On 22-3-2010 22:38, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
That sounds good. Do you want the shortcuts to be defined in char-def or
someplace else?
let's make a list and then put the long ones in chardef and the short
ones in a mkiv file
-
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 22-3-2010 16:32, Hans van der Meer wrote:
On 22 mrt 2010, at 16:18, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 22.03.10 16:00, schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
For some reason it is defined as \lbracket in MkIV and undefined in
MkII. Does anyone use \lbracket? If not, we c
On 22-3-2010 16:00, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Hans van der Meer wrote:
This program:
\setupbodyfont[lmodern]
\starttext
\type{$\lbrace$} <$\lbrace$>\crlf
\type{$\lbrack$} <$\lbrack$>\crlf
\stoptext
This does typeset a left brace but chokes on \lbrack.
I took my copy of the TeX
On 22-3-2010 16:32, Hans van der Meer wrote:
On 22 mrt 2010, at 16:18, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 22.03.10 16:00, schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
For some reason it is defined as \lbracket in MkIV and undefined in
MkII. Does anyone use \lbracket? If not, we can change it to \lbrack.
Otherwise, we ca
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Hans van der Meer wrote:
On 22 mrt 2010, at 16:37, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 22.03.10 16:32, schrieb Hans van der Meer:
Any thoughts?
Either both or the long form only, memory is no longer a reason to create
funny names like \infty (can we add \infinity please)
I stro
On 22 mrt 2010, at 16:37, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 22.03.10 16:32, schrieb Hans van der Meer:
Any thoughts?
Either both or the long form only, memory is no longer a reason to
create funny names like \infty (can we add \infinity please)
I strongly disagree with the idea not defining the fo
Am 22.03.10 16:32, schrieb Hans van der Meer:
Any thoughts?
Either both or the long form only, memory is no longer a reason to
create funny names like \infty (can we add \infinity please)
I strongly disagree with the idea not defining the forms \lbrack and
\lbrace.
How do you understand both?
On 22 mrt 2010, at 16:18, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 22.03.10 16:00, schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
For some reason it is defined as \lbracket in MkIV and undefined in
MkII. Does anyone use \lbracket? If not, we can change it to
\lbrack. Otherwise, we can also have both \lbrack and \lbracket
de
Am 22.03.10 16:00, schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
For some reason it is defined as \lbracket in MkIV and undefined in
MkII. Does anyone use \lbracket? If not, we can change it to \lbrack.
Otherwise, we can also have both \lbrack and \lbracket defined.
Any thoughts?
Either both or the long form only,
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Hans van der Meer wrote:
This program:
\setupbodyfont[lmodern]
\starttext
\type{$\lbrace$} <$\lbrace$>\crlf
\type{$\lbrack$} <$\lbrack$>\crlf
\stoptext
This does typeset a left brace but chokes on \lbrack.
I took my copy of the TeX Book and find \brack as one of the defined
This program:
\setupbodyfont[lmodern]
\starttext
\type{$\lbrace$} <$\lbrace$>\crlf
\type{$\lbrack$} <$\lbrack$>\crlf
\stoptext
This does typeset a left brace but chokes on \lbrack.
I took my copy of the TeX Book and find \brack as one of the defined
delimiters in chapter 17. How come?
ConTeXt
11 matches
Mail list logo