+1!
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Andreas Scheuring <
scheu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> +1
> --
> -
> Andreas
> IRC: andreas_s
>
>
>
> On Fr, 2016-12-16 at 00:14 +0100, Armando M. wrote:
> > Hi neutrinos,
> >
> >
> > Miguel Lavalle has been driving the project forward consistently and
+1
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:04 AM, reedip banerjee
wrote:
> +1 for both Ryan and Nate :)
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Vikram Choudhary
> wrote:
>
>> +1 for Ryan!
>>
>> On Dec 16, 2016 7:23 AM, "Sridar Kandaswamy (skandasw)" <
>> skand...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1. From the neutron-
+1
--
-
Andreas
IRC: andreas_s
On Fr, 2016-12-16 at 00:14 +0100, Armando M. wrote:
> Hi neutrinos,
>
>
> Miguel Lavalle has been driving the project forward consistently and
> reliably. I would like to propose him to be entrusted with +2/+A
> rights in the areas he's been most prolific,
Congrats Abhishek ...
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Abhishek Raut wrote:
> Thank you!
>
> From: "Armando M."
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Date: Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 2:57 PM
> To: "OpenStack Devel
+1 for both Ryan and Nate :)
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Vikram Choudhary
wrote:
> +1 for Ryan!
>
> On Dec 16, 2016 7:23 AM, "Sridar Kandaswamy (skandasw)" <
> skand...@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> +1. From the neutron-fwaas perspective, Nate has been instrumental in
>> driving our integration w
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce the release of Meteos.
Meteos is Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) in Apache Spark.
Meteos allows users to analyze huge amount of data and predict a value by data
mining and machine learning algorithms.
Meteos create a workspace of Machine Learning via sahara
+1 for Ryan!
On Dec 16, 2016 7:23 AM, "Sridar Kandaswamy (skandasw)"
wrote:
> +1. From the neutron-fwaas perspective, Nate has been instrumental in
> driving our integration with neutron on the agent extension framework,
> neutron-lib as well as on CI.
>
> Thanks
>
> Sridar
>
> From: Kevin Bento
Hi folks,
No Horizon meeting next week! I'll be around the week after (28th
December) so if anyone else is around we can totally have a meeting
then.
Things that have happened this week, including in the team meeting[1]
Ocata-2 was tagged!
xstatic-angular-bootstrap 2.2.0.0 was released, which p
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:02:41PM +1100, Joshua Hesketh wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Ian Cordasco
> wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joshua Hesketh
> > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <
> > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> >
A few of us have talked about writing a command to tell when you're
ready to upgrade (restart services with new code) for Ocata because we
have a few things landing in Ocata which are going from optional to
required, namely cells v2 and the placement API service.
We already have the 030 API DB
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 08:28:46PM -0800, Sumit Naiksatam wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Joshua Hesketh
> wrote:
> > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced with
> > a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
> >
> > Please let me know if th
1) Roll Call
2) OPNFV: Daisy CI Progress
3) OpenStack Version management
4) AoB
B.R.,
Zhijiang
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:u
Hi team,
Due to most of the team members will be on vacation in the next couple
of weeks, so we will cancel the next 3 meetings. And the first meeting
of 2017 will be 10th of Jan.
And I also proposed the new meeting time based on our poll, see
https://review.openstack.org/411564 If the patch is m
+1. From the neutron-fwaas perspective, Nate has been instrumental in driving
our integration with neutron on the agent extension framework, neutron-lib as
well as on CI.
Thanks
Sridar
From: Kevin Benton mailto:ke...@benton.pub>>
Reply-To: OpenStack List
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.o
+1
From: Armando M. [mailto:arma...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 3:15 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Miguel Lavalle as neutron core and
Brian Haley as L3 Lt
Hi neutrinos,
Miguel Lavalle has been
+1
From: Kevin Benton [mailto:ke...@benton.pub]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 5:00 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston
as service LTs
+1
On Dec 15, 2016 19:03, "Armando M."
mai
Thank you!
From: "Armando M." mailto:arma...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 2:57 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:open
Hello, Doug,
This is great. One question about the branch patches. In the past, when a new
branch was created, we often have to update the devstack plugin to pull the
code from correct branch. So if self-service branch management is available,
will the devstack plugin will be updated with one p
+1
On Dec 15, 2016 18:18, "Armando M." wrote:
Hi neutrinos,
Miguel Lavalle has been driving the project forward consistently and
reliably. I would like to propose him to be entrusted with +2/+A rights in
the areas he's been most prolific, which are L3 and DHCP.
At the same time, I'd like to pr
+1
On Dec 15, 2016 19:03, "Armando M." wrote:
> Hi neutrinos,
>
> I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for
> service-related patches.
>
> Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and
> neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Sven Anderson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> while I was waiting again for the CI to be fixed and didn't want to
> torture it with additional rechecks, I wanted to find out, how much of
> our CI infrastructure we waste with rechecks. My assumption was that
> every recheck i
Hi Neutrinos,
Infra patch proposed in [1] got me thinking again about what we shall do
when it comes to multinode testing in the gate and how to focus our testing
and CI efforts upstream going forward. My line of thinking has always been
that multinode resources should be devoted to configurations
Hi neutrinos,
I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for
service-related patches.
Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and
neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service framework, the
agent framework and other bits and pieces. At
On 16 December 2016 at 00:01, Clint Byrum wrote:
> So, I've been quietly ranting in hallways about this for a while. I may
> be way way off base here. I want to kick the discussion off, so I've
> submitted a proposal to the arch-wg about it. Please if you're interested
> in how Nova/Neutron/Cinde
Hi neutrinos,
Miguel Lavalle has been driving the project forward consistently and
reliably. I would like to propose him to be entrusted with +2/+A rights in
the areas he's been most prolific, which are L3 and DHCP.
At the same time, I'd like to propose Brian Haley as our next Chief L3
Officer. B
So, I've been quietly ranting in hallways about this for a while. I may
be way way off base here. I want to kick the discussion off, so I've
submitted a proposal to the arch-wg about it. Please if you're interested
in how Nova/Neutron/Cinder interact with nova-compute, I think it might
be worthwhil
On 15 December 2016 at 09:50, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
> +1
>
Welcome to the team Abhishek!
>
> 2016-12-14 10:22 GMT+09:00 Armando M. :
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Abhishek Raut's recent involvement in OSC and python-neutronclient has
>> helped moving a few efforts along in the right direction. I would
Greetings!
We've had a slow couple of months since Barcelona, and I expect we'll
continue to go very slow for the rest of 2016, but we definitely don't
want to lose momentum, so here is what we've been up to and where we're
going in the immediate future:
* arch-wg repo is live - This is the repo
On 12/08/2016 08:05 AM, Jiri Tomasek wrote:
Hi all,
I've been investigating how to implement TripleO network configuration
in TripleO UI. Based on my findings I'd like to propose a solution.
tl;dr proposal: Slightly refactor Network environment files to match GUI
usage, Use Jinja Templating t
Neat, thanks Sven!
Here are the nova stats:
http://paste.openstack.org/show/592551/
--diana
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Sven Anderson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> while I was waiting again for the CI to be fixed and didn't want to
> torture it with additional rechecks, I wanted to find out,
The weekly IRC meetings for Glance are held in #openstack-meeting-4 on
Thursdays at 14:00 UTC. The agenda [0] and transcripts [1] are publicly
available.
Given the upcoming holidays, here's what we decided today about the next
3 weeks:
December 22: We will meet, but don't feel bad if you can't m
Ok, let me reverse this discussion. We think hangouts are exclusive,
and irc is not? I've seen multiple times when people were waaay into
discussion, lines of text swarming the screen, somebody from outside
speaks up, entirely reasonable and on topic thing, but is ignored
because other actors in di
On 14/12/16 18:18, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
I agree that meeting notes are crucial to this type of meeting.I just
say that gerrit PoC/demo is valid form of 'notes' if meeting was about
some implementional detail, which I assume is the case for this type of
meetings.
Do we agree that as hoc hang
-Original Message-
From: Michał Jastrzębski
Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Date: December 14, 2016 at 17:20:21
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input reque
Hi Folks,
We will not have another DVR sub-team meeting until 2017, resuming on January
4th, to accommodate those that will be away.
Enjoy the break!
-Brian
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> We're moving quotas to the API and we're going to stop doing the
> reservation/commit/rollback race dance between API and compute nodes per
> this spec:
>
> https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/ocata/approved/cells-count-resources-to-check-quota-in-api.html
It's very nice sp
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> One of the big things to consider is which of these items directly
> support one of the key PWG issues: "painless upgrades"
>
> The following items: movinging paste.ini out of config, new style
> olso.policy (in code), and rootwrap -> privsep
On 2016-12-14 17:49:46 -0600 (-0600), Monty Taylor wrote:
[...]
> For things we generate in pbr - like AUTHORS and ChangeLog - assuming we
> want to do the same thing in go, we could likely come up with something
> similar. I also think we should consider that perhaps those two files
> are not need
Hi all,
while I was waiting again for the CI to be fixed and didn't want to
torture it with additional rechecks, I wanted to find out, how much of
our CI infrastructure we waste with rechecks. My assumption was that
every recheck is a waste of resources based on a false negative, because
it render
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2016-12-15 11:58:42 -0500:
> One of the big things to consider is which of these items directly
> support one of the key PWG issues: "painless upgrades"
>
> The following items: movinging paste.ini out of config, new style
> olso.policy (in code), and rootwrap
On Dec 15, 2016, at 8:15 AM, Antoine Cabot wrote:
> Each of you are amazing and together you make an awesome team.
> It has been an absolute pleasure to serve as PTL, thank you for letting me
> do so.
It was great to work with you, taking Watcher from an idea to a full OpenStack
project. Thanks
One of the big things to consider is which of these items directly
support one of the key PWG issues: "painless upgrades"
The following items: movinging paste.ini out of config, new style
olso.policy (in code), and rootwrap -> privsep all eliminate files in
/etc that dramatically impact code execu
Greetings OpenStack community,
This week we have the pleasure of adding Ed Leafe as a core. Ed has been a
consistent and positive presence for quite some time and he'll be good, by hook
or crook.
Our discussion today was focused in two areas:
* The developing capabilities guideline (at
http
> On 15 Dec 2016, at 16:19, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Jean-Philippe Evrard's message of 2016-12-15 09:11:12 +:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Maybe this will sound dumb …
>>
>> I received this email on openstack-dev mailing list. I don’t know if it was
>> sent to any other place, because it
Hi folks,
Due to conflicts, we are unable to host the drivers meeting today.
Apologies for the short notice.
Thanks,
Armando
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@
Having heard only affirmative responses, I've added Steve Lewis to the
Glance core group, with all the rights and privileges pertaining thereto.
Welcome to the Glance core team, Steve!
On 12/13/16 5:05 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
> I'd like to propose Steve Lewis (stevelle on IRC) for Glance core.
Hello everyone,
Due to the upcoming holidays we have a modified meeting schedule the next few
weeks.
December 29th meeting is cancelled.
December 22nd meeting is tentative. Kevin_Zheng, lei-zh, yingjun will
coordinate deciding whether or not one is needed and if one of them will be
available
Excerpts from Jean-Philippe Evrard's message of 2016-12-15 09:11:12 +:
> Hello,
>
> Maybe this will sound dumb …
>
> I received this email on openstack-dev mailing list. I don’t know if it was
> sent to any other place, because it’s basically agreeing on development to be
> done, which make
On 14/12/16 12:34, Marios Andreou wrote:
> On 14/12/16 11:17, Julie Pichon wrote:
>> On 14 December 2016 at 08:56, Dougal Matthews wrote:
>>> On 13 December 2016 at 16:12, Emilien Macchi wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Marios Andreou
wrote:
> Hi OOOs o/ as discussed o
Hello everyone,
I’d lke to announce that next 3 meetings (Dec. 22, Dec. 29, Jan. 5) for Sahara
project are cancelled due to future holidays (Christmas, New Year). Next
meeting will be at Jan. 12.
If you have something to discuss, bring your topics to #openstack-sahara
channel or mailing list.
Hi Watcher team,
I would like to share with you that I do not intend to run for the PTL
position of the Pike development cycle starting in March 2017. Next PTL
elections will be held at the end of January 2017. I'm sending this now
so I can work with people interested in the role, if you intend to
Hi All,
As a lot of people are now going on vacation for the holiday season, we
decided to pick up IRC meetings in 2017.
So, our first meeting will be 4th Jan 2017 @ 17:00 UTC
See everyone after the break
Graham
__
OpenSta
On 12/15/2016 3:11 AM, Andrey Volkov wrote:
Hi,
I totally agree with Matt than `os-quota-class-sets` is inconsistent.
It has that hardcoded default class can't be changed.
API call is documented neither Nova nor Cinder (has the same API for
quotas).
With defaults in the configuration I have som
Hi,
Due to the holiday season the next notification subteam meeting will be held on
3rd of January [1].
Cheers,
gibi
[1] https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20170103T17
__
OpenStack Development M
Waldemar wrote:
Hi Ihar et al,
Apologies for late reply. We were fighting couple of issues with the CI
in last couple of days. The networking problem mentioned by Ihar was one
of them.
We're running fine as of yesterday [1]. To stay on the safe side let's
wait a few days so CI proves stab
This actually seems really useful, thanks Christian.
On 15/12/16 11:35, Christian Berendt wrote:
Hello everybody.
Based on the dashboard which is used for the Nova project I have created one
for Kolla. The dashboard gets updated hourly.
http://kolla.betacloud.io/bugs-dashboard.html
Christian
Hello everybody.
Based on the dashboard which is used for the Nova project I have created one
for Kolla. The dashboard gets updated hourly.
http://kolla.betacloud.io/bugs-dashboard.html
Christian.
--
Christian Berendt
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de
Web: ht
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Ana Krivokapic
> wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > On the 12th of January 2017, I'll lead a TripleO deep dive[1] session on
> how
> > to contribute to the TripleO UI. Hope to see many of you there!
>
> That's
Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote:
> Maybe this will sound dumb …
>
> I received this email on openstack-dev mailing list. I don’t know if it was
> sent to any other place, because it’s basically agreeing on development to be
> done, which makes sense to me.
> So openstack-dev people (called further “d
Hello, Kevin and others may be involved:
After the discussion for "VxLAN L2 networking across Neutron"[1], Tricircle
team wants to contribute on this point as mentioned in the recap mail[2]:
"formalize the tunnel termination point by adding it to the port binding data
model just like other enca
Hi,
I totally agree with Matt than `os-quota-class-sets` is inconsistent.
It has that hardcoded default class can't be changed.
API call is documented neither Nova nor Cinder (has the same API for
quotas).
With defaults in the configuration I have some concerns:
- As it was mentioned before, poss
Hello,
Maybe this will sound dumb …
I received this email on openstack-dev mailing list. I don’t know if it was
sent to any other place, because it’s basically agreeing on development to be
done, which makes sense to me.
So openstack-dev people (called further “devs”) will push their company ag
+1
2016-12-14 10:22 GMT+09:00 Armando M. :
> Hi folks,
>
> Abhishek Raut's recent involvement in OSC and python-neutronclient has
> helped moving a few efforts along in the right direction. I would like to
> suggest we double down on core firepower for the neutronclient repo
> alongside Akihiro [
63 matches
Mail list logo