Re: OJB 1.0.4 Error: Oracle thin driver cannot insert CLOB values with length>4000

On 3/7/06, Byrne, Ailish M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This issue was related to the fact that we are using XAPool. Here is > the explanation from the experts. I've cc'd them in case you have any > questions. They patched our OJB 1.0.4 jar as a temporary solution. > > _

RE: OJB 1.0.4 Error: Oracle thin driver cannot insert CLOB values with length>4000

This issue was related to the fact that we are using XAPool. Here is the explanation from the experts. I've cc'd them in case you have any questions. They patched our OJB 1.0.4 jar as a temporary solution. _ The problem here is the unwrapStatemen

Derby configuration

Hi, I'm trying to work with Derby, but I'm not sure which DB to use for the torque.database property. Looking at the torque-gen I see there is a cloudscape, is cloudscape the name to set? Any other special configuration needed? Is there any example to follow? Sean C. McCarthy ---

Re: ODMG ordering with circular pairs

Hi Bruno, Bruno CROS wrote: Our first problem was, that, after commit, P1 was not referencing M in database. I deduced that after a flush(), new locked objects (before flush) can't reference new ones created before flush too (a second time). Humm, strange... we check all code : No apparent mi

Re: EJB3 ?

On 3/6/06, Hale India <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This mail is just to ask about projects of OJB Team about EJB3. > > Now specification seems to me completed and stable and some OJB competitors > has offer. > EJB3 same already to be a standard. > > This seems to me a critical question about

Re: EJB3 ?

OJB runs outside of a container, it is not really comparable. Also ojb criteria api is way better then anything out there. I like to stay far from things like select object(o) from Book o where lower(o.title) like '%java%'. regards, Dennis 2006/3/6, Hale India <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi > > Thi

EJB3 ?

Hi This mail is just to ask about projects of OJB Team about EJB3. Now specification seems to me completed and stable and some OJB competitors has offer. EJB3 same already to be a standard. This seems to me a critical question about OJB future. Any answer welcome Andre

RE: OJB and the X-Files... :)

Great! Thanks Armin and Jakob. Happy user again, Chris :) -Original Message- From: Armin Waibel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 6:08 AM To: OJB Users List Subject: Re: OJB and the X-Files... :) Hi Chris, it was fixed (by Jakob) in OJB_1_0_RELEASE branch and will