Re: removal aware list

I tried to reproduce your test (m:n reference + proxy) without success - I always get a ManageableArrayList instance. I'm using latest from SVN (OJB_1_0_RELEASE branch). Could you exactly describe how to reproduce your problem. regards, Armin While describing i found out that there was another

RE: OJB-DBCP initial connection pool setting support

Sure Armin, http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/dbcp/configuration.html parameter initialSize added since 1.2 version of jar. I am trying to setup a case where x connections are in the pool per number of users, setup the maxActive to expected load, setup some eviction threads and test that after p

Re: OJB-DBCP initial connection pool setting support

Hi Eric, Ferrer, Eric wrote: Hi, DBCP supports an initialSize property for initializing connections on startup, does OJB support this parameter? A DBCP property 'initialSize' is not supported. Could you point me at the DBCP doc-section describe this property? regards, Armin Than

Re: removal aware list

Yes, I have a system with about 600 entities, several are M:N, and all are proxies. I can't reproduce either. I'm using 1.0.3. Regards, Richter Armin Waibel escreveu: Hi Dennis, Dennis Bekkering wrote: Richter, I use 1.04 and explicitly configured ojb not to use a RemovalAwareList. I exp

Re: TxCheck, JTA and Spring

Hi Mike, Mike Perham wrote: We are using Spring and JTA in container to manage transactional DAOs. We have TxCheck enabled and when one of our transactional DAOs is called in JBoss, we get a "No running tx found..." message. Should we disable the TxCheck since we are not using PB transactions o

Re: removal aware list

Hi Dennis, Dennis Bekkering wrote: Richter, I use 1.04 and explicitly configured ojb not to use a RemovalAwareList. I explicitly configured ojb to use a ManageableArrayList. But still i get a RemovalAwareList out of the proxy class's getData method. I tried to reproduce your test (m:n refere

Re: Dynamic SQL without use of PreparedStatement

Hi Martin, Berner Martin wrote: Hy Dos anybody know how to use the benefit of OJB (creating dynamic SQL whit Criteria and Reportquerry), but not to use PreparedStatements which uses Bindvariables? Think this not possible. OJB always use PreparedStatements to perform Criteria based queries.

Re: Problem with simple report query

Hi Aaron, > I want to perform a report query for the ids of VersionBeans that > reference namespaces with a given namespace value. I've tried this: > > ===[BEGIN Query #1]=== >Criteria c = new Criteria(); >c.addGreaterOrEqualThan("id", new Integer(1)); >c.addEqualTo("_nam

Dynamic SQL without use of PreparedStatement

Hy Dos anybody know how to use the benefit of OJB (creating dynamic SQL whit Criteria and Reportquerry), but not to use PreparedStatements which uses Bindvariables? Thanks for any help Martin Berner - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [