothing
> is stopping others fro
On 16-07-07 01:18am, Jookia wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 04:35:51PM +0200, Moritz Ulrich wrote:
> Is it really Nix's job to enforcing the business models of software, rather
> than
> just packaging it? Surely the application could just have a nag screen (if it
> doesn't already.)
How about we
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
Commit: 05b3749bb2a8588746a5b13770145d4aea73e51e
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/05b3749bb2a8588746a5b13770145d4aea73e51e
Author: Thomas Tuegel
Date: 2016-07-06 (Wed, 06 Jul 2016)
Changed paths:
M
On 6 July 2016 at 18:06, Daniel Hlynskyi wrote:
> Hi. I have a container generator:
>
> mkContainer =
> { config, lib
> , additionalConfig ? {}
> }:
> let
> containerParams =
>{ autoStart = true;
>};
> in
> containerParams //
> { config = { config, pkgs, lib, ... }:
> { imports = [
>
Hi. I have a container generator:
mkContainer =
{ config, lib
, additionalConfig ? {}
}:
let
containerParams =
{ autoStart = true;
};
in
containerParams //
{ config = { config, pkgs, lib, ... }:
{ imports = [
];
networking.firewall.enable = false;
} // add
I've collected the list of issues with containers.
Go through this list before starting using them. Declarative containers are
good, but be prepared
=
Bidirectional container access -
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/16754
Container interface is not removed when declarative container
Hi Arnold,
Do you by any chance have LD_LIBRARY_PATH set?
If yes, check if unset'ing it helps.
Renato
On 06/07/16 17:52, Arnold Krille wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am encountering a strange problem here. mosh fails to start because of
> some inconsistency detected by ld.so?
>
> Shell output:
> =
Hi all,
I am encountering a strange problem here. mosh fails to start because of
some inconsistency detected by ld.so?
Shell output:
==
arnold@amazonas:~$ mosh localhost
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h: 517:
elf_machine_rela_relative: Assertion `ELFW(R_TYPE
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 04:35:51PM +0200, Moritz Ulrich wrote:
>
> Philip Carlsen writes:
>
> > Consider instead something like thks in nixpkgs config:
> > ardour = {
> > isPaid = true;
> > }
>
> I like this approach. It's plain and simple. We just need to make sure
> that `nixos-rebuild` and
On 06/07/16 11:17, Roger Qiu wrote:
> I'm interested. Free and proprietary software should be installed in the
> same way in my opinion.
While that is interesting note that so far this conversation is only
talking about free software. (Notably free software that requests
payments for use)
sign
I'm interested. Free and proprietary software should be installed in the
same way in my opinion.
On 07/07/2016 12:27 AM, "Moritz Bartl" wrote:
> On 07/06/2016 03:32 PM, Profpatsch wrote:
> > On 16-07-06 10:16pm, Roger Qiu wrote:
> >> I've been thinking about the mechanics of FOSS app stores. If y
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
Commit: b30852ed41f7e6729de9a75a71a671ce7d03dff9
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/b30852ed41f7e6729de9a75a71a671ce7d03dff9
Author: Bjørn Forsman
Date: 2016-07-06 (Wed, 06 Jul 2016)
Changed paths:
M
Philip Carlsen writes:
> Consider instead something like thks in nixpkgs config:
> ardour = {
> isPaid = true;
> }
I like this approach. It's plain and simple. We just need to make sure
that `nixos-rebuild` and `nix-env` display appropriate messages telling
users how/where to set this. Possib
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
Commit: 851cd1e6af3eeec0b298563f8b584a4eee389a69
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/851cd1e6af3eeec0b298563f8b584a4eee389a69
Author: Kranium Gikos Mendoza
Date: 2016-07-06 (Wed, 06 Jul 2016)
Changed paths
Den 6. jul. 2016 2.19 PM skrev "Profpatsch" :
>
> On 16-07-06 11:58am, zimbatm wrote:
> > We can provide the derivation but ask the user to download the source
> > themselves. I think we already have such a mechanism in place for
non-free
> > software.
>
> But that’s not necessary at all. The sourc
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
Commit: c70db3456f57b82c46347635eda2fa9d0bfced34
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/c70db3456f57b82c46347635eda2fa9d0bfced34
Author: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Date: 2016-07-06 (Wed, 06 Jul 2016)
Changed paths
On 06/07/16 09:25, Bjørn Forsman wrote:
> On 6 July 2016 at 14:19, Profpatsch wrote:
>
> But that still looks like opt-in payment. I'm sure Ardour users
> already know that upstream wants money for it, even without the above
> mechanism. (But I guess if a lot of upstreams do this it'd be more
> di
On 16-07-06 10:16pm, Roger Qiu wrote:
> I've been thinking about the mechanics of FOSS app stores. If you don't want
> to handle the payments, you need to implement a kind of
> payment-authentication, where the principle is the same as dealing with
> private packages. Instead the key being used is
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
Commit: 09e1b26c7981d905f3fc2a1f23f6a0fa43843d10
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/09e1b26c7981d905f3fc2a1f23f6a0fa43843d10
Author: Joachim Fasting
Date: 2016-07-06 (Wed, 06 Jul 2016)
Changed paths:
On 6 July 2016 at 14:19, Profpatsch wrote:
> On 16-07-06 11:58am, zimbatm wrote:
>> We can provide the derivation but ask the user to download the source
>> themselves. I think we already have such a mechanism in place for non-free
>> software.
>
> But that’s not necessary at all. The source is av
On 16-07-06 11:58am, zimbatm wrote:
> We can provide the derivation but ask the user to download the source
> themselves. I think we already have such a mechanism in place for non-free
> software.
But that’s not necessary at all. The source is available openly
and we can also have hydra build the
I've been thinking about the mechanics of FOSS app stores. If you don't
want to handle the payments, you need to implement a kind of
payment-authentication, where the principle is the same as dealing with
private packages. Instead the key being used is a key that is derived
from a successful pa
On 5 July 2016 at 17:57, Eelco Dolstra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07/05/2016 05:18 PM, Bjørn Forsman wrote:
>> Long version:
>> I wanted to see how atomic and safe a NixOS update process really is,
>> so I abused one of my systems by pulling the rootfs disk from it a
>> number of times duing "nixos-rebui
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
Commit: d5c8d7112b3d65e0ff9039c174ce5fa163208175
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/d5c8d7112b3d65e0ff9039c174ce5fa163208175
Author: Ricardo Ardissone
Date: 2016-07-06 (Wed, 06 Jul 2016)
Changed paths:
On 6 July 2016 at 12:50, Bjørn Forsman wrote:
> On 6 July 2016 at 12:27, Profpatsch wrote:
>> Free software doesn’t mean it is free as in free beer.
>>
>> There are a couple of (very good) applications, that are
>> sold, like for example Ardour or Radium.
>> They are normally distributed as binar
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
Commit: 58c00c35bc266b1c315de130e9f091d6993b755b
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/58c00c35bc266b1c315de130e9f091d6993b755b
Author: Kranium Gikos Mendoza
Date: 2016-07-04 (Mon, 04 Jul 2016)
Changed paths
On 6 July 2016 at 12:27, Profpatsch wrote:
> Free software doesn’t mean it is free as in free beer.
>
> There are a couple of (very good) applications, that are
> sold, like for example Ardour or Radium.
> They are normally distributed as binaries, but come with
> the source code (as required by t
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
Commit: 28159315b7f2891e90157129d82a8b6fdca659bc
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/28159315b7f2891e90157129d82a8b6fdca659bc
Author: Ram Kromberg
Date: 2016-07-06 (Wed, 06 Jul 2016)
Changed paths:
A p
Free software doesn’t mean it is free as in free beer.
There are a couple of (very good) applications, that are
sold, like for example Ardour or Radium.
They are normally distributed as binaries, but come with
the source code (as required by their license).
I think nixpkgs should include them as
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
Commit: 3d316da10315c3c02f160869391ba3efd420b596
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/3d316da10315c3c02f160869391ba3efd420b596
Author: Ram Kromberg
Date: 2016-07-06 (Wed, 06 Jul 2016)
Changed paths:
M p
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
Commit: 09f366a360fee8fae4d0e1aa642725738094ea64
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/09f366a360fee8fae4d0e1aa642725738094ea64
Author: Nathan Moore
Date: 2016-07-05 (Tue, 05 Jul 2016)
Changed paths:
M l
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
Commit: bdc17914227c6447baae23a9433faf335898e7cb
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/bdc17914227c6447baae23a9433faf335898e7cb
Author: Frederik Rietdijk
Date: 2016-07-06 (Wed, 06 Jul 2016)
Changed paths:
It does seem like a lot of people are experiencing this problem (on
NixOS and beyond). I'll have to perform some experiments and play around
with it to see how I can replicate it deterministically.
On 5/07/2016 1:15 PM, Ruben Astudillo wrote:
I got the same problem. I think I know the conditi
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
Commit: aeb516c741a1156a66acafa14322b47c63cfd709
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/aeb516c741a1156a66acafa14322b47c63cfd709
Author: Bjørn Forsman
Date: 2016-07-06 (Wed, 06 Jul 2016)
Changed paths:
M
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
Commit: 6876eab511afd1c10b8e89a1ff99aa28c6a44b2d
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/6876eab511afd1c10b8e89a1ff99aa28c6a44b2d
Author: Frederik Rietdijk
Date: 2016-07-06 (Wed, 06 Jul 2016)
Changed paths:
45 matches
Mail list logo