At 19:25 +0100 10/11/04, Vit Zyka wrote:
Hi Otared,
I can give only explanation but in the moment i do not know the
automatic solution.
Hi Vit,
Thank you for your insight. It is right that the same problem appears
in Plain TeX, that is a binary operator within a pair of braces seems
to loose its
At 12:08 -0500 10/11/04, David Munger wrote:
I'm sorry, I'm no TeX/ConTeXt guru and I really have no idea of how to
achieve this. I think now we need Hans' help.
I have indeed noticed that enclosing an operator between braces breaks
the spacing system. Try, for instance:
Yes you are right! This is
1) Somehow the \FromStep[n][reserve] changes the internal mechanism of
glue or spaces in displayed formulas. So one needs (as you do in your
example) to add \; around operators such as +, -, =. Can one avoid this?
Hi Otared,
I can give only explanation but in the moment i do not know the
automat
Hans Hagen wrote :
> David Munger wrote:
>
> > I'm sorry, I'm no TeX/ConTeXt guru and I really have no idea of how to
> > achieve this. I think now we need Hans' help.
>
> I haven't followed the discussion so closely, what is the problem?
We're trying to implement steps-without-JavaScript for sl
David Munger wrote:
I'm sorry, I'm no TeX/ConTeXt guru and I really have no idea of how to
achieve this. I think now we need Hans' help.
I haven't followed the discussion so closely, what is the problem?
Good point! Here's the fix (file updated on my website):
37c37
< \dodoubleempty\doplacefo
Otared Kavian wrote :
> Hi David and all ConTeXters,
>
> I was away from my e-mail so I am late in answering.
> Thank you for the file you put on your site. Indeed everything works
> as intended (the \placeformula no longer advances with each step),
> and I think one may suggest to Hans to inclu
At 16:10 -0500 8/11/04, David Munger wrote:
Argh... It's because of the line splits in email. I just put the file on
my website:
http://cfd.homelinux.org/tex/
Hi David and all ConTeXters,
I was away from my e-mail so I am late in answering.
Thank you for the file you put on your site. Indeed everyt
Hi all,
I finally had some time to look at the recent discussion. Stepwise
presentations have always been somewhat tricky in context, at least for
me.
I think that the rsteps module is a very valuable contribution. No
JavaScript. No dependency on acrobat versions. Just steps.
Thanks to David & co,
Otared Kavian wrote :
> Hi David,
>
> I could not get through the example file: here is what I get:
Argh... It's because of the line splits in email. I just put the file on
my website:
http://cfd.homelinux.org/tex/
Regards,
David
___
ntg-context m
At 13:01 -0500 8/11/04, David Munger wrote:
Excellent idea indeed! Here's the fix. It is obviously not optimal,
though it allows for multiple formula numbers on the same slide. Try it
with:
texexec --pdf --mode=demo t-rsteps
Thanks for your advice.
Hi David,
I could not get through the example file
Otared Kavian wrote :
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for the details. Indeed I get now what is expected from your
> macros, and as a matter of fact the result is much much better than
> that of my crude macros... You did a great improvement!
> So I am going to use yours from now on: thanks again!
>
> I
At 19:57 -0500 7/11/04, David Munger wrote:
Oh sorry for not being clear about it. I was assuming that some
presentation module would be imported, for instance:
\usemodule[pre-original]
So probably there lacks a \page command in your \Subject definition.
About the \[ and \]: you're right. I was usi
Otared Kavian wrote :
> Hi David, Hi all Contexters,
>
> Sorry for being late in answering.
>
> I just tried to test your code but did not succeed in showing things
> step by step, even after adding:
> \def\Subject#1{\centerline{\bf #1}}
> \setuppapersize [S6][S6]
> \setupcolors[state=start]
> a
At 3:07 -0500 6/11/04, David Munger wrote:
Hi all,
Inspiring from Otared Kavian's code and Han's presentation styles with
support for steps, I cooked the following in order to solve the non
JavaScript version issue. I post it in case it could be useful to other
people.
This implementation supports
Hi all,
Inspiring from Otared Kavian's code and Han's presentation styles with
support for steps, I cooked the following in order to solve the non
JavaScript version issue. I post it in case it could be useful to other
people.
This implementation supports an \{Only|From|Until}Step[n] syntax as we
At 11:42 -0500 3/11/04, David Munger wrote:
Hi Otared,
Thanks a lot for you macros. They do the job pretty well. They remind me
of the way Prosper does things. When I have time, I'll try to find out
how to Wiki your post. Thanks again!
David
Hi David,
I am happy that what I sent you was useful.
Ind
Hi Otared,
Thanks a lot for you macros. They do the job pretty well. They remind me
of the way Prosper does things. When I have time, I'll try to find out
how to Wiki your post. Thanks again!
David
Otared Kavian wrote :
> Hi David,
>
> A few months ago I had to use steps in my presentations, bu
David Munger wrote:
try
texexec --pdf --mode=demo s-pre-61
This is actually what I tried.
and see if that one suit syour needs (the stepper can be used with other sytles
as well, once \usemodule[pre-60] is done; acrobat 6 needed)
I think the latest Acrobat Reader version for Linux is 5.0.9. I g
At 18:38 -0500 2/11/04, David Munger wrote:
I think the latest Acrobat Reader version for Linux is 5.0.9. I guess
this means I should forget about steps. Thanks anyway.
David
Hi David,
A few months ago I had to use steps in my presentations, but since I
could not use thouroughly s-pre-60.tex (and
Le 2 nov. 04, à 23:22, David Munger a écrit :
Nothing seems to work here. I'm afraid the problem is indeed that
Acrobat Reader under Linux is not really JavaScript aware...
Would it be possible to implement the steps commands such that steps
span over multiple slides instead of being managed by Jav
> try
>
> texexec --pdf --mode=demo s-pre-61
This is actually what I tried.
> and see if that one suit syour needs (the stepper can be used with other sytles
> as well, once \usemodule[pre-60] is done; acrobat 6 needed)
I think the latest Acrobat Reader version for Linux is 5.0.9. I guess
this
David Munger wrote:
Nothing seems to work here. I'm afraid the problem is indeed that
Acrobat Reader under Linux is not really JavaScript aware...
Would it be possible to implement the steps commands such that steps
span over multiple slides instead of being managed by JavaScript?
try
texexec --pdf
Nothing seems to work here. I'm afraid the problem is indeed that
Acrobat Reader under Linux is not really JavaScript aware...
Would it be possible to implement the steps commands such that steps
span over multiple slides instead of being managed by JavaScript?
David
Le mardi 02 novembre 2004 Ã
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 02.11.2004 um 07:04 schrieb David Munger:
Could someone tell me if I'm doing something bad here, please?
File test.tex
---
\usemodule[pre-original]
\starttext
\Subject{Test}
step 1
\presentationstep
step 2
\stoptext
-
Am 02.11.2004 um 07:04 schrieb David Munger:
Could someone tell me if I'm doing something bad here, please?
File test.tex
---
\usemodule[pre-original]
\starttext
\Subject{Test}
step 1
\presentationstep
step 2
\stoptext
---
texexec --mode=step
Hi,
Could someone tell me if I'm doing something bad here, please?
File test.tex
---
\usemodule[pre-original]
\starttext
\Subject{Test}
step 1
\presentationstep
step 2
\stoptext
---
texexec --mode=step --output=pdf test.tex
This gives me a
Hi,
I have tried every combination of presentationstep and the NextStep
button in pre-fuzzy presentation style, and nothing seems to work. I
have the latest (ConTeXt ver: 2003.9.25 fmt: 2003.9.26 int: english
mes: english) running on Mac OS X (10.2.8) with Gierben Wierda's teTex
distributi
27 matches
Mail list logo
