On 8/13/2016 4:12 PM, Vya. Y. wrote:
Hello,
After updating to the latest beta, TeXWorks shows an error message every
time I open and compile a document. ("The procedure entry point could
not be located in the dynamic link library").
I don't undestand how pdftex is involved wh
Hello,
After updating to the latest beta, TeXWorks shows an error message every
time I open and compile a document. ("The procedure entry point could not
be located in the dynamic link library").
I don't undestand how pdftex is involved when I compile to luatex.
Rega
ird thing:
>
>> which texexec
> /Users/me/context/tex/texmf-osx-64/bin/texexec
>> which pdftex
> /Users/me/context/tex/texmf-osx-64/bin/pdftex
>> which mtxrun
> /Users/me/context/tex/texmf-osx-64/bin/mtxrun
>> pdftex --version
> pdfTeX 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.1
Hi,
I jut tried to compile a document with texexec, but here's the weird thing:
> which texexec
/Users/me/context/tex/texmf-osx-64/bin/texexec
> which pdftex
/Users/me/context/tex/texmf-osx-64/bin/pdftex
> which mtxrun
/Users/me/context/tex/texmf-osx-64/bin/mtxrun
> pdftex
Richard Chan wrote:
> Thanks - that worked for the \THANH macro - now I have a new error
>
>
> structure : pdftexprimitive @ level 5 : 0.0.7.15.1 -> \Syntax
> {\Tex {\pdfelapsedtime }} \Whatever {read||only integer}
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> l.4258 ...\
ext written in Vietnamese, Greek, Arabic, Chinese,
> Devanagari... in one and the same TeX source file.
The first version of the pdftex manual dates from 1996 or so, at a
time when sending 8-bit files over the net was far from reliable. And
why go back to change a definition that works (well,
On 20 April 2010 Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> Am 20.04.10 05:09, schrieb Richard Chan:
> > I'm new to all this stuff - does MkIV build the pdftex manual?
> >
> > I ran into this problem running ConTeXt minimals on the pdftex 1.4
> > manual sources
> >
Am 20.04.10 05:09, schrieb Richard Chan:
I'm new to all this stuff - does MkIV build the pdftex manual?
I ran into this problem running ConTeXt minimals on the pdftex 1.4
manual sources
context --mode=screen --result=TESTING pdftex-t:
nh
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 09:20, Peter Münster wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01 2009, Vnpenguin wrote:
>
>> > a) (dangerous; I would not do it) install a more recent version of
>> > libc on your machine
>>
>> It's NOT possible.
>
> Hello Vnpenguin,
>
> Why not?
>
In our production environment, only RHEL & Ce
On Sun, Nov 01 2009, Vnpenguin wrote:
> > xetex
> xetex: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found
> (required by xetex)
Hello,
Here, I don't know how to help. I've these packages on my system:
libstdc++33-3.3.3
libstdc++33-devel-3.3.3
libstdc++41-devel-4.1.3_20080612
libstdc
On Sun, Nov 01 2009, Vnpenguin wrote:
> > a) (dangerous; I would not do it) install a more recent version of
> > libc on your machine
>
> It's NOT possible.
Hello Vnpenguin,
Why not?
> > b) we need to set up some virtual machine with an old linux and
> > compile binaries there or find someone
On Sun, Nov 01 2009, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> >
> >> pdftex
> > pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by pdftex)
> >
> > Any help for this problem ?
>
> This is weird. Peter - did you upgrade your linux in the meantime by
On 1 November 2009 Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Vnpenguin, what kernel is running on your OS?
>
> If we set up a virtual machine for compiling binaries - does anyone
> have a suggesting what OS to take, so that it will remain compatible
> with as many x86_64 processors as possible? (Apparently gl
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 21:45, Mojca Miklavec
wrote:
> Vnpenguin, what kernel is running on your OS?
The current kernel is:
> uname -r
2.6.18-164.2.1.el5
> If we set up a virtual machine for compiling binaries - does anyone
> have a suggesting what OS to take, so that it will remain compatible
Vnpenguin, what kernel is running on your OS?
If we set up a virtual machine for compiling binaries - does anyone
have a suggesting what OS to take, so that it will remain compatible
with as many x86_64 processors as possible? (Apparently glibc and
kerner are the deciding factors; but it needs to
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 21:33, Martin Schröder wrote:
> 2009/11/1 Vnpenguin :
>> Correction: CentOS 5.4 was released on 21-Oct-2009. So it's not so
>> "old" at all :-)
>
> Sorry, but it is. It's a free version of RHEL5, which was initially
> released in 2007.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centos
>
2009/11/1 Vnpenguin :
> Correction: CentOS 5.4 was released on 21-Oct-2009. So it's not so
> "old" at all :-)
Sorry, but it is. It's a free version of RHEL5, which was initially
released in 2007.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centos
It you want something modern, use e.g. Fedora.
Best
Martin
__
ies (but it will fail
since you don't have the rights yet).
You may try to run ./update-binaries.sh first and then compile pdftex
to start with (it returns warnings, but feel free to ignore them; the
binary should nevertheless be there). We can create you an account,
but we need to talk first
>
> Hey, CentOS 5.4 just released on 21-May-2009 :-) If I have problem
> with ConTeXt on CentOS 5.4 so all users of RHEL 5.4 are the same: they
> can not!
>
Correction: CentOS 5.4 was released on 21-Oct-2009. So it's not so
"old" at all :-)
_
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 19:59, Mojca Miklavec
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 19:24, Vnpenguin wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:50, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:00, Vnpenguin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 19:24, Vnpenguin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:50, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:00, Vnpenguin wrote:
>>>
>>> pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (requir
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 19:30, Martin Schröder wrote:
> 2009/11/1 Vnpenguin :
>> My box CentOS 5.4 with all updates. What do you mean "upgrade" ?
>
> What glibc-version do you have? rpm -qi glibc?
# yum list installed glibc\*
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
Installed Packages
g
2009/11/1 Mojca Miklavec :
> Or maybe I was too fast. I don't find the exact timeline of libc
> development, so I have no idea how old your linux is. I thought that
> this failure was recent, but apparently it's not (the garden most
> probably has libc-2.8). For 32-bit linux we try to be *very* bac
2009/11/1 Vnpenguin :
> My box CentOS 5.4 with all updates. What do you mean "upgrade" ?
What glibc-version do you have? rpm -qi glibc?
Best
Martin
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add
2009/11/1 Hans Hagen :
> Martin Schröder wrote:
>> No, they are simply build on old systems. Ask Peter. :-)
>
> ah, so they're static binaries
Mostly. glibc is not statically linked.
> ldd Master/bin/x86_64-linux/pdftex
libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x2b177
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:50, Mojca Miklavec
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:00, Vnpenguin wrote:
>>
>> pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by pdftex)
>>
>> glibc.i686 2.5-42
>>
Martin Schröder wrote:
2009/11/1 Hans Hagen :
Martin Schröder wrote:
Indeed. Btw: The binaries from TL run on SUSE 10.1 (which has glibc
2.4).
ah, so maybe you can learn mojca a few tricks then; does this mean that tex
live binaries have some built in magic that checks for libs?
No, they are
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:48, Mojca Miklavec
wrote:
> I forgot to ask: does only pdftex cause problems or also metapost,
> luatex, xetex? It might help to know which of these programs still
> work.
>
> mpost
mpost: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required
2009/11/1 Hans Hagen :
> Martin Schröder wrote:
>> Indeed. Btw: The binaries from TL run on SUSE 10.1 (which has glibc
>> 2.4).
>
> ah, so maybe you can learn mojca a few tricks then; does this mean that tex
> live binaries have some built in magic that checks for libs?
No, they are simply build o
2009/11/1 Mojca Miklavec :
> I'm sweating ... trying to download Sarge DVD on this extra-slow
> connection. And then you remind me that I have a big cartoon box of
> original SuSE 7.2 right below my desk. (Maybe I should start
> considering throwing away a few things like this one, though it seems
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 19:03, Martin Schröder wrote:
> 2009/11/1 Mojca Miklavec:
>> Yes, the easy answer would be "upgrade your linux", but we probably
>> want the binaries to run on slightly older machines as well.
>
> Indeed. Btw: The binaries from TL run on SUSE 10.1 (which has glibc
> 2.4).
I'
Martin Schröder wrote:
2009/11/1 Mojca Miklavec :
Yes, the easy answer would be "upgrade your linux", but we probably
want the binaries to run on slightly older machines as well.
Indeed. Btw: The binaries from TL run on SUSE 10.1 (which has glibc
2.4).
ah, so maybe you can learn mojca a few
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:47, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:00, Vnpenguin wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Just installed minimal on CentOS x86_64. The installation is ok, but
>> when I try pdftex, there is error:
>>
>>> pdftex
>> pdftex: /lib6
2009/11/1 Mojca Miklavec :
> Yes, the easy answer would be "upgrade your linux", but we probably
> want the binaries to run on slightly older machines as well.
Indeed. Btw: The binaries from TL run on SUSE 10.1 (which has glibc
2.4).
Best
Martin
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:00, Vnpenguin wrote:
>
> pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by pdftex)
>
> glibc.i686 2.5-42
>
> Any help for this problem ?
Yes, the easy answer would be "upgrade
I forgot to ask: does only pdftex cause problems or also metapost,
luatex, xetex? It might help to know which of these programs still
work.
Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:00, Vnpenguin wrote:
> Hi,
> Just installed minimal on CentOS x86_64. The installation is ok, but
> when I try pdftex, there is error:
>
>> pdftex
> pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by pdftex)
>
> Any help f
Hi,
Just installed minimal on CentOS x86_64. The installation is ok, but
when I try pdftex, there is error:
> pdftex
pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by pdftex)
> yum list installed glibc*
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Excluding Package
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, John Culleton wrote:
Been away from Context for a while so please bear with me.
I just downloaded context-minimal to my home directory using the
sh ./first-setup.sh
script. I want to use pdftex primarily and now and then regular
Context with texexec. I note that the
Been away from Context for a while so please bear with me.
I just downloaded context-minimal to my home directory using the
sh ./first-setup.sh
script. I want to use pdftex primarily and now and then regular
Context with texexec. I note that the download has references to
luatex however
darwine might help.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Mojca Miklavec
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 02:53, Yue Wang wrote:
>> btw, see also http://www.dependencywalker.com/
>
> Thanks,
>
> The page looks familiar, maybe I have used exactly that program in
> past, but the main problem is the dep
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 02:53, Yue Wang wrote:
> btw, see also http://www.dependencywalker.com/
Thanks,
The page looks familiar, maybe I have used exactly that program in
past, but the main problem is the dependency of that program itself :)
:) :) It needs windows :) :) :)
I got the reply from A
btw, see also http://www.dependencywalker.com/
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Yue Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> One tiny question for those working on Windows (I used to have a
>> program to track library dependencies, but I forgot which one):
>> minimals have plenty of binaries like bibtex.exe that a
Hi,
> One tiny question for those working on Windows (I used to have a
> program to track library dependencies, but I forgot which one):
> minimals have plenty of binaries like bibtex.exe that are taken from
> TeX Live 2008. Any idea which library those binaries depend on?
exescope can do that.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 07:41, Yue Wang wrote:
> Mojca:
>
> This problem is still not fixed. Try to add both kpathsea357.dll
> (required by luatex) and kpathsea357-dev.dll (required by pdftex,
> xetex, mpost) into your fetch script.
Hello,
Thanks a lot for the reminder and sorry
Mojca:
This problem is still not fixed. Try to add both kpathsea357.dll
(required by luatex) and kpathsea357-dev.dll (required by pdftex,
xetex, mpost) into your fetch script.
Yue Wang
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Yue Wang wrote:
> Yes. she needs to add that line into her script.
> f
Yes. she needs to add that line into her script.
for now you can manually get that from w32tex's luatex-dev package.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Fengnan wrote:
> When I updated my context minimal earlier today, at the end of the update
> process, the cmd window pops up a error message box w
When I updated my context minimal earlier today, at the end of the update
process, the cmd window pops up a error message box which says "Unable to find
kpathsea357-dev.dll, so this program cannot be started" ( I translate from
Chinese). Just pure guess, did Mojca forget to put the file in the r
Hi,
> this http://wiki.contextgarden.net/otfinst did it and it actually
> worked quite well, thanks a lot.
good to know :-)
> it even took care of the dashes
> problem. do you know how to default to old style numerals the 'osf'
> doesn't seem to work, and i'm certain that the font supports it.
d write the map file manually
3. try Patrick's otfinst http://wiki.contextgarden.net/otfinst
4. I have a set of support files for using Cronos and Warnock with
pdftex; if you want, I can make a zip and send them to you (not before
Thursday, however).
the free version of lucida (.ttf) tha
y
2. use texfont and write the map file manually
3. try Patrick's otfinst http://wiki.contextgarden.net/otfinst
4. I have a set of support files for using Cronos and Warnock with
pdftex; if you want, I can make a zip and send them to you (not before
Thursday, however).
the free vers
Hi,
>> LuaTeX seems to have been removed from live.contextgarden.net, but it
>> seems that neither the pdftex nor xetex engine is able to compile the
>> most basic
>>
>> \starttext
>> Hello world!
>> \stoptext
>>
>> Just in case it helps an
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> LuaTeX seems to have been removed from live.contextgarden.net, but it
> seems that neither the pdftex nor xetex engine is able to compile the
> most basic
>
> \starttext
> Hello world!
> \stoptext
&g
Hi there,
LuaTeX seems to have been removed from live.contextgarden.net, but it
seems that neither the pdftex nor xetex engine is able to compile the
most basic
\starttext
Hello world!
\stoptext
Just in case it helps and none has noticed it.
Pablo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> text and non text and such
>> If he use \retype the table works.
>>
>
> Thanks; and so does \asciistr
>
> I cannot find documentation on \retype, \asciistr, nor \simplifytype ;
> in which situations should these be used?
as last resort
text and non text and such
>
> If he use \retype the table works.
>
Thanks; and so does \asciistr
I cannot find documentation on \retype, \asciistr, nor \simplifytype ;
in which situations should these be used?
___
; > \input knuth
> >
> > \bTABLE
> > \bTR [align=middle]\bTH Range\eTH{}\bTH Value\eTH{}\eTR
> > \bTR \bTD \type{<} 12\eTD{}\bTD 3\eTD{}\eTR
> > \bTR \bTD 12--16\eTD{}\bTD 2\eTD{}\eTR
> > \bTR \bTD \type{>}16\eTD{}\bTD 1\eTD{}\eTR
> > \eTABLE
> >
pe{<} 12\eTD{}\bTD 3\eTD{}\eTR
> \bTR \bTD 12--16\eTD{}\bTD 2\eTD{}\eTR
> \bTR \bTD \type{>}16\eTD{}\bTD 1\eTD{}\eTR
> \eTABLE
>
> \input knuth
> \stoptext
>
>
> In the case of pdfTeX and XeTeX, the table is given a width equal
> to the textwidth; in the caes o
bTR \bTD \type{>}16\eTD{}\bTD 1\eTD{}\eTR
\eTABLE
\input knuth
\stoptext
In the case of pdfTeX and XeTeX, the table is given a width equal
to the textwidth; in the caes of LuaTeX, it is typeset correctly
with natural widths.
When \setupcolors is removed, both pdfTeX and XeTeX also produce
the c
Hi Martin,
> I hope that I'll be able to build _and_ test the ppc binaries on
> Patrick's computer in the future.
I'll give you an account on my machine on monday... So we(=you :) might
be able to track down this problem.
Patrick
--
ConTeXt wiki and more: http://contextgarden.net
__
2008/4/19, Mojca Miklavec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The problem is that I only build the ppc binaries and never have a
> chance to test them.
I hope that I'll be able to build _and_ test the ppc binaries on
Patrick's computer in the future.
Best
Martin
__
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Hans Hagen wrote:
> > Patrick Gundlach wrote:
> >
> >> (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/sort-lan.mkii))
> [1.1pdftex: Invalid argument
> >
> > weird, looks like an message f
2008/4/19, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> weird, looks like an message from pdftex itself
No, it's glibc. :-(
Best
Martin
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entr
Hans Hagen wrote:
> Patrick Gundlach wrote:
>
>> (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/sort-lan.mkii)) [1.1pdftex:
>> Invalid argument
>
> weird, looks like an message from pdftex itself
Like Martin said already: you get this kind of magic when the large fi
Patrick Gundlach wrote:
> (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/sort-lan.mkii)) [1.1pdftex:
> Invalid argument
weird, looks like an message from pdftex itself
Hans
-
2008/4/19, Patrick Gundlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/sort-lan.mkii)) [1.1pdftex:
> Invalid argument
This is typical for a mixup with LFS. Can you try a newer alpha and
make sure that --disable-largefile is active?
Best
Martin
___
Hello again,
>> I've just downloaded a minimal for mac os x/power-pc and experience
>> the following problem:
I've thought that the "brokenness" of the binary in the minimals is only
related to image inclusion, but it seems as if this touches more ares.
I have no problems in generating new bina
Hi,
>
> I've just downloaded a minimal for mac os x/power-pc and experience
> the following problem:
[...]
additional info:
$ pdftex --version
pdfTeX 3.141592-1.50.0-alpha-20071218-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.6)
kpathsea version 3.5.6dev
$ which pdftex
/opt/context/tex/texmf-osx-ppc/bin/pd
eXExec | no ctx file found
TeXExec | tex processing method: context
TeXExec | TeX run 1
TeXExec | writing option file simple.top
TeXExec | using randomseed 1046
TeXExec | tex engine: pdftex
TeXExec | tex format: cont-en
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.50.0-alpha-20071218 (Web2C 7.5.6)
\write18
On Feb 27, 2008, at 1:05 PM, Martin Schröder wrote:
> How did you get the pdftex binary? Did you fiddle with --disable-
> largefile?
>
> Best
> Martin
I simply ran the build.sh script.
Thomas
2008/2/27, Thomas A. Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The pdf file is OK; this error only occurs with pdftex 1.40.7 on
> powerpc (OS X, 10.5.2). The same file compiles fine with
How did you get the pdftex binary? Did you fiddle with --disable-largefile?
Be
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> On Feb 27, 2008, at 10:52 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>> that looks quite small to me
>>
>> Hans
>
> Question is: where does this value come from? Since it only occurs in
> 1.40.7, it must be some default value set during compilation of
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> On Feb 27, 2008, at 10:52 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>> that looks quite small to me
>>
>> Hans
>
> Question is: where does this value come from? Since it only occurs in
> 1.40.7, it must be some default value set during compilation o
On Feb 27, 2008, at 10:52 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> that looks quite small to me
>
> Hans
Question is: where does this value come from? Since it only occurs in
1.40.7, it must be some default value set during compilation of
pdftex, I assume
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> ! TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [PDF object stream buffer=5].
that looks quite small to me
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH
On Feb 20, 2008, at 10:05 AM, luigi scarso wrote:
>> Just the other day, I encountered a mysterious error which may or may
>> not be related. I upgraded to pdftex 1.40.7 on all my boxes. This was
>> smooth on my intel-macs (OS X 10.5.2). On my powerpc-mac, I got a
>> &
>-
> > texexec --once bibdemo
> TeXExec | processing document 'bibdemo'
> TeXExec | no ctx file found
> TeXExec | tex processing method: context
> TeXExec | writing option file bibdemo.top
> TeXExec | using randomseed 595
> Just the other day, I encountered a mysterious error which may or may
> not be related. I upgraded to pdftex 1.40.7 on all my boxes. This was
> smooth on my intel-macs (OS X 10.5.2). On my powerpc-mac, I got a "TeX
> capacity exceeded!" error with 1.40.7 for a file tha
On Feb 19, 2008, at 9:41 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> here i run
>
> This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.40.5 (Web2C 7.5.6)
>
> and that one does not crash; then i upated to
>
> This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.50.0-alpha-20080214 (Web2C 7.5.6)
>
>
> wh
>
> Following instructions:
>-
> > texexec --once bibdemo
> TeXExec | processing document 'bibdemo'
> TeXExec | no ctx file found
> TeXExec | tex processing method: context
> TeXExec | writing opt
On Feb 19, 2008 10:53 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> George N. White III wrote:
> >
> > Output written on bibdemo.pdf (2 pages, 42919 bytes).
> > Transcript written on bibdemo.log.
> >
> > pdftex: Virtual memory exhausted while trying to reserve 8 bytes for tabl
George N. White III wrote:
>
> Output written on bibdemo.pdf (2 pages, 42919 bytes).
> Transcript written on bibdemo.log.
>
> pdftex: Virtual memory exhausted while trying to reserve 8 bytes for table
> ???.
It seems the error happens at the moment (or just before) pdftex is
e
> \usemodule[bib]
> \usemodule[bibltx]
> \setupbibtex[database=xampl]
> \starttext
> As \cite[article-full] already indicated, bibtex is a \LaTeX-centric
> program.
> \completepublications
> \stoptext
> This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.40.7 (MiKTeX 2.7)
here i run
T
XExec | no ctx file found
TeXExec | tex processing method: context
TeXExec | writing option file bibdemo.top
TeXExec | using randomseed 595
TeXExec | tex engine: pdftex
TeXExec | tex format: cont-en
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.40.7 (MiKTeX 2.7)
entering extended mode
(bibdemo.tex
ConTeXt ve
system.
%
% The following commands sets the default font encoding:
%
% \setupencoding [\s!default=ec]
%
% You can let \CONTEXT\ load the map files for \PDFTEX.
%
% \autoloadmapfilestrue
%
% If you use the more verbose naming scheme, uncomment this:
%
% \usetypescript [map] [default,\defaultencoding]
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't quite understand why, but my distribution became broken at
> some random time point (I do not remember doing anything special in
> the meantime). I have installed ConTeXt from scratch, but the same
> problem persists:
is your cont-sys.tex or rme file go
/sort-def.tex
(/context2/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/sort-def.mkii))
(/context2/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/sort-lan.tex
loading : Context Sorting Macros (languages)
(/context2/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/sort-lan.mkii))
[1.1
pdfTeX warning: pdftex (file pdftex.map): c
Just to propagate informations:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01483.html
--
luigi
it's new .
it's powerful .
it's luatex .
http://www.luatex.org
___
If your question is of interest to others as well
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> Ah, okay! Thanks a lot. So I will pit my ever larger and larger bib
> files against the ever more powerful computers that we will have in
> the future and let them fight it out!
we can manage the bib data in lua and do all bibtex actions there,
Hans
--
On Dec 21, 2007, at 4:56 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Depends on your texmf.cnf. IIRC, I have twenty or so csnames per
> entry, and the baseline for mkii is a bit over 40.000 csnames,
> so you need about
>
>40.000 + 20 * (numberofentries)
>
>> And what do people do in cases like this? One of t
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
>> Just to be complete: In general, the answer to that is "yes", even for
>> mkiv.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Taco
>>
>
> Hmm, okay, thanks, Taco. Any rule of thumb for just how big is too big?
Depends on your texmf.cn
On Dec 21, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Just to be complete: In general, the answer to that is "yes", even for
> mkiv.
>
> Best wishes,
> Taco
>
Hmm, okay, thanks, Taco. Any rule of thumb for just how big is too
big? And what do people do in cases like this? One of the wonderful
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
>
> The same file compiles without errors in mkiv. So I'm curious: Is it
> possible that the bib file is just too large for mkii?
Just to be complete: In general, the answer to that is "yes", even for
mkiv.
Best wishes,
Taco
___
On Dec 21, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> you can increase the hash size in texmf.cnf ... if so, then also
> remake
> the format
>
> in mkiv we need less hash space if only because it got rid of
> encodings
> and regimes
Indeed, increasing the hash_extra size and rebuilding the format
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> Hi all (esp. Taco ;-),
>
> here's a very fundamental question about the bib-module: my main bib
> file now has ~ 1,700 entries. When I tried to compile a file which
> includes bibliographic references in mkii, I got this error:
>
> ! TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [ha
Hi all (esp. Taco ;-),
here's a very fundamental question about the bib-module: my main bib
file now has ~ 1,700 entries. When I tried to compile a file which
includes bibliographic references in mkii, I got this error:
! TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [hash size=6].
\@@shortsectionnumber .
On 7/24/07, Steffen Wolfrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> below you may find links to the talks (in various multimedia formats)
> that our dear gurus just held.
> Very nice that this is made available!
really ,really cool.
--
luigi
---
52 MESZ
> An: "PDF-TeX mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: [pdftex] Fwd: [tug-members] tug2007 online
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Karl Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 24.07.2007 00:54
> Subject: [tug-members] tug2007 online
>
just for sure
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01224.html
--
luigi
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/li
my previous mail. If you want to stick with
>>> texnansi, you should better use pdfTeX.
>>>
>>
>> I have a document with German as the main language, defined ...
>>
>> \usetypescriptfile[type-gyr]
>> \usetypescript[times][texnansi]
>> \mainlanguag
1 - 100 of 270 matches
Mail list logo
