O conclusion on this topic would be great. There are a lot of people
waiting for a fix on this topic.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> Hi Ross,
>
> On 03/02/13 23:35, Ross Burton wrote:
> > On Sunday, 3 February 2013 at 21:33, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> >> As they are d
Hi Ross,
On 03/02/13 23:35, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Sunday, 3 February 2013 at 21:33, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>> As they are different architectures you can try this:
>>
>> DISTRO_FEATURES_wm8950 = "here copy your default DISTRO_FEATURES
>> but skip opengl"
>>
>> Replace wm8950 with MACHINE n
Subject: Re: [OE-core] OpenGL as a DISTRO_FEATURE
>
> W dniu 03.02.2013 20:45, Ian Geiser pisze:
>
> > The case I have is 3 platforms: 1) Atom N450 2) WM 8950 3) VIA VX900
> >
> > The Atom has the normal mesa-dri drivers and can use the OpenGL
> > implementation from tha
mbedded.org
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] OpenGL as a DISTRO_FEATURE
>
> On Sunday, 3 February 2013 at 21:33, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> > As they are different architectures you can try this:
> >
> > DISTRO_FEATURES_wm8950 = "here copy your default DISTRO_FEATURES but
On Sunday, 3 February 2013 at 21:33, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> As they are different architectures you can try this:
>
> DISTRO_FEATURES_wm8950 = "here copy your default DISTRO_FEATURES but
> skip opengl"
>
> Replace wm8950 with MACHINE name. Ugly solution but should work.
That means that Qt wo
W dniu 03.02.2013 20:45, Ian Geiser pisze:
> The case I have is 3 platforms: 1) Atom N450 2) WM 8950 3) VIA VX900
>
> The Atom has the normal mesa-dri drivers and can use the OpenGL
> implementation from that. The WM has only OpenGLES drivers and no
> OpenGL implementation. So in that case I wa
> -Original Message-
> From: Ross Burton [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com]
> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 2:04 PM
> To: Ian Geiser
> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] OpenGL as a DISTRO_FEATURE
>
> On Sunday, 3 February 2013 at
On Sunday, 3 February 2013 at 17:15, Ian Geiser wrote:
> Greetings, I maintain 3 different platforms with varying degrees of GL
> support. Would it make more sense to migrate the "opengl" distro feature to
> MACHINE_FEATURES? This way we could compensate for the platforms that use
> Mesa and the
Greetings, I maintain 3 different platforms with varying degrees of GL support.
Would it make more sense to migrate the "opengl" distro feature to
MACHINE_FEATURES? This way we could compensate for the platforms that use Mesa
and the ones that use their custom implementations? Thoughts?
___
